지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Kim Chun-su presented the "nonsense" as his own unique poetic theory, but it is mostly a rewording of Surrealist poetics. Therefore it cannot be said to be his own poetic theory. His poetic theory is ridden with problems.
First, Kim Chun-su describes his poems as 'poems without a meaning' but in a strict sense, there are no such poems that do not have a meaning. What he means by it, is that his poems take 'subjective conceptions' as its subject and expresses it in a subjective manner.
Second, Kim Chun-su presents the concept of 'poetry of non object' as his original poetics, but it is actually what Avant-garde art, and its successor, post-modern art, both strive to achieve. Therefore no one person can claim it to be his/her own poetics.
Third, 'nonsense poetry' is the name of a genre in Western Literature, and therefore cannot be used in a personal way by any single poet.
Fourth, what Kim Chun-su means by the word 'sense' is not the same as 'meaning' of a phenomenologist, or 'significance' of a structuralist. It is a concept closer to that of general semantics or that of Post-structuralists such as Deleuze. However, the poet himself does not specify this, and therefore invites misconception.
Fifth, accordingly, Kim Chun-su's concept of 'nonsense' should be understood from the point of view of general semantics or In Deleuze's sense of the word.
Sixth, the extent of which 'nonsense' is achieved in Kim Chun-su's poems could be said to be at a mediocre stage. Therefore his poems do not meet the standards required of 'nonsense poetry' in the Western sense of the word.
Seventh, Kim Chun-su's 'nonsense poetry' is different from what is meant by it in the Western literary scene. In short, it simply means the picturesque description of the unconscious via language. However, since his poems call forth the intervention of the aesthetic consciousness, his poems are not Surrealist but its variant.
Eighth, Kim Chun-su often talks of ambiguous and contradictory things in an abstract manner, consequently arousing much discussion among critics. As a result, the poet was able to secure his place in Korea's literary world as an important poet.
First, Kim Chun-su describes his poems as 'poems without a meaning' but in a strict sense, there are no such poems that do not have a meaning. What he means by it, is that his poems take 'subjective conceptions' as its subject and expresses it in a subjective manner.
Second, Kim Chun-su presents the concept of 'poetry of non object' as his original poetics, but it is actually what Avant-garde art, and its successor, post-modern art, both strive to achieve. Therefore no one person can claim it to be his/her own poetics.
Third, 'nonsense poetry' is the name of a genre in Western Literature, and therefore cannot be used in a personal way by any single poet.
Fourth, what Kim Chun-su means by the word 'sense' is not the same as 'meaning' of a phenomenologist, or 'significance' of a structuralist. It is a concept closer to that of general semantics or that of Post-structuralists such as Deleuze. However, the poet himself does not specify this, and therefore invites misconception.
Fifth, accordingly, Kim Chun-su's concept of 'nonsense' should be understood from the point of view of general semantics or In Deleuze's sense of the word.
Sixth, the extent of which 'nonsense' is achieved in Kim Chun-su's poems could be said to be at a mediocre stage. Therefore his poems do not meet the standards required of 'nonsense poetry' in the Western sense of the word.
Seventh, Kim Chun-su's 'nonsense poetry' is different from what is meant by it in the Western literary scene. In short, it simply means the picturesque description of the unconscious via language. However, since his poems call forth the intervention of the aesthetic consciousness, his poems are not Surrealist but its variant.
Eighth, Kim Chun-su often talks of ambiguous and contradictory things in an abstract manner, consequently arousing much discussion among critics. As a result, the poet was able to secure his place in Korea's literary world as an important poet.
목차
1. 머리말
2. ‘의미‘의 의미
3. 비대상의 허구
4. ‘무의미‘의 문제
5. 시에서 드러난 무의미
6. ‘무의미시‘의 실체
7. 초현실주의 아류로서의 무의미시
8. 결어
참고문헌
영문초록
참고문헌 (9)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Four Poems by Kim Chun-su
Korea Journal
1967 .10
-
김춘수 ‘무의미시’의 제의(祭儀)적 성격 연구
한국시학연구
2016 .08
-
Three Poems by Kin Chun-su
Korea Journal
1966 .03
-
김춘수의 대담 : 내면고백과 합리화의 유혹을 넘어서
어문학
2017 .12
-
김춘수 초기 시에서 나타난 존재론적 사유의 흔적
한국시학연구
2018 .08
-
김춘수 「꽃」의 인지시학적 연구 : 시의 구조와 의미의 가능성에 관하여
어문논총
2015 .06
-
김춘수의 포스트모더니즘 시
비평문학
2009 .06
-
시에 있어서의 미술과 음악 이론ㆍ기법의 차용 : 김춘수의 ｢이중섭｣ 연작을 중심으로
한국문학과 예술
2017 .03
-
1950년대 모더니즘시의 자아표출 방식 연구 : 김수영과 김춘수를 중심으로
한국시학연구
2008 .04
-
김춘수의 무의미시와 환상
문학교육학
2009 .01
-
김춘수 시의 상징주의적 해석
동악어문학
1997 .12
-
김춘수의 시에 나타난 프랑스 초현실주의의 수용 연구
외국문학연구
2018 .08
-
김춘수의 ‘무의미시’에 나타난 ‘무한이미지’의 성격
어문연구
2018 .01
-
김춘수 시론과 말라르메 시론의 비교 연구
우리문학연구
2015 .07
-
김춘수의 무의미시 〈하늘수박〉과 《금강경》
비평문학
2009 .03
-
무의미시(론)의 기원에 대한 재고 - 관념과 역사(이데올로기)의 공통 토대로서 재현적 사유
한국문예비평연구
2020 .01
-
문학적 무의미의 개념 및 유형에 관한 연구
어문학
2004 .12
-
김춘수와 도스토예프스키 (2) : 시작(詩作), 그리고 용서의 사상
어문학
2016 .12
-
김춘수 시 연구
우리말글
2001 .10
-
Ten Poems of Kim Su-yŏng
Korea Journal
1997 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-014538877