지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2001.6
- 수록면
- 89 - 95 (7page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Taiwan Expo on October 10, 1935 was not much different from todays big events as well as very modernistic. The Exposition included many local pavilions such as Tokyo pavilion(東京館), Osaka pavilion(大?館) and Cho-sun pavilion(朝鮮館). The Taiwan pavilion (台?館) was located in remote place during the 5th Osaka National Industrial Exposition (第五??業博物館?,1903). It implies Taiwan's position as the first colony of japan. Afterward the Colony pavilions came to be a sort of japanese Expositions requisite to satisfy japanese exotic taste and were means of making colonists identity with people of the empire. A number of pavilions for japanese cities, which were built in colonys expositions reflected the trade of labor and material between japan and host country and the strict demarcation between the colonies pavilions and japanese had disappeared in colony expositions.
There was no japanese city pavilion in Taiwan Product Exhibition (台?共進?) in 1916, what matters for Taiwanese is not any local area but japan itself as motherland at that time. However, Every japanese city pavilion was established in Taiwan Expo 20 years later. Which means that Taiwan had progressed in Japanization and then industrialized regions had pursued to expand their markets to the non-industrialized. The findings derived from the city pavilions in Taiwan Expo is that the main industrialized cities represented japan by the equation, japan = modern civilization. The east-north region was, so to speak, not included in japanese modern civilization. Osaka and Tokyo were called as The oriental leading city of commerce and industry and The spearhead of culture. That caused reaction of Taiwanese intellectuals. While Kyoto and Nara pavilion displayed the tradition, which premised the existence of Tokyo and Osaka pavilions symbolizing the modem civilization.
There mayor may not be a distinction between regions images desired to show and to see. The former was Manchuria pavilion(滿洲館) and the later was Cho-sun pavilion(朝鮮館) in Taiwan Expo. The distinction was decided by the economic factors. What Taiwanese wanted to find about Cho-sun is not the administrative work of Cho-sun colonial governor (朝鮮?督府) or the attractive sites but the real situation of media, the autonomy issue and peoples cultural activities.
The South Area pavilion(南方館) had different regional images according to the host. That it is not found in other expositions, confirmed the position of Taiwan in japan Empire as The strongpoint for expansion to the South China and South-East Asia .. Fujian pavilion(福建館) in the South Area pavilion implies that there were interchanges between local governments when the international conflict was severe. The exotic South Area pavilion contrasted Taiwan as modern and South-East Asia as tradition. To represent modern Taiwan was where Taiwanese Orientalism emerged.
There was no japanese city pavilion in Taiwan Product Exhibition (台?共進?) in 1916, what matters for Taiwanese is not any local area but japan itself as motherland at that time. However, Every japanese city pavilion was established in Taiwan Expo 20 years later. Which means that Taiwan had progressed in Japanization and then industrialized regions had pursued to expand their markets to the non-industrialized. The findings derived from the city pavilions in Taiwan Expo is that the main industrialized cities represented japan by the equation, japan = modern civilization. The east-north region was, so to speak, not included in japanese modern civilization. Osaka and Tokyo were called as The oriental leading city of commerce and industry and The spearhead of culture. That caused reaction of Taiwanese intellectuals. While Kyoto and Nara pavilion displayed the tradition, which premised the existence of Tokyo and Osaka pavilions symbolizing the modem civilization.
There mayor may not be a distinction between regions images desired to show and to see. The former was Manchuria pavilion(滿洲館) and the later was Cho-sun pavilion(朝鮮館) in Taiwan Expo. The distinction was decided by the economic factors. What Taiwanese wanted to find about Cho-sun is not the administrative work of Cho-sun colonial governor (朝鮮?督府) or the attractive sites but the real situation of media, the autonomy issue and peoples cultural activities.
The South Area pavilion(南方館) had different regional images according to the host. That it is not found in other expositions, confirmed the position of Taiwan in japan Empire as The strongpoint for expansion to the South China and South-East Asia .. Fujian pavilion(福建館) in the South Area pavilion implies that there were interchanges between local governments when the international conflict was severe. The exotic South Area pavilion contrasted Taiwan as modern and South-East Asia as tradition. To represent modern Taiwan was where Taiwanese Orientalism emerged.
목차
문제의 제기
1. 박람회 공간 속의 지역 배치
2. 일본지역관
3. 조선관과 만주관
4. 南方館
영문초록
일문초록
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
CLASS STRUCTURE AND CLASS MOBILITY IN EAST ASIA : A COMPARISON AMONG SOUTH KOREA,JAPAN AND TAIWAN
Journal of Asian Sociology
1994 .12
-
중화민국과 대만사이 : 하나의 역사, 복수의 역사학
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2017 .07
-
한·대만 관계 26주년 회고와 전망
대만연구
2018 .12
-
대만의 전략적 중요성 : 한국의 시각
대만연구
2018 .12
-
아시아 대중문화 지형과 한국의 대만 드라마 수용의 맥락
아세아연구
2011 .06
-
Taiwan Takes On China ... and Wins
Global Asia
2010 .12
-
日帝統治 前期 臺灣에서의 民事法制의 變革 : 法院制度 및 慣習法을 중심으로
법사학연구
2012 .10
-
일제말 문학 속에 나타난 한국 지식인의 동남아 인식
동남아연구
2011 .01
-
韓國社會의 南南葛藤 : 現況과 課題
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2007 .11
-
한국전쟁과 타이완(台灣)의 지위
아세아연구
2013 .09
-
Development Cooperation for Economic Integration of East and South Asia
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2008 .12
-
한국인의 대만 인식: 대중문화 경험을 중심으로
대만연구
2017 .06
-
전후 동아시아의 교육개혁 비교 연구 - 한국ㆍ대만ㆍ일본을 중심으로 -
한국초등교육
2014 .01
-
중국의 태평양도서국 정책: 타이완의 국제적 고립화 전략을 중심으로
Journal of North Korea Studies
2019 .01
-
日本帝國의 통치원리 ‘내지연장주의’와 帝國法制의 구조적 전개
법사학연구
2006 .04
-
〈부산행〉은 왜 대만 관람객에게 인기인가? : 대만 관람객의 평가와 경험을 중심으로
사회과학연구
2017 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
식민지기 박람회 연구 시각과 지역성 : 1929년 조선박람회를 중심으로
김제정
도시연구
2013
.06
식민지권력의 두 가지 얼굴 - 조선박람회(1929년)와 대만박람회(1935년)의 비교 -
하세봉
역사와경계
2004
.06
[한국적 근대는 어떻게 만들어졌나] 박람회-과시·선전·계몽·소비의 체험공간
신주백
역사비평
2004
.05
도시와 국가 욕망의 변주곡 : ‘도시’ 이념과 상하이 세계박람회
홍준형
중국문화연구
2014
.05
자포니즘(Japonisme)의 근원과 1867년 파리 만국박람회 : 프랑스 모더니즘 형성 시기 일본 미술의 수용 과정과 전시 고찰
신상철
서양미술사학회논문집
2014
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-014956787