메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
부산경남사학회 역사와경계 역사와경계 제51집
발행연도
2004.6
수록면
111 - 143 (33page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
One of the most significant features of modern society is that people gather together on a large scale on the basis of similar purposes or motives without knowing each other. There had been a lot of occasions where hundreds or thousands of people gathered together at the same place both in colonial Chosun and colonial Taiwan. The most exemplary occasion of people's gathering both in Chosun and Taiwan would be the expositions. This paper compare those expositions held in Chosun and Taiwan with each other focusing on the exposition held in Chosun in 1929 and the exposition held in Taiwan in 1935 and through which further examine the different aspects of the realities of colonies. The mobilization of people by the colonial authority was not confined to the military or public works. Exposition was a more roundabout way of mobilizing people. Exposition was such an occasion as collected new, curious and exciting stuffs and made people gather together of their own volition and spend money in such a way as they were informed of through the advertisement of mass-media. In the sense that expositions sponsored by the state authority mobilized people not by compulsory means, but by providing more persuasive and exciting atmosphere that could attract voluntary participation, it could be considered to be a more cleverly devised ruling mechanism. Making the best use of every possible characters and moving images, large scale advertisement drove people into the excitement of expositions. People who showed up in expositions were not what they had been in the past any more, cause they did so as mass consumers. Such massive and voluntary participation was due to the cleverness of the mobilization mechanism that made up the exposition. The word cleverness here was another expression of the ability to have a thorough grasp of people's need and instinct, awaken their latent desires and magnify them. The mechanism was very similar to that of contemporary mass consumption society, where advertisement and department stores ceaselessly incites people's desires for more expanded consumption. Seen from such an aspect, Chosun Exposition and Taiwan Exposition that had been held every six years were almost the same with each other in their characters. However, people's attitude toward expositions appeared quite differently. In hosting expositions, the purpose of publicizing the achievement of the colonial government toward the Japanese central government was more decisive in Taiwan than in Chosun. In Chosun, intellectuals were very critical about expositions, while in Taiwan, intellectuals were rather disappointed by the indifference of the people in mainland China. The Taiwanese people understood Chosun so well as to set up some sort of stereotyped images of Chosun on their own, while the Chosun people were quite indifferent to Taiwan. The difference of political situation between Chosun and Taiwan before the Japanese colonial rule, that is, Chosun's being an independent sovereign state and Taiwan's being a local province under the rule of Ching empire, resulted in the different attitudes of people toward expositions. The difference between being a sovereign state and being a local province before colonialization brought forth another difference in the lives of colonial people. As Chosun was a sovereign state, she had her capital within her territory and the capital became the center of colonial rule. All the advanced civilization came into the capital city of Seoul and almost all of central governmental institutions such as business organizations, modern cultural facilities and modern educational system were concentrated in the capital city. Those expositions held in Seoul were the good examples. People from countryside were amazed by the speedy railways, busy streets and shops, mesh of electrical wires, streams of trams, coaches and bicycles going back and forth, etc. The gap between the capital city and local provinces widened even under the colonial rule. However, nationalism based on the opposition between the Chosun people and the Japanese did not allow any room for the recognition of regional gaps between the capital city and local provinces. Things were quite different in Taiwan. In Taiwan, people felt the obvious contradiction between the capital city and local provinces. Those Japanese people living in Taiwan strengthened their identity through such an expression of “Our Taiwan”. The word “Our Taiwan” was a term used to distinguish between the Japanese people living in Japan proper and those in Taiwan. Such consciousness made the Japanese people in Taiwan resort to the Taiwanese-centered decisions when their interest was in conflict with that of the Japanese colonial authority. In other words, they pursued policies or strategies favorable to Taiwan and not Japan proper, when Taiwan and Japan proper were put into conflicting interests. Such phenomenon was found even in the Taiwan Exposition. Those Japanese in Taiwan regarded the Taiwan Exposition as a commodity market in colonial Taiwan and criticized that eight tenth of the total money invested in the exposition flew not into Taiwan, but into Japan. The basic contradiction was not between the Japanese and the Taiwanese, but those Japanese in Japan proper and those in Taiwan.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말

Ⅱ. 박람회 개최의 목적과 홍보

Ⅲ. 박람회에 대한 반응과 감각

Ⅳ. 박람회 속의 상호인식과 自我表出

Ⅴ. 맺음말

【Abstract】

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-014462732