지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is intended to study comparing a book of『Heavenly Mandate(Cheon Myeong)』 with an opera of 『Cheon Myeong』. It seems that I found each work represented the thought of Donghak over 『Cheon Myeong(天命)』was produced by Son Jin-check as well as revealed the thought of that through 『Cheon Myeong』 by Kim Young-oak.
Especially, there are three kinds of aspects in these works.
One of them is main characters who were highlighted leaders of Donghak Jeon Bong-jun and Choi Si-hyung and their state of doings. Firstly, Jeon Bong-jun who is the revolutionist of the Donghak Revolution showed the hero of the times for this record of performances during one year which was taken place Donghak-led people's uprising in Gobu township, entry into Jeonju, negotiations as Jeonju Accord, management of Overseer's Office(Jibgangso) against the Corrupt Government, and the last bloody battle at Ugeumchi in Gongju with him. At last he was captured and executed by government troops on both works. Secondly, Choi Si-hyung who has consciousness of the Creation thought beyond the history of civilization was considered of the times. After all corresponding to Donghak Revolution he who was listened to heavenly mandate had commanded it.
Another is profoundly depicted both main characters bearing the impress of perceiver in this book. It seems to me that the writer has objectivity and balance about two characters against how to acknowledge just one character. He has recognized historical meanings and consciousness of the history of civilization about them. All the more Son's opera which transfigured Kim's work opened out spectator's mind to new aspects of understanding Donghak thought. On the whole the writer, the producer, dance directors, korean classical musicians, and so on various artists collaborated to express exposition more sublimating Donghak thought, figures and culture than those of the existing works.
The other is described a point of view culture from people juxtaposed the times of agitation in the late Joseon Dynasty. The crowed were pursued consciousness of the culture as Donghak thought and religion with Kalchum(The Sword Dance), Jumun(Incantation of What I serve God with in me) and contents of Bible(Donghak Scripture) in these works.
In conclusion, Kim Young-oak represented an expert's eye for Donghak whose meaning is came out the juxtaposition of the history with the history of civilization. In addition to Son Jin-check produced the opera within mixing together how to express and what to mean. It was Kim Young-oak that expressed Donghak thought after considering three lines as history, religion and the people in 『Heavenly Mandate(Cheon Myeong)』.
Especially, there are three kinds of aspects in these works.
One of them is main characters who were highlighted leaders of Donghak Jeon Bong-jun and Choi Si-hyung and their state of doings. Firstly, Jeon Bong-jun who is the revolutionist of the Donghak Revolution showed the hero of the times for this record of performances during one year which was taken place Donghak-led people's uprising in Gobu township, entry into Jeonju, negotiations as Jeonju Accord, management of Overseer's Office(Jibgangso) against the Corrupt Government, and the last bloody battle at Ugeumchi in Gongju with him. At last he was captured and executed by government troops on both works. Secondly, Choi Si-hyung who has consciousness of the Creation thought beyond the history of civilization was considered of the times. After all corresponding to Donghak Revolution he who was listened to heavenly mandate had commanded it.
Another is profoundly depicted both main characters bearing the impress of perceiver in this book. It seems to me that the writer has objectivity and balance about two characters against how to acknowledge just one character. He has recognized historical meanings and consciousness of the history of civilization about them. All the more Son's opera which transfigured Kim's work opened out spectator's mind to new aspects of understanding Donghak thought. On the whole the writer, the producer, dance directors, korean classical musicians, and so on various artists collaborated to express exposition more sublimating Donghak thought, figures and culture than those of the existing works.
The other is described a point of view culture from people juxtaposed the times of agitation in the late Joseon Dynasty. The crowed were pursued consciousness of the culture as Donghak thought and religion with Kalchum(The Sword Dance), Jumun(Incantation of What I serve God with in me) and contents of Bible(Donghak Scripture) in these works.
In conclusion, Kim Young-oak represented an expert's eye for Donghak whose meaning is came out the juxtaposition of the history with the history of civilization. In addition to Son Jin-check produced the opera within mixing together how to express and what to mean. It was Kim Young-oak that expressed Donghak thought after considering three lines as history, religion and the people in 『Heavenly Mandate(Cheon Myeong)』.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ.「天命」에 수용된 동학의 정신
Ⅲ.「天命」에 수용된 동학의 문화
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
동학과 유교의 관련성에 대한 검토
역사연구
2014 .12
-
Donghak and Donghak Movement
동학연구
2002 .02
-
‘생명’의 관점에서 본 동학사상사
역사연구
2015 .06
-
동학 콘텐츠의 현황과 전망
신종교연구
2018 .01
-
유교지식인의 東學 인식과 대응
역사연구
2014 .12
-
Donghak : Towards Life and Spirituality
Korea Journal
2002 .12
-
동학가사에 나타난 근대의식과 남녀평등
어문학
2018 .06
-
동학의 극문학적 조명 : 김용옥의 「天命」과 「開闢」을 중심으로
동학연구
2007 .03
-
동학(東學)의 정의 이해 : 주체론적 관점에서
종교연구
2014 .03
-
동학과 천도교의 타자로서의 서양 인식
HOMO MIGRANS
2010 .11
-
동학농민혁명 기념사업의 역사적 전개와 과제
역사연구
2015 .06
-
Cheondogyo and the Donghak Revolution : The (un)Making of a Religion
Korea Journal
2004 .06
-
『동학사』의 제1차 동학농민전쟁 전개과정에 대한 서술 내용분석
한국사연구
2015 .09
-
The Donghak Religion and the Modernization of Korea- With a Focus on the Donghak Peasant War -
담론201
2005 .01
-
동학농민혁명 지역별 사례 연구의 성과와 전망
역사연구
2014 .12
-
동학의 자생적 근대성: 해월 최시형의 인간관과 세계관을 중심으로
신학과 철학
2020 .01
-
동학농민전쟁에 대한 역사교과서 서술 내용의 새로운 모색 : 동아시아적 시각과 ‘나눔과 배려’의 정신을 중심으로
역사와 담론
2012 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-809-014498842