The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of working hours and recreation hours, which account for the largest part of the work of urban railroad engineer, on the prvention of human errors through input to the job. For this, the following research questions were set up. First, how fo working hours and recreation hours affect the income to work in performing a job? Second, in performing a job, dos the import of work have an affect as a mediating role between working hours and recreation hours and human error prevention? In order to achieve the research goal, the entire urban railroad operating institution was selected, and a survey was conductedby selecting 300 people as a sample of the memebers of the organization who are working as urban railroad engineers, and 275 copies were collected from a total of 7 institutions(91.6% answer rate). Of the collected questionnaires, 236 copies(78.6%) were used for analysis, excluding 39 copies(13%) of unfaithfulness. In the first step for this study, frequency and percentage were calculated using SPSS and AMOS 26.0 programs. In the second step, descriptive statistics (average, standard deviation) were calculated to identify variables in order to grasp the working hours, recreation hours, job commitment and human error prevention level of the engineer. In the third step, t-test and ANOVA chacks were conducted to verify the difference in the level of prevention of human error and working hours, recreation hours, job income, and human error according to demographic characteristics. In the fourth step, exploratory false-person analysis (EFA) was performed to verify the validity of the measurement variables, and Cronbach’s a coefficient was calculated to verify the reliability. In the final and fifth step, path analysis, an extended form of multiple regression analysis, was conducted to verify the hypothesis to establish the influence relationship between the research variables, and the significance of the mediating effect was verified through the bootstrap method. The significance level of the above statistical analysis and hypothesis test was conducted at a =.05(Kline, 2010). The results of this study are as follows. First, the verification result that predicted that the working hours of the engineer will have a direct positive(+) effect on the prevention of human errors, the research hypothesis 1 was rejected because the working hours of the engineer did not have a significant effect on the prevention of human errors. Therefore, it was found that the working hours of an engineer do not directly affect the prevention of human errors, but rather have an affect on the prevention of human errors through the mediation of job commitment. Second, it was found that the recreation time of the engineer has a significant positive(+) effect on the prevention of human error directly, and the more recreational time of the institution feels appropriate, the higher the level of human error prevention is. Third, it was found that the working hours and recreation hours of an engineer have a significant positive effect on job commitment, and the more they feel that working hours are appropriate, the higher their job satisfaction is. Fourth, it was found that the engineer’s job commitment had a significant positive effect on the prevention of human error, and the degree of the engineer’s commitment to the job had a positive effect on the level of human error prevention. Finally, the research showing that as a result of verifying the mediating effect of job commitment in the relationship between the engineer’s working hours and recreation hours and the prevention of human errors, the indirect effect of the engineer’s working hours and recreation hours- job commitment- human error prevention was found to be significant. Therefore, it means that the working hours and recreation hours of the engineer have a lot of influence on the job commitment to prevent human error. Based on the result of this study, the implications of research in the practical and academic fields, and suggestions for the study of common place were discussed.
제1장 서 론 1제1절 연구 배경 1제2절 연구 목적 2제2장 이론적 배경 3제1절 철도기관사 근무 현황과 선행연구 3제2절 직무몰입 15제3절 인적오류 22제3장 연구 설계 41제1절 연구모형과 가설설정 41제2절 변수의 조작적 정의 43제3절 조사설계 및 분석방법 46제4장 연구 결과 48제1절 인구통계학적 특성 48제2절 측정도구의 타당성과 신뢰도 검증 49제3절 기관사의 인구사회학적 특성에 따른 연구변인의 차이 53제4절 연구변인의 상관관계 59제5절 연구가설의 검증 60제5장 결 론 64제1절 결론 및 시사점 64제2절 한계점과 후속 연구제안 66참고문헌 67Abstract 70부 록(설문지) 72