지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this article, the theory, which suggested that the Japanese authorities during the Japanese occupation period changed the original English version of the Name of this country, which was spelled as 'Corea', to a new version spelled as 'Korea', is critically reviewed. In this author's view, the name change was initiated by an independent attempt of the Joseon government and was established by a final decision(choice of words) led by the U.S..
When the country was opened to the outer world, and the Koreans had the opportunity to have a taste of the international society for the first time, the Joseon government(The Government of Chosen) was shocked to learn that the country was being referred to with the name of 'Corea', which would have undoubtedly come from the title of a certain fallen dynasty Goryeo('Korai'). The government insisted to be addressed as 'Chosen', and their request was duly recognized in the government's negotiations of establishing relations with the United States and Great Britain. A translater named Lowell, who was part of the 'Corean Special Mission', used 'Chosun' as the title of the country, and also used the word 'Chosunese' as well. But the Joseon government's request for the usage of such name lost some steam later on, and the response of the international society was less than expected, so the title 'Chosen' failed to obtain an internationally recognized status.
Outside the country, the title 'Corea' continued to be widely used, but during the mid-1880s a different version of the name of the country, namely 'Korea', emerged as well, and caused a certain level of confusion. For example, Park Jeong Yang(Pak Chung Yang), who was appointed to be the first minister of the Legation of Korea in U.S. in late 1887, used the name 'Korea' instead of 'Corea' which was being used by world great powers. After this, the name 'Korea' became the norm inside the Legation of Korea in terms of referring to the Korean peninsula, and that would have certainly influenced the U.S. government's choice of titles in conditions of referring to the Korean government. The U.S. government(the Department of State, to be exact) started to use that title in February 1891, and the minister of the U.S. Legation in Seoul, Heard, started to use 'Korea' in October the same year, marking the establishment of a new English title referring to the Korean country and the government.
When the country was opened to the outer world, and the Koreans had the opportunity to have a taste of the international society for the first time, the Joseon government(The Government of Chosen) was shocked to learn that the country was being referred to with the name of 'Corea', which would have undoubtedly come from the title of a certain fallen dynasty Goryeo('Korai'). The government insisted to be addressed as 'Chosen', and their request was duly recognized in the government's negotiations of establishing relations with the United States and Great Britain. A translater named Lowell, who was part of the 'Corean Special Mission', used 'Chosun' as the title of the country, and also used the word 'Chosunese' as well. But the Joseon government's request for the usage of such name lost some steam later on, and the response of the international society was less than expected, so the title 'Chosen' failed to obtain an internationally recognized status.
Outside the country, the title 'Corea' continued to be widely used, but during the mid-1880s a different version of the name of the country, namely 'Korea', emerged as well, and caused a certain level of confusion. For example, Park Jeong Yang(Pak Chung Yang), who was appointed to be the first minister of the Legation of Korea in U.S. in late 1887, used the name 'Korea' instead of 'Corea' which was being used by world great powers. After this, the name 'Korea' became the norm inside the Legation of Korea in terms of referring to the Korean peninsula, and that would have certainly influenced the U.S. government's choice of titles in conditions of referring to the Korean government. The U.S. government(the Department of State, to be exact) started to use that title in February 1891, and the minister of the U.S. Legation in Seoul, Heard, started to use 'Korea' in October the same year, marking the establishment of a new English title referring to the Korean country and the government.
목차
머리말
1. 일제조작설의 검토
2. 조선의 주체적 입장
3. 미국의 Korea 사용
4. Korea 용법의 보편화와 한계
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
남북 교류에 있어서의 종교의 역할과 전망 : 기독교를 중심으로
신학연구
2006 .06
-
‘한국’에 대한 영문표기는 Corea인가? Korea인가?
한국사상과 문화
2007 .01
-
한국 고전소설 작품명의 영문(英文)표기 고찰
우리문학연구
2013 .10
-
The Church of Christ in Corea
신학지남
1968 .03
-
[남북토론회]통일 국호는 'Corea'로
역사비평
2003 .11
-
English Loanwords in Titles of Korean Songs and Movies
신영어영문학
2018 .08
-
한국에서의 몽골사 연구
인문과학연구
1993 .05
-
What Really Determines Case Government in Old English?
어학연구
2000 .03
-
기능주의적 관점에서 본 소설 제목의 번역 - 하위 장르별 변환(shifts)현상을 중심으로 -
통역과 번역
2009 .01
-
번역된 소설 제목의 분석 : 등가와 기능
번역학연구
2016 .09
-
Government Reforms in Korea : Entrepreneurial Government or Democratic Government?
Korea Journal
1999 .06
-
한국 영화 제목의 러시아어 번역 양상에 대한 연구- 영어 제목과의 연관성을 고려하여
통역과 번역
2016 .01
-
Government and Politics of Korea
Korea Journal
1972 .10
-
徐霞客과 ≪徐霞客遊記≫ 연구(2) - 명칭과 체제 및 내용을 중심으로
중국문학
2007 .01
-
한 · 일 영화 타이틀의 네이밍에 관한 대조연구 : 양국의 흥행작을 중심으로
일본연구
2015 .02
-
외화제목의 번역규범에 관한 기술적(descriptive) 연구 : 2014년도 국내개봉 영미(英美) 영화를 중심으로
번역학연구
2016 .03
-
근ㆍ현대 한국인의 중국 인식(認識)과 중국인의 한국 인식 변화
중국문화연구
2006 .06
-
영화제목의 기능과 번역
통번역교육연구
2011 .01
-
駐美 朝鮮公使館 개설과 ‘자주외교’ 상징물 연구 : 공문서 및 사진자료 분석을 중심으로
역사민속학
2014 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-015220094