지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Eco-criticism occurred at the crisis of human's existence itself than by the pure yearning and compassion for 'nature'. But it has been gone through the concrete thinking procedures and finally arrived to demand the more fundamental epistemological awakening and a esthetic renovation. In short, now eco-criticism dreams of another revolution on the history of civilization and mentality which follows to "the Copernican revolution".
But eco-criticism have many problems in its logic and practical persuasive power. For example, we can ask as following; Can we clarify the distinction between A contemporary eco-criticism and all sorts of pro-nature thinking which has been in Eastern and Western conventional notion in traditions? How can we connect modern eco-criticism with the past pro-nature tradition? If eco-criticism at these days cannot be distinguished from the past pro-nature tradition, can we admit it's identity or it's reason for being? And can it present us creative vision that get out of easygoing romanticism, empty idealism, and a notion about nature is polluted with wrong ideology?
In the face of these difficult problems, eco-criticism have to answer very delicately and carefully. Most of all, it has possibility to be attack for the reason for excessive speciality on the one hand, and for abstract universality on the other. Therefore it will have to ask itself as following; Do we have to keep a position as a timely trend of thought through confining ourselves in narrow space like as 'materialism' or 'practical idea'? Or do we have to prove it's universal value by applying to many cultural fields so as philosophy, literature, arts, architecture etc., and by connecting past meaning texts freely with contemporary ones?
But I don't think that we are now at the crossroad to choose between the two. Most of all, I think we need to recognize some similarities and differences between the two, and then we can link each other by creative view which is fit for new demand of the times.
Besides, we have to something to answer as following: is the "life-centrism" of deep-ecologist "anti-humanism" so as M. Bookchin has been insist? Can we discriminate "nature" from "culture(or human)"?
At this paper, I made an attempt to answer these difficult and complexed questions and efforted to clarify natures of nature and culture. And I try to examine the meaning and the essence of 'eco-literature'. Especially, It is necessary to watch with deep concern literary "mimesis" as like Adorno's concepts in examining ecologic nature of literary text or ecologic approach to literature.
I hope this paper to be a solid base for a more creative discussion on eco-literature.
But eco-criticism have many problems in its logic and practical persuasive power. For example, we can ask as following; Can we clarify the distinction between A contemporary eco-criticism and all sorts of pro-nature thinking which has been in Eastern and Western conventional notion in traditions? How can we connect modern eco-criticism with the past pro-nature tradition? If eco-criticism at these days cannot be distinguished from the past pro-nature tradition, can we admit it's identity or it's reason for being? And can it present us creative vision that get out of easygoing romanticism, empty idealism, and a notion about nature is polluted with wrong ideology?
In the face of these difficult problems, eco-criticism have to answer very delicately and carefully. Most of all, it has possibility to be attack for the reason for excessive speciality on the one hand, and for abstract universality on the other. Therefore it will have to ask itself as following; Do we have to keep a position as a timely trend of thought through confining ourselves in narrow space like as 'materialism' or 'practical idea'? Or do we have to prove it's universal value by applying to many cultural fields so as philosophy, literature, arts, architecture etc., and by connecting past meaning texts freely with contemporary ones?
But I don't think that we are now at the crossroad to choose between the two. Most of all, I think we need to recognize some similarities and differences between the two, and then we can link each other by creative view which is fit for new demand of the times.
Besides, we have to something to answer as following: is the "life-centrism" of deep-ecologist "anti-humanism" so as M. Bookchin has been insist? Can we discriminate "nature" from "culture(or human)"?
At this paper, I made an attempt to answer these difficult and complexed questions and efforted to clarify natures of nature and culture. And I try to examine the meaning and the essence of 'eco-literature'. Especially, It is necessary to watch with deep concern literary "mimesis" as like Adorno's concepts in examining ecologic nature of literary text or ecologic approach to literature.
I hope this paper to be a solid base for a more creative discussion on eco-literature.
목차
Ⅰ. 기존 생태문학론의 반성
Ⅱ. 생태주의의 주요 쟁점들
Ⅲ. 문학에 대한 생태미학적 접근
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
창조적 비평 연구
우리말글
2003 .04
-
'공포의 윤리학'과 '섭식의 관계'
문학과환경
2003 .06
-
『문학과 환경』10년간 한국 생태시 연구의 성과와 과제 : ‘우주의 언어’ 읽기와 ‘인간의 언어’ 빚기
문학과환경
2012 .06
-
생명권력 시대의 생태시론 : 생태시론의 현황과 전망
비평문학
2008 .12
-
Methods of Criticism
Korea Journal
1980 .05
-
History of Literary Criticism in Korea
Korea Journal
1973 .07
-
생태비평에 대한 수사학적 분석 : 수사학의 ‘착상’ 개념을 중심으로
수사학
2005 .09
-
Some Characteristics of Chinese Literary Criticism
동아문화
1981 .08
-
1920년대 계급주의 아동문학 비평 연구 : 소년문예운동 방향전환론의 전개와 비평사적 의미
아동청소년문학연구
2008 .12
-
1960년대 신세대 비평가의 등장과 참여문학론-「 비평작업」의 비평사적 의의
한국문학논총
2008 .01
-
韓國開化期批評 樣相 硏究
우리문학연구
2004 .12
-
Footprints of Art Criticism in Korea : From Absence of Criticism to Ideological Criticism
Korea Journal
1986 .01
-
Trends in Criticism
Korea Journal
1979 .09
-
문인수 시에 나타난 생태론적 관심의 제 유형
문학과환경
2006 .06
-
동서양 문학비평 담론의 차이에 대한 고찰 : 李奎報의 詩論을 中心으로
아시아문화연구
2006 .02
-
Trends and Tasks of the Study of Literary Criticism in Korea
Korea Journal
1982 .10
-
한국 현대 생태시와 '물' 이미지
문학과환경
2006 .12
-
한국 현대소설에 나타난 생태의식의 한 양상-생태위기의 현실과 생태적 전망을 중심으로-
한국현대문학연구
2004 .12
-
극심한 기아 체험과 욕망 억제의 가능성 : 탈북 시인 장진성의 『내 딸을 백 원에 팝니다』를 중심으로
문학과환경
2009 .12
-
Man and Nature
인간연구
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
생태주의 문학 논의의 심화와 확장을 위하여
고인환
계간 시작
2004
.05
생태문학론 혹은 녹색문학론의 현황과 과제
남송우
오늘의 문예비평
1998
.09
시적 상상력과 종교다원주의 : 고진하의 시를 중심으로
나희덕
한국시학연구
2004
.11
[책에서 길어올린 풍경] 별이 된 강아지똥 - 권정생의『강아지똥』_길벗 어린이
한희철
기독교사상
2007
.07
나의 노래, 우리들의 노래(김익두 시집 『햇볕 쬐러 나오다가』, 신아출판사, 1990, 최성수 시집 『장다리꽃 같은 우리 아이들』, 실천문학사, 1990, 김신용 시집 『개같은 날들의 기록』, 세계사, 1990)
신경림
창작과비평
1990
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-015293775