지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Recently, there are many coherent corporations between dominant corporation and subordinated corporation. If two companies were formed the relation of controlled and subordinated corporation, the two companies can not but occur a lot of complicated problems. Particularly, when the dominant corporation exercise his power and occur damage against the subordinated corporation, we find out who is responsible for the results and who take an action against directors, officers and related parties.
By the traditional Corporate law, in such cases, the shareholders and the creditors of dominant corporation take the directors and the officers of their corporation to account for the wrongdoing or negligent act. On the contrary, the shareholders and the creditors of subordinated corporation also take the directors and the officers of their corporation to account for the such act. However, the shareholders and the creditors of subordinated corporation can not hold the responsibility for the such act on the directors and officers of the controlling corporation, not the subordinated corporation.
As gathered from the U.S. cases, if the dominant or majority stockholder exercises a controlling influence over the management or policies of the corporation or the transaction or conduct in question by virtue of the person's position as a shareholder, he must fulfill his fiduciary duty as a trustee. Furthermore, to keep such duty is satisfied with the two requirement of good faith and fairness. Also, The American Institute(ALI) made a rule on the duty of fair dealing in the Principle of the Corporate Governance.
Therefore, In this article, I will examine thoroughly the problem related the duty of fair dealing(Namely, what is the duty of fair dealing and who are the one performed the duty etc.) and present the solving ideas when the related problem happen in our country.
By the traditional Corporate law, in such cases, the shareholders and the creditors of dominant corporation take the directors and the officers of their corporation to account for the wrongdoing or negligent act. On the contrary, the shareholders and the creditors of subordinated corporation also take the directors and the officers of their corporation to account for the such act. However, the shareholders and the creditors of subordinated corporation can not hold the responsibility for the such act on the directors and officers of the controlling corporation, not the subordinated corporation.
As gathered from the U.S. cases, if the dominant or majority stockholder exercises a controlling influence over the management or policies of the corporation or the transaction or conduct in question by virtue of the person's position as a shareholder, he must fulfill his fiduciary duty as a trustee. Furthermore, to keep such duty is satisfied with the two requirement of good faith and fairness. Also, The American Institute(ALI) made a rule on the duty of fair dealing in the Principle of the Corporate Governance.
Therefore, In this article, I will examine thoroughly the problem related the duty of fair dealing(Namely, what is the duty of fair dealing and who are the one performed the duty etc.) and present the solving ideas when the related problem happen in our country.
목차
Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. ALI의 공정거래의무
Ⅲ. 판례상 공정거래의 판단 기준
Ⅳ. 공정거래의무의 위반에 대한 책임
Ⅴ. 맺는 말
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
회사규모와 지배구조의 개편 : 2009년 개정상법을 중심으로
기업법연구
2010 .09
-
회사의 본질에 관한 담론
법과기업연구
2014 .06
-
기업범죄에 대한 형사적 제재에 관한 연구
법학연구
2004 .12
-
미국법상 S 주식회사제도에 관한 소고
기업법연구
2012 .06
-
당대 중국 회사범죄 논쟁문제의 연구
비교형사법연구
2013 .01
-
주식회사 대표이사의 권한과 책임
한양법학
2008 .02
-
주ㆍ토공 통합의 효율성 평가 : 자료포락분석을 통한 지방공기업과의 재무제표상 비교를 중심으로
도시행정학보
2009 .08
-
회사지배구조 관련 회사법제의 나아갈 방향 - 2008년 상법개정안 검토 -
경영법률
2008 .01
-
페이퍼컴퍼니와 법인제도의 남용
경영법률
2011 .01
-
관광기업의 협력형 경쟁이 경쟁전략 및 경영성과에 미치는 영향
관광레저연구
2017 .08
-
기업의 사회적 성과평가 제도 : 외국 사례를 중심으로
한국사회과학연구
2003 .12
-
종속회사의 채권자보호
기업법연구
2013 .06
-
支配會社 株主의 經營參加權: 從屬會社의 重要事項에 대한 議決權 確保方案을 中心으로
기업법연구
2004 .03
-
법인세법상 비영리법인의 수익사업에 관한 연구
법학연구
2004 .12
-
감사위원회제도의 문제점과 개선방안
재산법연구
2006 .01
-
新株의 低價發行에 관한 논의 : 삼성 에버랜드와 SDS에 대한 판결을 중심으로
기업법연구
2010 .09
-
기업범죄에 관한 연구
법학연구
2003 .06
-
주식회사의 법인격의 별개성 再論-"에버랜드 판결"에 대한 비판적 고찰을 통하여
한양법학
2009 .11
-
범죄피해자로서 법인의 본질 -모욕죄와 협박죄를 중심으로-
피해자학연구
2008 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-015296226