지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to explain the addressee-honorifics in Hangeul letters from the sixteenth century to the nineteenth century and show which levels the speaker uses toward the hearer in kin relationship.
The addressee-honorific system in Hangeul letters is simpler than that shown in published books. There are only three levels, the polite level ‘ha-na-i-da’, the middle level ‘ha-na-y’ and the plain level ‘ha-na-da’. In the case that there is a sharp distinction in the distance of kin relationship between the speaker and the hearer, the senior uses the plain level ‘ha-na-da’ and the junior uses the polite level ‘ha-na-i-da’ in general. For example, parents used the plain level toward their sons or daughters and sons and daughters used the polite level toward their parents. On the other hand, when the speaker and the hearer have somewhat equal-status in kin relationship such as siblings or husband and wife, the senior uses the middle level ‘ha-na-y’ and the junior uses the polite level or even can use the middle level. Similarly, when the speaker and the hearer are related by marriage and are opposite in gender, the speaker in high status cannot treat the hearer just as lower-status person but regards her/him as equal-status person by using the middle level ‘ha-na-y'.
In kin relationship, the distance of kin relationship is a major factor which classifies into the senior and the junior, and the age is just a secondary factor. It is also very important factor whether the speaker and the hearer have the blood relationship or relation by marriage and they have same gender or not. When the speaker and the hearer are related by marriage and are different in gender, the speaker in high status inclines to use the middle level or even the polite level toward the hearer in low status. It might be due to lack of intimacy.
The addressee-honorific system in Hangeul letters is simpler than that shown in published books. There are only three levels, the polite level ‘ha-na-i-da’, the middle level ‘ha-na-y’ and the plain level ‘ha-na-da’. In the case that there is a sharp distinction in the distance of kin relationship between the speaker and the hearer, the senior uses the plain level ‘ha-na-da’ and the junior uses the polite level ‘ha-na-i-da’ in general. For example, parents used the plain level toward their sons or daughters and sons and daughters used the polite level toward their parents. On the other hand, when the speaker and the hearer have somewhat equal-status in kin relationship such as siblings or husband and wife, the senior uses the middle level ‘ha-na-y’ and the junior uses the polite level or even can use the middle level. Similarly, when the speaker and the hearer are related by marriage and are opposite in gender, the speaker in high status cannot treat the hearer just as lower-status person but regards her/him as equal-status person by using the middle level ‘ha-na-y'.
In kin relationship, the distance of kin relationship is a major factor which classifies into the senior and the junior, and the age is just a secondary factor. It is also very important factor whether the speaker and the hearer have the blood relationship or relation by marriage and they have same gender or not. When the speaker and the hearer are related by marriage and are different in gender, the speaker in high status inclines to use the middle level or even the polite level toward the hearer in low status. It might be due to lack of intimacy.
목차
1. 서론
2. 조선시대 한글편지에 나타난 청자높임법 체계
3. 발신인과 수신인의 관계에 따른 청자높임법 사용 양상
4. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국어 경어법의 주요 기능
우리말글
2011 .08
-
선어말 어미 ‘-시-’의 청자 존대 기능에 대한 고찰
언어학 연구
2012 .04
-
국어 청자대우법의 체계화 문제
어문학
2007 .06
-
Empathy and Hearer-Based Honorifics in Korean
언어
1995 .12
-
지시어 ‘이, 그, 저’의 용법과 의미
언어
2016 .06
-
20세기 구어 자료에 나타난 하오체 어미 {-오}의 실현 양상 변화
한국어학
2015 .11
-
존재 there 구문에 나타난 한정성과 정보구조
영어영문학
2016 .02
-
'What is said' and speaker's meaning
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2006 .12
-
중국 연변지역 청자대우법 체계에 대한 초보적 고찰
이중언어학
2012 .01
-
한국어 대화상에서의 화자와 청자에 대한 지칭 표현
담화와인지
1999 .06
-
부가의문문 발화 행위에서 인식양태의 설정과 요청의 위계
담화와인지
2000 .12
-
청자의도(H-intentions)의 개념화와 방향성 연구 : 가족 담화를 중심으로
어학연구
2015 .12
-
結婚 移住 女性의 韓國語 要請 話行 使用 樣相 : 家族 間 意思疏通 狀況을 中心으로
어문론집
2009 .11
-
한국어 추측 표현의 화행 실현 양상과 교수학습 내용 연구
한국어학
2017 .08
-
화자를 활용한 시 교육 및 창작 연구
어문학
2006 .12
-
청자 존대 ‘-시-’의 종합적 검토
언어과학
2016 .01
-
Communication Strategies of Irony and Banter
언어과학연구
2002 .09
-
청자존대법 등급 설정과 분화에 대한 연구
어문학
2008 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-015184740