메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
부산경남사학회 역사와경계 역사와경계 제53집
발행연도
2004.12
수록면
1 - 39 (39page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article aims to look about the transition of recognition of Parhae and Parhae descendants in Koryo. Conclusively, it is clear that the recognition had been gone changes according to the internal and external circumstances and the individual positions, though they does not be classified explicitly by the time. In early times of Koryo, there were tendencies to include Parhae into Korean history. Most notably, the consciousness of kind appeared remarkably under the reign of Taejo. Some has noticed that Parhae was merely a neighbouring country bordering Koryo in that time. But Koryo had the sense of homogeneity enough to comprehend a large number of Parhae descendants. At the same time, it seems that Choi Seung-Ro shared Taejo's notion of Parhae and Parhae descendants, since he had appreciated the policies of Taejo. Thus, the reason that Koryo did not meet five times aid requests of Heungryokuk established by Parhae descendants would be a result of Koryo's foreign policy which attached great importance to the actual profits. In the middle times of Koryo, the competing recognition of Parhae and Parhae descendants appeared in 12th century. Seo-Keung recognised Parhae to be a part of Korean history in his Koryodokyeong, whereas Kim Boo-Sik did not include it in Korean history in his Samkuksaki. The remarkable fact is that Yoon Eon-I who had lived at the same time as Kim Boo-Sik comprehended Parhae into Korean history in opposition to him. On the other hand, Koryo did not regard Daeparhae established by Ko Young-Chang to be a same blood. In short, it is probable that Koryo's sympathy with Parhae descendants had been increasingly weakened over time. In the late times of Koryo, those recognition had been varied. As for Ilyeon, he recognised Parhae as a part of Korean history according to his Yeokdaeyeonpyo and Samkukyoosa, even if there were questionable parts. In comparison with Ilyeon, Lee Seung-Hyu not only regarded Parhae as a heir of Kokuryo, but treated heavily the exiles into Koryo of Parhae descendants. A special case is Lee Je-Hyun, who at first had resembled the notion of Choi Seung-Ro but gradually rather changed it. And the prose collections of Lee Saek, Cheong Mong-Ju, etc., show that they also comprehended Parhae as a part of Korean history. On the contrary, Choi Hae who had been influenced by Choi Chi-Won tended to exclude Parhae from Korean history.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말

Ⅱ. 초기의 동류 의식

Ⅲ. 중기의 인식 변화

Ⅳ. 후기의 다양한 인식 태도

Ⅴ. 맺음말

【Abstract】

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-014462823