지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2005.8
- 수록면
- 161 - 187 (27page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Oleanna (1992) written by David Mamet reflects dynamics of ideology and power shift which operate in discourse practices. In addition, we can identify not only Mamet’s grim perspective on American higher education but also controversial aspects of political correctness. As a social institution including the patriarchal culture, the educational institution functions as one of the fundamental social ideologies.
Seemingly, the text is likely to foreground the matter of sexual harrassment. However, Mamet reveals that the issue of sexual harassment is essentially linked with power relationship. Apart from the harassment issue, the central concern of this research is to investigate how language use can affect the formation of power and how power of language use transfers through this text.
In Oleanna, a male professor, John, possessing power, appears as a representative icon of the established ideology in comparison with the female student, Carol, representing the powerless class. The confrontation with language between professor and student illuminates the hierarchical relationship within institutions. Moreover, there is the power shift of language between male and female characters. One who has the power of language can control and suppress others’ voice.
Through the unequal relationship between professor and student, this text is concerned with conflicts between the subject and the other. It can be possible to be a subject if one may have domination over language. Also, the control of language is associated with the will to knowledge. Most importantly, Carol can accomplish the reversal of ideology of power by engaging in plays on signifiers.
In terms of Lacan’s division of signifier and signified, Carol takes advantage of the signifiers from John's rhetoric as a weapon to attack him. In particular, writing down John’s pedantic jargons, Carol tries to assimilate his values of the established ideology. Carol’s insight into particular signifiers from John can channel a route for learning the relationship between language and power. With emphasis on power shift and domination of language, the relevance of ideology??and the interpellation of subject in terms of Althusser are discussed.
In conclusion, Carol’s adherence to John’s signifiers shows the ideological shift from male-dominant discourse to discourse of marginality. With analysis on the relationship between language and power, power over language may allow one to have hegemonic priority. Therefore, the hegemony of language provides a possibility of existing as a subject. However, desire toward the hegemony of power and language has been reiterated like infinite regress of signifiers, thus producing more signifiers. Carol’s desire toward power and ideology cannot be satisfied although Carol could seize the hegemony of language over John. Therefore, desire toward power and ideology cannot set one free from the shackle of language.
Seemingly, the text is likely to foreground the matter of sexual harrassment. However, Mamet reveals that the issue of sexual harassment is essentially linked with power relationship. Apart from the harassment issue, the central concern of this research is to investigate how language use can affect the formation of power and how power of language use transfers through this text.
In Oleanna, a male professor, John, possessing power, appears as a representative icon of the established ideology in comparison with the female student, Carol, representing the powerless class. The confrontation with language between professor and student illuminates the hierarchical relationship within institutions. Moreover, there is the power shift of language between male and female characters. One who has the power of language can control and suppress others’ voice.
Through the unequal relationship between professor and student, this text is concerned with conflicts between the subject and the other. It can be possible to be a subject if one may have domination over language. Also, the control of language is associated with the will to knowledge. Most importantly, Carol can accomplish the reversal of ideology of power by engaging in plays on signifiers.
In terms of Lacan’s division of signifier and signified, Carol takes advantage of the signifiers from John's rhetoric as a weapon to attack him. In particular, writing down John’s pedantic jargons, Carol tries to assimilate his values of the established ideology. Carol’s insight into particular signifiers from John can channel a route for learning the relationship between language and power. With emphasis on power shift and domination of language, the relevance of ideology??and the interpellation of subject in terms of Althusser are discussed.
In conclusion, Carol’s adherence to John’s signifiers shows the ideological shift from male-dominant discourse to discourse of marginality. With analysis on the relationship between language and power, power over language may allow one to have hegemonic priority. Therefore, the hegemony of language provides a possibility of existing as a subject. However, desire toward the hegemony of power and language has been reiterated like infinite regress of signifiers, thus producing more signifiers. Carol’s desire toward power and ideology cannot be satisfied although Carol could seize the hegemony of language over John. Therefore, desire toward power and ideology cannot set one free from the shackle of language.
목차
１, 언어게임
２. 주체와 타자의 전도
３. 결론
인용문헌
Astract
참고문헌 (8)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Bigsby / 1985 / A Critical Introduction to the Twentieth-Century American Drama
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Evans,Dylan / 1996 / An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Foster / 1995 / and Pedagogy in Mamet's Oleanna and Ionesco's The Lesson : 36 ~ 50
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Pascale / 1992 / The Teacher-Student Relationship in the Plays of David Mamet : 69 ~ 86
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Jacques / 1977 / The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Evans,Dylan / 1996 / An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Foster / 1995 / and Pedagogy in Mamet's Oleanna and Ionesco's The Lesson : 36 ~ 50
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Pascale / 1992 / The Teacher-Student Relationship in the Plays of David Mamet : 69 ~ 86
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Jacques / 1977 / The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
올리아나: 정치적 올바름의 이면에 관한 고찰
영어영문학연구
2007 .01
-
새롭게 열망하는 유토피아: 데이비드 매밋의 『올리아나』읽기
동서비교문학저널
2020 .06
-
권력과 언어의 공모: 데이빗 매밋의 『올리나』 읽기
영어영문학연구
2018 .01
-
The Power Struggle in Oleanna
신영어영문학
2005 .11
-
말을 두고 말해본다
중국조선어문
2017 .03
-
데이비드 매밋의 Oleanna에서 교육과 지적 평등
현대영미드라마
2016 .12
-
광고 언어의 연구는 언어의 힘에 대한 연구이다
한국어학
2016 .11
-
Christmas Carol
Korea Journal
1966 .07
-
Language Ideologies in the Early English Education Policy in Korea: A Sociohistorical Perspective
영어영문학
2020 .02
-
The Making of the Korean Language
Korea Journal
1974 .08
-
부재의 재현 : 이미지를 통한 언어의 한계성 극복
19세기 영어권 문학
2007 .08
-
What Power
Korea Journal
1972 .12
-
언어와 비어(非語)
동서인문학
2008 .12
-
Language Context and Language Experience : Adult Language Learners' Self-Concepts in Second Language Academic Context
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2007 .05
-
이중어 글쓰기 세대의 한국어 시쓰기 문제 : 1950, 60년대 김종삼의 경우
한국시학연구
2007 .04
-
English Ideology and the Audience of Performance
영어영문학
2019 .05
-
국어교육에서의 언어정체성과 문법 교육의 역할
국어교육연구
2016 .06
-
The Effects of Language Difference on L2 Learners’ Language Performance
미래영어영문학회 학술대회 자료집
2017 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-842-015464687