지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The results of this study are as follows :
a) Many scholars have so far either considered the alternations of (a) namo~namk (b) norΛ~nol (c) hΛrΛ~hΛll (d) azΛ~az as a simple k-addition or explained the lexical alternations by reconstructing wrong lexical forms. Their approach failed to describe the phoneme combination rules in the 15th century Korean.
b) In the 15th century Korean, the consonant 'ㄱ' was dropped when it appeared between :
(a) ㄹ and vowels
(b) ㅁ and vowels
(c) ㄴ and vowels
(d) ㅅ and vowels
Though it is difficult to phonologically describe the (d) case, historical evidence clearly show that 'ㄱ' was dropped between ㅅ and vowels at the time.
c) According to the cases mentioned above, (a) namo~namk, (b) norΛ~nol, (c) hΛrΛ~hΛll, (d) azΛ~az represented (a) namo~namgɨ (b) norΛ~nolgΛ, (c) hΛrΛ~hΛlgΛ, (d) azΛ~asgΛ respectively. In addition, for all of the four alternations, the latter part of each pair without 'ㄱ' was equivalent of the former part.
d) In the 15th century, 'z(ㅿ)' appeared only between voiced sounds in which it was interchangeable with 's(ㅅ)' in many cases. In other words, 'z(ㅿ)' was not distinctive from 's(ㅅ)' and was not used as an independent phoneme, but as an allophone of 's(ㅅ)' at the time.
e) If the Korean tone is included as part of the phonetic system and phonotactic constraints, the four lexical alternations may be considered as automatic alternation.
a) Many scholars have so far either considered the alternations of (a) namo~namk (b) norΛ~nol (c) hΛrΛ~hΛll (d) azΛ~az as a simple k-addition or explained the lexical alternations by reconstructing wrong lexical forms. Their approach failed to describe the phoneme combination rules in the 15th century Korean.
b) In the 15th century Korean, the consonant 'ㄱ' was dropped when it appeared between :
(a) ㄹ and vowels
(b) ㅁ and vowels
(c) ㄴ and vowels
(d) ㅅ and vowels
Though it is difficult to phonologically describe the (d) case, historical evidence clearly show that 'ㄱ' was dropped between ㅅ and vowels at the time.
c) According to the cases mentioned above, (a) namo~namk, (b) norΛ~nol, (c) hΛrΛ~hΛll, (d) azΛ~az represented (a) namo~namgɨ (b) norΛ~nolgΛ, (c) hΛrΛ~hΛlgΛ, (d) azΛ~asgΛ respectively. In addition, for all of the four alternations, the latter part of each pair without 'ㄱ' was equivalent of the former part.
d) In the 15th century, 'z(ㅿ)' appeared only between voiced sounds in which it was interchangeable with 's(ㅅ)' in many cases. In other words, 'z(ㅿ)' was not distinctive from 's(ㅅ)' and was not used as an independent phoneme, but as an allophone of 's(ㅅ)' at the time.
e) If the Korean tone is included as part of the phonetic system and phonotactic constraints, the four lexical alternations may be considered as automatic alternation.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 선행 연구의 검토
3. ‘ㄱ‘ 탈락 환경
4. 문제의 해결
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
저자소개
Abstract
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한ㅅ자의 닳이 이르는 음
동인지
1927 .07
-
국어의 격교체 구문 연구
한국어학
2003 .02
-
언어와 문ㅅ자(2)
동인지
1927 .07
-
언어와 문ㅅ자(1)
동인지
1927 .06
-
A cyclic optimality analysis of polish vowel alternation
음성음운형태론연구
2006 .12
-
Locative Alternation in English Is Not a Syntactic Alternation
언어학
2005 .04
-
의미론적 이형태의 타당성 : ‘에’와 ‘에게’의 교체를 중심으로
언어학 연구
2014 .10
-
사잇소리 'ㅅ'과 형태소 'ㅅ'에 대하여
국어교육연구
1980 .12
-
중세국어 형태론적 과정에서의 형태 교체 양상 : 모음 연결 제약의 관점에서
어문학
2017 .12
-
머리 ㅅ 말
한글
1946 .07
-
머리 ㅅ 말
한글
1946 .04
-
현대 국어의 사이ㅅ
언어학
1984 .04
-
중간언어 음운론을 위한 모음 연구
이중언어학
2004 .01
-
국어의 ‘p/k 교체’에 대하여
국어국문학
2011 .08
-
ㄱ자를 쓰는 밤 외 1편
문학들
2019 .05
-
English Alternations and Semantic Constraints
영어영문학연구
2002 .01
-
사이 ㅅ의 소리값
어문학
2000 .10
-
격의 교체와 차별
언어
2001 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-017799430