지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수15
제목 차례제1장 서론 1제1절 연구 배경 및 필요성 11.1.1 연구 배경 및 필요성 11.1.2 한국의 산림자원조사 31.1.3 연구의 목적 6제2절 연구 방법 71.2.1 국가산림자원조사 자료의 구축 및 고정표본점의 구성 71.2.2 기후 자료 101.2.3 자료 처리 및 통계분석 10제2장 차수별 조사구의 변화 11제1절 연구 배경 및 필요성 11제2절 연구 방법 122.2.1 5~7차 국가산림자원조사 고정표본점의 구성 122.2.2 Index 계산 132.2.3 표본점 군집 구성의 변화 152.2.4 임목 축적 계산 16제3절 연구 결과 212.3.1 차수에 따른 개체 수와 종 수의 변화 212.3.2 고정표본점 특성의 변화 양상 242.3.3 표본점 군집 구성의 변화 양상 26제4절 고찰 282.4.1 차수별 종 수, 개체 수, 밀도 및 축적의 변화 282.4.2 표본점 내 종 다양성 변화 28제5절 결론 292.5.1 생장 및 종 다양성의 변화 292.5.2 연구대상 수종 선정 30제3장 수종별 생장 특성 33제1절 연구 배경 및 필요성 33제2절 연구 방법 353.2.1 5차 국가산림자원조사 고정표본점의 구성 353.2.2 5차 국가산림자원조사 목편 자료 구축 363.2.3 목편 자료의 선별 363.2.4 연령에 따른 수종별 생장 분석 393.2.5 Modified Mann-Kendall 분석 413.2.6 구배에 따른 차이 통계분석 41제3절 연구 결과 413.3.1 연간 강수량 및 기온 변화 413.3.2 수종별 공간 분포에 대한 기온, 강수량, 밀도의 영향 443.3.3 수종별 생장 특성 533.3.4 강수, 온도 그리고 밀도 구배에 따른 수종별 BAI 553.3.5 생장 경향 분석 63제4절 고찰 653.4.1 공간 분포에 따른 접근 653.4.2 시간 흐름에 따른 접근 71제5절 결론 72제4장 수종별 고사율 특성 74제1절 연구 배경 및 필요성 74제2절 연구 방법 754.2.1 5~7차 국가산림자원조사 고정표본점의 구성 764.2.2 국가산림자원조사 고정표본점의 선별 764.2.3 고사목의 추정 764.2.4 고사율의 계산 824.2.5 표본점 단위 특성 인자의 계산 83제3절 연구 결과 864.3.1 고사목 분포 특성 864.3.2 지형 인자에 따른 수종별 입목과 고사목의 분포 924.3.3 기후 인자에 따른 수종별 입목과 고사목의 분포 974.3.4 경쟁에 따른 수종별 입목과 고사목의 분포 102제4절 고찰 1064.4.1 지형 특성에 따른 수종별 고사율 1064.4.2 경쟁 특성에 따른 수종별 고사율 1064.4.3 기후 특성에 따른 수종별 고사율 109제5절 결론 112제5장 종합결론 113참 고 문 헌 116Abstract 155표 차례Table 1 History of the Korean forest inventory survey. 5Table 2 The number of permanent sample plots surveyed in NFI 5th-7th. 13Table 3 Species-specific wood density and allometric equation parameters for stem biomass. 18Table 4 Alternative species list for undeveloped allometric equation species. 20Table 5 Changes in populations of the top 19 most common species by survey order, and the rate of change compared to the previous survey order. 22Table 6 The number of species-specific tree-rings sample used in the growth analysis. 38Table 7 The example of results of matching trees considered to be the same in permanent sample plot 1041361 from 5th and 6th national forest inventory (NFI) data. 80Table 8 Misidentification of some species in the genus Prunus 81Table 9 The number of alive and dead trees each period by diameter range, the number of changed trees, and the rate of change. 91Appendix table 1 The number of trees recorded in each NFI survey order and the number of changed trees of each period. 134그림 차례Figure 1 Structure of survey plot of Korean national forest inventory (NFI) since 5th NFI. The elevation map of Republic of Korea (A), location of survey plots in Seoul (B), diagram of survey composition in a cluster plot for NFI (C). 9Figure 2 Changes in the total number of trees (A) and species (B) recorded in each survey consecutive survey order (NFI 5th, NFI 6th, NFI 7th). 21Figure 3 Changes in stand density (A), forest stock (B), average species diversity, dominance, evenness, richness index (C) in consecutive survey order (NFI 5th, NFI 6th, NFI 7th). 25Figure 4 The degree of change in the life history traits of each plot was expressed as annual mean growth rates of change. 27Figure 5 List of the dominant species in Korea and relative abundance of that species. 32Figure 6 Diagram of Regional Curve Standardization (RCS) method to remove signals derived from tree age and tree size. 40Figure 7 Changes in annual mean temperature (A), CV of temperature (B), and annual precipitation (C) from 1981 to 2009 in plots collected tree rings. Geographical distribution of tree-ring series with annual mean climate variables during the same time period (D, E, F). 43Figure 8 Specific-species distribution of tree-ring series by aspect which is a topographical characteristic factor. 46Figure 9 Specific-species distribution of tree-ring series by slope which is a topographical characteristic factor. 47Figure 10 Specific-species distribution of tree-ring series by altitude which is a topographical characteristic factor. 48Figure 11 Species-specific geographical distribution of tree-ring samples along annual mean temperature 50Figure 12 Species-specific geographical distribution of tree-ring samples along co-variance of temperature. 51Figure 13 Species-specific geographical distribution of tree-ring samples along annual mean precipitation. 52Figure 14 Species-specific basal area increment (BAI) with tree age represented by smooth spline 54Figure 15 Mean annual growth of Pinus densiflora by age according to the gradients of the mean annual precipitation (P.avg, ), mean annual temperature (T.avg, ) and plot density (plot.den, trees ha-1) for 30 years from 1981 to 2009. 57Figure 16 Mean annual growth of Quercus mongolica by age according to the gradients of the mean annual precipitation (P.avg, ), mean annual temperature (T.avg, ) and plot density (plot.den, trees ha-1) for 30 years from 1981 to 2009 58Figure 17 Mean annual growth of Quercus variabilis by age according to the gradients of the mean annual precipitation (P.avg, ), mean annual temperature (T.avg, ) and plot density (plot.den, trees ha-1) for 30 years from 1981 to 2009. 59Figure 18 Mean annual growth of Quercus serrata by age according to the gradients of the mean annual precipitation (P.avg, ), mean annual temperature (T.avg, ) and plot density (plot.den, trees ha-1) for 30 years from 1981 to 2009 60Figure 19 Mean annual growth of Pinus thunbergii by age according to the gradients of the mean annual precipitation (P.avg, ), mean annual temperature (T.avg, ) and plot density (plot.den, trees ha-1) for 30 years from 1981 to 2009 61Figure 20 Mean annual growth of Fraxinus rhynchophylla by age according to the gradients of the mean annual precipitation (P.avg, ), mean annual temperature (T.avg, ) and plot density (plot.den, trees ha-1) for 30 years from 1981 to 2009 62Figure 21 Species-specific growth trends from 1981 to 2009 for 6 species. 64Figure 22 Temperature heat map. 67Figure 23 Precipitation heat map. 68Figure 24 Plot density heat map. 70Figure 25 Examples of the maximum allowable growth rate (A), Examples of the allowance for bark shrinkage-induced diameter reduction (B) 78Figure 26 Histogram of mortality rate and log transformed mortality rate. 86Figure 27 The number of alive trees, the number of dead trees, and mortality rate by diameter class. 88Figure 28 The number of alive trees, the number of dead trees, and mortality rate by diameter class. 90Figure 29 Distribution of standing and dead trees of six species by aspect during 1st period (NFI 5th-6th). 94Figure 30 Distribution of standing and dead trees of six species by slope during 1st period (NFI 5th-6th). 95Figure 31 Distribution of standing and dead trees of six species by altitude during 1st period (NFI 5th-6th). 96Figure 32 Distribution of standing and dead trees of six species during 1st period (NFI 5th-6th) by annual mean precipitation for the previous 5 years from the survey year. 99Figure 33 Distribution of standing and dead trees of six species during 1st period (NFI 5th-6th) by annual mean temperature for the previous 5 years from the survey year. 100Figure 34 Distribution of standing and dead trees of six species by moisture index during 1st period (NFI 5th-6th). 101Figure 35 Distribution of standing and dead trees of six species by stand quadratic mean diameter during 1st period (NFI 5th-6th). 103Figure 36 Distribution of standing and dead trees of six species by stand density during 1st period (NFI 5th-6th). 104Figure 37 Distribution of standing and dead trees of six species by competition index during 1st period (NFI 5th-6th). 105Figure 38 Mean DBH of dead trees during 1st period (NFI 5th-6th) by competition index. 108Figure 39 Mean DBH of dead trees during 1st period (NFI 5th-6th) by moisture index. 111AppendixAppendix figure 1 Plot density heat map with same range as growth pattern analysis. 145Appendix figure 2 Growth trend of Larix kaempferi, Pinus koraiensis, and Robinia pseudoacacia. 145Appendix figure 3 Distribution of standing and dead trees of six species by aspect during 2nd period (NFI 6th-7th). 146Appendix figure 4 Distribution of standing and dead trees of six species by slope during 2nd period (NFI 6th-7th). 147Appendix figure 5 Distribution of standing and dead trees of six species by altitude during 2nd period (NFI 6th-7th). 148Appendix figure 6 Distribution of standing and dead trees of six species during 2nd period (NFI 6th-7th) by annual mean precipitation for the previous 5 years from the survey year. 149Appendix figure 7 Distribution of standing and dead trees of six species during 2nd period (NFI 6th-7th) by annual mean temperature for the previous 5 years from the survey year. 150Appendix figure 8 Distribution of standing and dead trees of six species by moisture index during 2nd period (NFI 6th-7th). 151Appendix figure 9 Distribution of standing and dead trees of six species by stand quadratic mean diameter during 2nd period (NFI 6th-7th). 152Appendix figure 10 Distribution of standing and dead trees of six species by stand density during 2nd period (NFI 6th-7th). 153Appendix figure 11 Distribution of standing and dead trees of six species by competition index during 2nd period (NFI 6th-7th). 154
0