메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국어문학회 어문학 어문학 통권 제88호
발행연도
2005.6
수록면
1 - 27 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The results of this study are as follows :
a) Many scholars have so far either considered the alternations of (a) namo~namk (b) norΛ~nol (c) hΛrΛ~hΛll (d) azΛ~az as a simple k-addition or explained the lexical alternations by reconstructing wrong lexical forms. Their approach failed to describe the phoneme combination rules in the 15th century Korean.
b) In the 15th century Korean, the consonant 'ㄱ' was dropped when it appeared between :
(a) ㄹ and vowels
(b) ㅁ and vowels
(c) ㄴ and vowels
(d) ㅅ and vowels
Though it is difficult to phonologically describe the (d) case, historical evidence clearly show that 'ㄱ' was dropped between ㅅ and vowels at the time.
c) According to the cases mentioned above, (a) namo~namk, (b) norΛ~nol, (c) hΛrΛ~hΛll, (d) azΛ~az represented (a) namo~namgɨ (b) norΛ~nolgΛ, (c) hΛrΛ~hΛlgΛ, (d) azΛ~asgΛ respectively. In addition, for all of the four alternations, the latter part of each pair without 'ㄱ' was equivalent of the former part.
d) In the 15th century, 'z(ㅿ)' appeared only between voiced sounds in which it was interchangeable with 's(ㅅ)' in many cases. In other words, 'z(ㅿ)' was not distinctive from 's(ㅅ)' and was not used as an independent phoneme, but as an allophone of 's(ㅅ)' at the time.
e) If the Korean tone is included as part of the phonetic system and phonotactic constraints, the four lexical alternations may be considered as automatic alternation.

목차

1. 머리말

2. 선행 연구의 검토

3. ‘ㄱ‘ 탈락 환경

4. 문제의 해결

5. 맺음말

참고문헌

저자소개

Abstract

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-017799430