지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Traditionally, the family life of Koreans has been governed by the patriarchal family system for hundreds of years. Therefore, our family law enacted in 1958 is fundamentally based on paternalism. For example, the family headship by a male person and the succession to family headship is one of the most out standing features in our family law.
So, the Korean civil law was based not on the interests of the child itself but on the obedience of a child to his or her parent. And the equality of the sexes was not realized.
But the Korean family law had been greatly amended in order to solve the above two problems in 1990. Especially the revision of 1990 was not only revision but also the revolution of Korean family law in a sense. According to pass the times, the amended Civil Code of Korea in 1990 was not in keeping with the realities of one's legal life.
Therefore, the Revision Committee of Civil Law which was founded in the Ministry of Justice, was in the progress of study during several years in order to spread the principle of the best interests of the child and the equality of the sexes. The amended Cibill Code of Korea in March, 2005 is the result of that study. The main contents of the amended Civil Code is the same as the followings.
The range of family was changed. And The Full Adoption system was established newly in the Civil Code. The full adoption will be broken off the legal relations with the his biological family. And it will be established newly with the adoptive family. Also, Family-head system was repealed. Family-head system indicates the relation between hoju, the head of family and his family members. It prescribes the position in the family legally, like who will be the hoju and who will be the family members. It also makes hoju to take the central role of a family members. When one changes his social stading, he may also change which family he belongs. Consequently, the idea to abolish hoju is holding a prominent position. The only question is how to decide on the type of organizing each family or to modify the residents registration act. Before that, we need a common consent about the degree of change. We should be ready in cases of preventing marriage between relatives, confusions of changing family names frequently when amend family-head system.
It is desirable that the system which succeed to one's family property much more by one's supporting. It comes in pretty handy for a person who has not financial power for the performance of a supporting duty. And it is corresponded to the principle of equity between the successors. So, the system of the inheritance for one`s supporting was established newly.
So, the Korean civil law was based not on the interests of the child itself but on the obedience of a child to his or her parent. And the equality of the sexes was not realized.
But the Korean family law had been greatly amended in order to solve the above two problems in 1990. Especially the revision of 1990 was not only revision but also the revolution of Korean family law in a sense. According to pass the times, the amended Civil Code of Korea in 1990 was not in keeping with the realities of one's legal life.
Therefore, the Revision Committee of Civil Law which was founded in the Ministry of Justice, was in the progress of study during several years in order to spread the principle of the best interests of the child and the equality of the sexes. The amended Cibill Code of Korea in March, 2005 is the result of that study. The main contents of the amended Civil Code is the same as the followings.
The range of family was changed. And The Full Adoption system was established newly in the Civil Code. The full adoption will be broken off the legal relations with the his biological family. And it will be established newly with the adoptive family. Also, Family-head system was repealed. Family-head system indicates the relation between hoju, the head of family and his family members. It prescribes the position in the family legally, like who will be the hoju and who will be the family members. It also makes hoju to take the central role of a family members. When one changes his social stading, he may also change which family he belongs. Consequently, the idea to abolish hoju is holding a prominent position. The only question is how to decide on the type of organizing each family or to modify the residents registration act. Before that, we need a common consent about the degree of change. We should be ready in cases of preventing marriage between relatives, confusions of changing family names frequently when amend family-head system.
It is desirable that the system which succeed to one's family property much more by one's supporting. It comes in pretty handy for a person who has not financial power for the performance of a supporting duty. And it is corresponded to the principle of equity between the successors. So, the system of the inheritance for one`s supporting was established newly.
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 親族法 部門의 改正內容
Ⅲ. 相續法部門의 改正內容
Ⅳ. 結論
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문과 연관된 판례 (2)
-
헌법재판소 1998. 8. 27. 선고 96헌가22,97헌가2·3·9,96헌바81,98헌바24·25(병합) 전원재판부
가. 상속인이 귀책사유 없이 상속채무가 적극재산을 초과하는 사실을 알지 못하여 상속개시 있음을 안 날로부터 3월내에 한정승인 또는 포기를 하지 못한 경우에도 단순승인을 한 것으로 보는 민법 제1026조 제2호는 기본권제한의 입법한계를 일탈한 것으로 재산권을 보장한 헌법 제23조 제1항, 사적자치권을 보장한 헌법 제10조 제1항에 위반된다
자세히 보기 -
헌법재판소 1997. 3. 27. 선고 95헌가14,96헌가7(병합) 전원재판부〔헌법불합치〕
가. (1) 친생부인의 소에 관하여 어느 정도의 제척기간을 둘 것인가는 법률적인 친자관계를 진실에 부합시키고자 하는 부의 이익과 친자관계의 신속한 확정을 통하여 법적 안정을 찾고자 하는 자의 이익을 어떻게 그 사회의 실정과 전통적 관념에 맞게 조화시킬 것인가에 관한 문제로서 이해관계인들의 기본권적 지위와 혼인 및 가족생활에 관한 헌법적 결단
자세히 보기
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
戶主制에 관하여
비교법학연구
2005 .03
-
다양한 가족 유형의 확산에 따른 「민법」의 개선 과제 검토
가족법연구
2020 .01
-
가족복지정책이 갖는 의미에 대한 연구 : 가족 행위 규제 내용을 중심으로
보건과 복지
2006 .12
-
家族法改正의 內容과 課題 : 제12차 민법개정을 중심으로
법학연구
2005 .06
-
A Study on Family Type and Family Cycle in Korea
人口問題論集
1983 .03
-
유아기 자녀를 둔 가족의 가족의례 군집유형에 따른 가족건강성의 차이
유아교육연구
2019 .01
-
아동기 가정폭력을 경험한 내담자 가족의 갈등치유를 위한 가족상담사례연구
한국가족관계학회지
2020 .01
-
법의 한계 영역으로서의 가정(家庭)
法學論文集
2013 .01
-
몽골 유학생의 가정건강성에 관한 연구 - 여자 대학원생을 중심으로 -
몽골학
2017 .01
-
호텔 여성 근로자의 일과 가정의 균형(Work-Family Balance)에 관한 연구
관광레저연구
2013 .08
-
가족관광 촉진요인이 가족관광 참여 및 가족역동성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
관광레저연구
2014 .05
-
지역주민의 가족친화정책 인식에 관한 연구 : 충청남도를 중심으로
지역사회연구
2011 .06
-
장애아가족의 가족 탄력성증진을 위한 가족복지서비스의 개선방안
한국가족복지학
2014 .01
-
호주제도 폐지에 따른 민법규정 및 호적제도의 검토
법학연구
2006 .02
-
장기적으로 활동한 아이돌보미의 가족 레질리언스 분석: 월시(Walsh)의 관점을 중심으로
Human Ecology Research
2017 .01
-
육아기 맞벌이 남성의 일·가정 양립 경험
Human Ecology Research
2013 .01
-
외식기업 직원의 직장-가정 문화, 직장-가정 갈등, 그리고 철회행동과의 관계연구: 직장-가정 분리선호의 조절효과를 중심으로
관광경영연구
2020 .01
-
국·공립 어린이집의 가족지원 프로그램에 대한 장애 영·유아 교사와 가족의 인식 및 요구 : 경기 지역을 중심으로
특수교육논총
2014 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-015296433