메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

정현근 (고려대학교, 고려대학교 대학원)

지도교수
김민기
발행연도
2019
저작권
고려대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수2

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Normal body tissue or lesion characteristics in T1 images have been evaluated; however, how external parameters effect the change in signal intensity by gadolinium-based contrast agent remains unknown. We investigated how contrast enhancement changed according to echo time(TE) in 3.0T magnetic resonance (MR) T1 imaging and determined the optimal settings for TE in contrast-enhanced T1 imaging. Since there are no guidelines regarding parameters for T1 enhancement when using MR-contrast agents, we analyzed results from varying TEs (between 25 and 7 msec) in both a phantom and clinical study. We obtained the following results: contrast percentage of fat to saline increased from 740.0?1003.6%, response start point increased from 30?90 mmol, max peak signal intensity increased from 1771?2425 a.u., max peak point increased from 2?4 mmol, enhancement percentage of the max peak signal intensity (MPSI) to saline increased from 1671.0?2065.2%, the average of SI on each mol as TE increased from 600.8?996.6 a.u., the average of SI as TE on each molar concentration increased from 378?845 a.u., the AEPSS increased from 44.3?140.3%, and the AEPSC increased from 224.3?647.8%. We confirmed that TE can affect contrast enhancement, and the lowest TE has faster and higher effects on contrast enhancement.

목차

* Contents
* Abstract
1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1
2. Materials and Methods ........................................................................................ 6
2.1 Phantom study ................................................................................................ 6
2.1.1 Preparation of GBCA and the MR phantom ................................................... 6
2.1.2 MRI specification and protocol ...................................................................... 9
1) MRI specification ............................................................................................... 9
2) Sequence and parameters ................................................................................. 9
2.1.3 Experimental procedure ................................................................................ 10
2.2 Clinical study ................................................................................................... 12
2.3 Method of analysis .......................................................................................... 14
2.4 Statistical analysis ............................................................................................ 17
3. Results ................................................................................................................ 18
3.1 Phantom study ................................................................................................. 18
3.2 Change in GBCA SI ........................................................................................... 19
3.3 Clinical study ................................................................................................... 25
4. Discussion ........................................................................................................... 29
5. Conclusions .......................................................................................................... 36
6. References ........................................................................................................... 37

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0