메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

문인경 (서울대학교, 서울대학교 대학원)

발행연도
2018
저작권
서울대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수1

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
My Ph.D. studies focus on the petrological, mineralogical and geochemical studies of iron ore and magnetite from banded iron formations (BIFs) and their related wall rock (amphibolite). I performed integrated studies on ore deposit geology, mineralogy, petrology and geochemistry on the Yishui BIF. Yishui BIF is located in North China Craton (NCC) and considered as the representative area for revealing an association between the genesis of BIF and tectonic setting. The genesis of Yishui BIF had never been studied before. The data constrained the genesis of these BIFs and provided information about the tectonic evolution of the Archean NCC. Additionally, the data provided an improved understanding of the petrogenesis of the BIF?related wall rocks. It can also be used to interpret the relationship between the BIFs and wall rock and the tectonic evolution of the NCC. Rare earth elements (REEs) and trace elements were used as geochemical proxies. The results of these studies suggest that the Yishui BIFs were precipitated from a mixture of less than 1% high?temperature hydrothermal fluids (> 250 °C) and seawater. The abundant ore?forming materials, such as iron and silica, formed under anoxic and suboxic submarine conditions. In addition, the protolith of the related wall rock (Yishui amphibolite) was alkali basalts reminiscent of ocean island basalt (OIB) and formed in an intraplate setting with no crustal assimilation during magma ascent. On the basis of these results, mantle plume model was preferred, which can explain the geochemical signatures of both the Yishui amphibolites and the Yishui BIFs. This model is also very consistent with the tectonic evolution of the NCC.
And, I determined trace element contents of magnetite from Superior?type BIFs and Algoma?type BIFs by in?situ LA?ICP?MS analyses. Combining the data obtained in my study with those from existing literatures, new systematic differences in magnetite composition between Archean Algoma?type and Paleoproterozoic Superior?type BIFs to understand the influence of their genetic conditions on magnetite chemistry were proposed. Magnetite is a representative ore mineral in BIFs and its composition can be a powerful indicator of petrogenesis and provenance. Previous studies classified BIFs into Algoma? and Superior?types based on their tectonic setting, size and lithologic associations. Our results, together with a compilation of previously reported trace element data on magnetite from other regions, indicate that there are systematic differences in trace element compositions of magnetite between Algoma? and Superior?type BIFs due to differences in their depositional environments. The magnetite from Algoma?type BIFs is more enriched in Al, Ti, Ni, and V than the magnetite from Superior?type BIFs. The former precipitated dominantly from high?temperature hydrothermal fluid under low oxygen fugacity conditions, whereas the latter formed mainly from low?temperature and relatively oxidized seawater. The results of the study demonstrate that the trace elemental composition trends of magnetite from Algoma? and Superior?type BIFs are well consistent with previously suggested geochemical characteristics of these BIFs, further indicating the close relationship of BIFs with their genetic environments.
In addition, magnetite from the superior?type Yuanjiacun BIF in NCC was studied using Raman spectroscopy. The main purpose of the study was to clarify the relationship between the timing for the formation of Yuanjiacun BIF and the coeval oxygen fugacity (fO2) through Raman analysis of magnetite. Combined with previous geochemical data, the results of this study suggest that the Yuanjiacun BIF has close relationship with Great Oxidation Event (GOE).

목차

Table of Contents
Abstract ⅰ
Table of Contents ⅳ
List of Figures ⅵⅱ
List of Tables ⅹⅴ
Chapter 1. Introduction 1
References 5
Chapter 2. Geochemical constraints on the genesis of the Algoma?type banded iron formation (BIF) in Yishui County, Western Shandong Province, North China Craton 9
Abstract 9
2.1. Introduction 10
2.2. Geological setting of the region and deposit 13
2.2.1. Regional Geology 13
2.2.2. Geology of the Yishui BIF 16
2.3. Petrology and mineralogy of the Yishui BIF 17
2.4. Analytical Methods 19
2.5. Results 20
2.5.1. Iron ore whole rock geochemistry 20
2.5.1.1. Major element analyses 20
2.5.1.2. Rare earth element and trace element analyses 21
2.5.2. Iron ore compositions 22
2.6. Discussion 23
2.6.1. Constraints on the source of the ore?forming material of the Yishui BIF 23
2.6.1.1. Detrital input 23
2.6.1.2. Source characteristics 24
2.6.2. Genesis of the Yishui BIF and tectonic implications 28
2.6.2.1. Depositional environment 28
2.6.2.2. Tectonic implications of the Archean NCC and a possible genetic model 29
2.7. Conclusions 31
References 33
Chapter 3. Archean tectonic evolution and the genetic link between wall rocks and BIFs in North China Craton 61
Abstract 61
3.1. Introduction 62
3.2. Regional and local geology 64
3.3. Sample description and analytical methods 66
3.3.1. Sample description 66
3.3.2. Analytical methods 67
3.4. Results 67
3.4.1. Major elements 67
3.4.2. Trace and rare earth elements 68
3.5. Discussion 69
3.5.1. Protolith reconstruction 69
3.5.1.1. Evaluation of element mobility 69
3.5.1.2. Petrological classification 70
3.5.1.3. Crustal contamination 70
3.5.2. Petrogenetic interpretation 71
3.5.2.1. Sources of mantle in the NCC 71
3.5.2.2. Tectonic significance 73
3.5.3. Genetic relationship between amphibolite and Yishui BIF 74
3.5.4. Implications for the evolution of the Eastern Block of the
NCC 75
3.6. Conclusions 77
References 78
Chapter 4. Interpretation of formation condition in Superior?type banded iron formation (BIF) of Yuanjiacun in North China Craton using magnetite 96
Abstract 96
4.1. Introduction 97
4.2. Geological Setting 98
4.3. Method 99
4.4. Result 101
4.5. Discussion 102
4.5.1. The relationship between Yuanjiacun BIF and GOE 102
4.6. Conclusion 104
References 105
Chapter 5. In?situ LA?ICP?MS trace elements analyses of magnetite: Implications for BIFs genesis and new insight on the geochemical difference between Algoma? and Superior?type BIFs 116
Abstract 116
5.1. Introduction 117
5.2. Geological background 118
5.2.1. The Yishui BIF 119
5.2.2. The Huoqiu BIF 120
5.2.3. The Yuanjiacun BIF 121
5.3. Analytical method 122
5.3.1. Whole?rock major and trace element analysis 122
5.3.2. Magnetite major and trace element analysis 122
5.4. Results 123
5.4.1. Algoma?type Yishui BIF 123
5.4.1.1. Petrography 123
5.4.1.2. Iron ore whole?rock composition 124
5.4.1.3. Magnetite composition 124
5.4.2. Superior?type Huoqiu BIF and Yuanjiacun BIF 125
5.4.2.1. Petrography 125
5.4.2.2. Geochemistry of iron ore 125
5.4.2.3. Geochemistry of magnetite 126
5.5. Discussion 126
5.5.1. Algoma? and Superior?type BIFs 126
5.5.2. Geochemical differences in magnetite from the Algoma? and Superior type BIFs 130
5.5.2.1. The global trend on the magnetite compositions 130
5.5.2.2. Regional trend on the magnetite compositions 134
5.6. Concluding remarks 137
References 139
Chapter 6. Summary and conclusions 161
요약 (국문초록) 162

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0