지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It was argued that poor corporate governance in the Republic of Korea led to moral hazard, high debt, and poor investment and management of firms, which in turn led to financial crisis of 1997 in Korea. Korea was caught in the financial crisis of 1997, and a host of seemingly statble companies suddenly experienced devere financial difficulties. Since 1998 the Korean Commercial Code and the Securities Exchange Act was reformed several times. Through the several reform of laws relating to corporate governance the system of governance resembles that of the United States. Criticism of newly introduced corporate governance was wide spread, since it was dramatically changed from the traditional Continental European system to American system.
This article analyse the operation of the newly introduce corporate governance in Korea referring to recent statistic, especially on Outside Directors, Auditor Committee System, Internal Control System, Cumulative Voting, Voting by Mail and Voting by Electronic Transmission at the shareholder's meeting.
Passed 6 years since the New Corporate Governance was enforced, the evaluation of the new system has been in Pros and Cons. The Pros has insisted the American Style Corporate Governance has approached to Global Standard. The Cons has refuted that its' enforcement has theocratically been contradictory, and the function hasn't effectively operated under this system that is supervised by the execution organization.
Referred to the previous tables, the supporting ratio of agenda in the Board of Directors of the Outside Directors comes to about 97 percent. Accordingly, the evaluation of the above tables is supposed actually to merely rubber stamp for the Board of Directors, the deficiency of the independency and specialty and lack of the understanding on management. In case of the Audit Committee, it is seemed to be general application at the point of numbers because the introduction is up to the company by the mandatory articles of incorporation. However, though the Outside Directors made up 74.3 percent among the Total Audit Committee, there seems to be many problems of the Constant Audit because the Outside Directors don't work in full time as their position.
Now, what the Corporate Governance is operating without any conflicts is due not to the Corporate Governance's own superiority but the international management in the Large Corporation, the growth of corporate culture and the social atmosphere against the irregularities and corruption.
This article analyse the operation of the newly introduce corporate governance in Korea referring to recent statistic, especially on Outside Directors, Auditor Committee System, Internal Control System, Cumulative Voting, Voting by Mail and Voting by Electronic Transmission at the shareholder's meeting.
Passed 6 years since the New Corporate Governance was enforced, the evaluation of the new system has been in Pros and Cons. The Pros has insisted the American Style Corporate Governance has approached to Global Standard. The Cons has refuted that its' enforcement has theocratically been contradictory, and the function hasn't effectively operated under this system that is supervised by the execution organization.
Referred to the previous tables, the supporting ratio of agenda in the Board of Directors of the Outside Directors comes to about 97 percent. Accordingly, the evaluation of the above tables is supposed actually to merely rubber stamp for the Board of Directors, the deficiency of the independency and specialty and lack of the understanding on management. In case of the Audit Committee, it is seemed to be general application at the point of numbers because the introduction is up to the company by the mandatory articles of incorporation. However, though the Outside Directors made up 74.3 percent among the Total Audit Committee, there seems to be many problems of the Constant Audit because the Outside Directors don't work in full time as their position.
Now, what the Corporate Governance is operating without any conflicts is due not to the Corporate Governance's own superiority but the international management in the Large Corporation, the growth of corporate culture and the social atmosphere against the irregularities and corruption.
목차
Ⅰ. 序言
Ⅱ. 企業支配構造改善을 僞하여 導入된 制度들
Ⅲ. 運營實態
Ⅳ. 課題
Ⅴ. 結論
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (11)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Current Corporate Governance Structure in Korea (I)
기업법연구
2005 .06
-
Current Corporate Governance Structure in Korea (3)
기업법연구
2005 .12
-
美國의 會社支配構造 改善에 관한 최근 動向 : 理事會制度에 관한 논의를 중심으로
한림법학 FORUM
2001 .11
-
독일의 회사법제 운용경과와 시사점－최근 한국의 지배구조의 논의와 비교를 중심으로－
일감법학
2014 .01
-
일본의 회사지배구조에 대한 연구
경영법률
2008 .01
-
우리는 이사회에게 무엇을 기대할 것인가 - 이사회 실패 현상을 극복하기 위한 대안으로서 법인이사론을 중심으로 -
경영법률
2015 .01
-
한국형 기업지배구조의 바람직한 모습
일감법학
2014 .01
-
A Comparative Analysis of Corporate Governance Guidelines: Bangladesh Perspective
Asian Journal of Business Environment
2017 .01
-
한국 기업집단의 지배구조 개선방안 : 소유ㆍ지배구조 개선방안을 중심으로
한국사회와 행정연구
2005 .02
-
한국의 기업지배구조와 기업범죄
비교형사법연구
2013 .01
-
기업지배구조 개선을 위한 이사회 제도에 관한 고찰 : 미국제도 개선내용의 도입가능성 검토를 중심으로
비교사법
2010 .09
-
기업의 지배구조와 이사회의 운영(1)
동아법학
1999 .12
-
기업의 지배구조와 이사회의 운영(2)
동아법학
1999 .04
-
회사법상 이사회의 감독기능 강화에 관한 비교법적 검토(한국-일본) : 일본의 집행임원제 및 감사등위원회설치회사제도를 중심으로
법과기업연구
2014 .06
-
기업지배구조와 감사품질, 경영성과의 관련성에 대한 실증연구
국제회계연구
2011 .06
-
Association between Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance in Iran
유통과학연구
2013 .01
-
Board of Director Diversity and Corporate Performance: The Case of South Korea
Asian International Studies Review
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
개인과 팀 창의성, 수직적 통합이 성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증연구 : 한국 음반 산업을 대상으로
송경미
,
이진주
,
박남규
전략경영연구
2015
.12
연구개발(R&D) 투자를 통한 경쟁력 창출 : 경로의존성 및 자원특성의 역할
이재혁
,
양지원
전략경영연구
2015
.12
기업의 네트워크 특성이 기술협력 효과에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구
김현창
,
윤우진
전략경영연구
2015
.12
역량과 불확실성이 지식추구형 해외직접투자 시기에 미치는 영향 : 일본 제약/화학 다국적 기업의 해외연구소 설립을 중심으로
김상지
,
박연진
,
송재용
외 1명
전략경영연구
2015
.12
차등의결권제도의 도입과 상장
고창현
기업법연구
2015
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-017792481