지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The aim of this study is to establish the grammatical category of the morpheme followed after '이-' in Korean. The grammatical category of the morpheme followed after '이-' is put into the category of particle or ending in unabridged dictionary. But the grammatical category of the morpheme followed after '이-' has discussed arbitrary without distinction criteria of grammatical category.
The grammatical category of the morpheme followed after '이-' is bound up with grammaticalization of the form of ‘이-’ conjugation. If the form of '이-' conjugation was particlized, the grammatical category of the morpheme followed after '이-' is a particle or an ending. Whereas if the form of '이-' conjugation was not particlized, the grammatical category of the morpheme followed after '이-' is only an ending.
The distinction criteria are needed to establish the grammatical category of the morpheme followed after '이-'. The distinction criteria are as follows :
a) In the form of '이-' conjugation if '이-' is an adjective, the grammatical category of the morpheme followed after '이-' is an ending. If '이-' combines with prefinal ending, '이-' is an adjective.
b) In the form of '이-' conjugation if '이-' is not an adjective, the morpheme followed after '이-' is particlized with '이-'. Such '이-' functions as intermediation vowel.
c) When the morpheme followed after ‘이-’ functions like a conjunction, if the morpheme interlink noun phrases, then the morpheme is a particle, or if the morpheme not interlink noun phrases, then the morpheme is an ending.
d) If the form of '이-' conjugation was particlized, this conjugation is substituted by other particles.
I come to the conclusion that '나' is a particle or an ending, '거나' is only an ending.
The grammatical category of the morpheme followed after '이-' is bound up with grammaticalization of the form of ‘이-’ conjugation. If the form of '이-' conjugation was particlized, the grammatical category of the morpheme followed after '이-' is a particle or an ending. Whereas if the form of '이-' conjugation was not particlized, the grammatical category of the morpheme followed after '이-' is only an ending.
The distinction criteria are needed to establish the grammatical category of the morpheme followed after '이-'. The distinction criteria are as follows :
a) In the form of '이-' conjugation if '이-' is an adjective, the grammatical category of the morpheme followed after '이-' is an ending. If '이-' combines with prefinal ending, '이-' is an adjective.
b) In the form of '이-' conjugation if '이-' is not an adjective, the morpheme followed after '이-' is particlized with '이-'. Such '이-' functions as intermediation vowel.
c) When the morpheme followed after ‘이-’ functions like a conjunction, if the morpheme interlink noun phrases, then the morpheme is a particle, or if the morpheme not interlink noun phrases, then the morpheme is an ending.
d) If the form of '이-' conjugation was particlized, this conjugation is substituted by other particles.
I come to the conclusion that '나' is a particle or an ending, '거나' is only an ending.
목차
1. 머리말
2. ‘이-‘의 범주
3. ‘이-‘ 후행 형태소의 범주 설정 기준
4. ‘나‘와 ‘거나‘의 범주
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
세대에 따른 구례 방언 문법 형태의 변화
국어문학
2017 .07
-
형태소와 문법 기술
어문학
2010 .09
-
한국어 문법 단위의 변화 유형에 대하여
한국사상과 문화
2005 .01
-
A Special Status of the Morpheme-initail [h]in Korean
언어과학
2005 .01
-
Korean EFL Learners’ Development of Inflectional Morphemes
언어학 연구
2017 .04
-
언어발달장애 아동의 문법형태소 산출
음성과학
2003 .09
-
On morpheme order : A generalized alignment perspective
음성음운형태론연구
2006 .12
-
한국어 다기능 형태소의 교수？학습 방법 연구
이중언어학
2007 .01
-
The Syntax of Pragmatic Morphemes in Korean
언어
1994 .06
-
언어학과 국어학 : 변형 생성 문법과 한국어 어미의 통사론
동서인문학
2016 .12
-
“VO1+O2”的类型和功能考察
외국학연구
2019 .01
-
음성 실현형 ‘–슴미–’와기저 구조 ‘–습–느–니––’
언어와 정보사회
2017 .01
-
Inflectional Morphemes in Relative Clauses
언어
1996 .03
-
기능어의 문법화
우리말글
2001 .12
-
『天理本狂言六義』에 나타나는 추량표현 - 조동사「べし」를 중심으로 -
일본어학연구
2020 .03
-
현대 중국어 형태소(morpheme)의 명칭, 정의문제
중국어문학논집
2003 .05
-
Development of the morpheme : mbo in American English
음성음운형태론연구
2008 .08
-
동사 접미 파생과 활용 개념의 부조화
한국어학
2015 .11
-
Overt and Covert Passive Morphemes
미래영어영문학회 학술대회 자료집
2017 .06
-
‘인가’의 문법 범주에 대하여
이중언어학
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-018152968