지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2003.8
- 수록면
- 247 - 267 (21page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
One of the characteristic trends in recent American drama is its association in the increasing growth of scientific materials that serve important functions in depicting not only the advanced knowledge of science but the riddles of life. Such materials are too often described in metaphorical terms, foregrounding the nature of indeterminacy, undecidability, and uncertainty reflected in our daily life. Thus, this paper examines how mathematical proofs in David Auburn's Proof serve as a metaphor for the uncertainty of life, by focusing on the indeterminable process of proving the issues of authorship, of madness, of self, and of the relationship between characters.
Proof is generally considered to imply the absoluteness for an unchanging that is an absolute truth of reality. Yet this kind of proof is not suited for solving perplexing problems mainly related with a breakthrough mathematical proof of prime numbers in Proof: Who created this proof?; Did Robert retreat into schizophrenic dementia?; Will Catherine inherit her father's mental instability?; Do Catherine and Hall trust and love each other?; and Will Claire take her back to New York? The uncertainty of proving these problems suggests a framework for demonstrating how difficult it is to derive theorems of life. As our daily life which is filled with undecidable theorems that cannot be proved by the axioms, proof functions not as an absolute mathematical concept but a relative one that allows us to grasp the uncertainty of life.
Armed with their own beliefs, however, the characters attempt to search for the absolute truth behind a mysterious mathematical proof. Despite their attempts, they cannot reach the axiomatic conclusion on such perplexing problems; their beliefs, therefore, reveal themselves as repetitions of the abstract and undecidable theorem. With its subtle use of mathematics, this play retains qualities typical of undecidable phenomena of life with its frames that remain open-ended and inconclusive.
Proof is generally considered to imply the absoluteness for an unchanging that is an absolute truth of reality. Yet this kind of proof is not suited for solving perplexing problems mainly related with a breakthrough mathematical proof of prime numbers in Proof: Who created this proof?; Did Robert retreat into schizophrenic dementia?; Will Catherine inherit her father's mental instability?; Do Catherine and Hall trust and love each other?; and Will Claire take her back to New York? The uncertainty of proving these problems suggests a framework for demonstrating how difficult it is to derive theorems of life. As our daily life which is filled with undecidable theorems that cannot be proved by the axioms, proof functions not as an absolute mathematical concept but a relative one that allows us to grasp the uncertainty of life.
Armed with their own beliefs, however, the characters attempt to search for the absolute truth behind a mysterious mathematical proof. Despite their attempts, they cannot reach the axiomatic conclusion on such perplexing problems; their beliefs, therefore, reveal themselves as repetitions of the abstract and undecidable theorem. With its subtle use of mathematics, this play retains qualities typical of undecidable phenomena of life with its frames that remain open-ended and inconclusive.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 수학의 낭만적 특성과 추상적 공리의 한계
Ⅲ. 삶의 불확정성과 증명불가능성
Ⅳ. 수학의 모순성과 자아와 신뢰의 불확실성
Ⅴ. 절대적 증명과 성차에의 도전
Ⅵ. 나가며
주
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
증명론적 타당성의 사소성 문제
논리연구
2015 .01
-
창의적 · 비판적 사고력 신장을 위한 수학적 증명 학습-지도 방안
성곡논총
2004 .09
-
역리와 증명
철학
1996 .06
-
데카르트 『성찰』의 신 존재 증명과 새로운 관념이론 : "선험성"과 "후험성"의 의미에 대한 재고
철학연구
2014 .03
-
『메논』편에서의 ‘옳은 믿음’과 ‘앎’ : 수학적 논증의 예를 중심으로
서양고전학연구
2002 .12
-
Premise and Validity of Proofs for the Existence of God in the Middle Ages
Catholic Theology and Thought
2019 .07
-
헤겔의 신 존재 논증
신학과세계
2003 .09
-
증명론적 의미론과 원자적 기반
철학
2015 .11
-
수학적 증명의 조망가능성 : 비트겐슈타인의 수학철학을 중심으로
철학탐구
2005 .05
-
선험적 연역의 구조
철학
1989 .06
-
데카르트 신 존재증명의 의의
철학연구
2017 .02
-
실증과 사유: 텍스트 읽기와 이해 - 박희병,『능호관 이인상 서화평석 1: 회화』,『능호관 이인상 서화평석 2: 서예』(돌베개, 2018)
한국민족문화
2019 .08
-
Life
Korea Journal
1972 .08
-
쿠르트 괴델의 수학적 신학 : 불완전성 정리, 무한, 하나님에 관한 존재론적 증명
한국기독교신학논총
2007 .01
-
인생의 개념적 은유를 통해 본 영어와 한국어에서의 은유변이
새한영어영문학
2009 .11
-
A Study on the Proofs of God`s Existence in Thomas Aquinas
한국기독교신학논총
2009 .12
-
상반관계와 불교의 찰나설
불교학보
2000 .12
-
수학적 증명에 있어서 계산과 실험의 구분 : 비트겐슈타인의 LFM과 RFM을 중심으로
철학탐구
2014 .11
-
Proofs of God against Kant
Catholic Theology and Thought
2019 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-842-015465033