지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문
- 저자정보
- 지도교수
- 정유진
- 발행연도
- 2018
- 저작권
- 전북대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
이용수8
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to investigate the acceptance of family diversity among college students and related variables. Data were collected by structured questionnaire with 280 students who attended in three universities.
SPSS Statistics Program version 24.0 was used to analyze the collected data. To answer the research questions, descriptive statistics, t-test, F-test, Pearson＇s correlation analyses, and regression analyses were performed.
The major results of the survey were summarized as below.
First, the acceptance of diversity family among college students was slightly higher than the middle level(M=12.11). Most students accepted nuclear family as a typical family. More than half of the students accepted single parent families, adaptive families, step families, miss mom families, childless families, homosexual families, and families composed of siblings as a family.
Second, there was a significant difference in religiosity. Students without religion were higher than their counterparts with religion in level of family diversity acceptance.
Third, among the personal factors, traditional family value had a significant negative effect on the acceptance of family diversity. And perspective taking had a positive effect on acceptance of family diversity.
Fourth, among the family factors, parent-child open communication did not affect the acceptance of family diversity. But parents’ gender egalitarian beliefs had a significant positive effect on the acceptance of family diversity.
Lastly, regarding the relative effects of the personal and family factors, the traditional family value had the largest effect on the acceptance of family diversity among college students.
SPSS Statistics Program version 24.0 was used to analyze the collected data. To answer the research questions, descriptive statistics, t-test, F-test, Pearson＇s correlation analyses, and regression analyses were performed.
The major results of the survey were summarized as below.
First, the acceptance of diversity family among college students was slightly higher than the middle level(M=12.11). Most students accepted nuclear family as a typical family. More than half of the students accepted single parent families, adaptive families, step families, miss mom families, childless families, homosexual families, and families composed of siblings as a family.
Second, there was a significant difference in religiosity. Students without religion were higher than their counterparts with religion in level of family diversity acceptance.
Third, among the personal factors, traditional family value had a significant negative effect on the acceptance of family diversity. And perspective taking had a positive effect on acceptance of family diversity.
Fourth, among the family factors, parent-child open communication did not affect the acceptance of family diversity. But parents’ gender egalitarian beliefs had a significant positive effect on the acceptance of family diversity.
Lastly, regarding the relative effects of the personal and family factors, the traditional family value had the largest effect on the acceptance of family diversity among college students.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 11. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 12. 연구문제 4Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 51. 가족의 개념 52. 가족의 변화 요인 83. 가족의 다양화 104. 가족 다양성 수용도에 관한 선행연구 155. 가족 다양성 수용도에 영향을 미치는 요인 181) 개인적 요인 18(1) 전통적 가족주의 가치관 18(2) 조망수용능력 192) 가족적 요인 21(1) 부모-자녀 개방형 의사소통 21(2) 부모의 양성평등의식 23Ⅲ. 연구 방법 251. 연구대상 및 자료수집 252. 연구대상자의 일반적 특성 263. 연구도구 281) 가족 다양성 수용도 282) 개인적 요인 29(1) 전통적 가족주의 가치관 29(2) 조망수용능력 293) 가족적 요인 30(1) 부모-자녀 개방형 의사소통 30(2) 부모의 양성평등의식 314. 분석방법 32Ⅳ. 연구결과 및 분석 331. 가족 다양성 수용도 332. 일반적 특성에 따른 가족 다양성 수용도의 차이 353. 개인적 요인과 가족적 요인이 가족 다양성 수용도에 미치는 영향 361) 개인적 요인 362) 가족적 요인 373) 개인적 요인과 가족적 요인의 상대적 영향력 38Ⅴ. 결론 및 논의 401. 요약 및 논의 402. 의의 463. 제언 46참고문헌 49부 록 57설 문 지 59
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0