지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In Japan, we have managed to socio-economic development, socio-economic equality and political stability at the same time, and also the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) have established one party dominant party system, particularly through the period of 1960s, 1970s and 1980s. Conventionally, as socio-economic development is firstly pursued, socio-economic inequality, especially inequality of income distribution is expanded, economic strikes and political demonstrations may be caused, and as a result political instability may be brought about. In the same way as just like in the case of other developing countries, in that of Malaysia, because the country have had priority over socio-economic development, the inequality had resulted particularly through the period of 1960s and 1970s. But in the case of Malaysia different from those of Japan and the other developing countries, in spite of its socio-economic iiequality, it has enjoyed political stability since 1970s. It seems that this is due to the characteristics of its party system rather than some socio-economic policies by Malaysian government.
Thereby, this article tries to consider to what degree the characteristics of Malaysia’s party system, in other word, the “hegemonic party” has increased its inclusiveness in regard to external relations―the second aspect of inclusiveness ―and its stability. Therefore the analysis is conducted along three dimensions of relations: namely, the relations among ruling parties, among opposition parties, and between ruling and opposition parties. It appears that based on these analysises the original model of Malaysia’s political development is able to be described as we previously pointed out.
Thereby, this article tries to consider to what degree the characteristics of Malaysia’s party system, in other word, the “hegemonic party” has increased its inclusiveness in regard to external relations―the second aspect of inclusiveness ―and its stability. Therefore the analysis is conducted along three dimensions of relations: namely, the relations among ruling parties, among opposition parties, and between ruling and opposition parties. It appears that based on these analysises the original model of Malaysia’s political development is able to be described as we previously pointed out.
목차
はじめに
??間?係
野?間?係
??と野?の?係
おわりに
?考文?
논문초록
저자소개
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Role of Political Parties
Korea Journal
1963 .09
-
The Party
Korea Journal
1983 .10
-
21세기 한국, 20세기와의 결별 가능성 : 10·26 선거 및 정치질서 변동을 보는 한 가지 시선
역사비평
2011 .11
-
유럽 극우정당의 현황과 득표율 연구
민족연구
2009 .01
-
Political Parties and Diplomatic Policy
Korea Journal
1967 .06
-
러시아의 “권력당”과 한국의 집권여당 비교연구 : 강력한 대통령제 아래에서 친정부 정당의 조직과 행동패턴
슬라브학보
2007 .06
-
Political Parties and Party Politics in Korea
Korea Journal
1967 .06
-
러시아정당 이념형성의 신제도주의적 분석 : 공산당, 야블로코와 통일러시아를 사례로 하여
슬라브학보
2007 .06
-
1950년대 후반 자유당 개헌 논의의 내용과 성격
역사와현실
2011 .06
-
한국의 정치사회적 갈등 연구
한국학연구
2002 .11
-
Korean Political Parties and Political Development : Crucial Elections and the Process of Institutionalization of the Political Party System
Korea Journal
1978 .01
-
경제적 불평등과 정치사회적 갈등
한국학연구
1999 .12
-
정치은유와 프레임형성 : ‘한국사 교과서 국정화’ 정치 담화를 중심으로
담화와인지
2017 .02
-
Development of Parties and Politics in Korea (Ⅱ)
Korea Journal
1974 .10
-
Development of Parties and Politics in Korea (Ⅰ)
Korea Journal
1974 .09
-
Development of Party Politics in Korea
Korea Journal
1968 .12
-
파티플래닝(Party Planning)의 속성에 대한 탐색적 분석과 고객들의 인지도 비교
한국식생활문화학회지
2004 .01
-
일본의 초기(1880년대) 정당발전
동아문화
1979 .06
-
Party Politics in Korea
Korea Journal
1966 .02
-
Political Parties and Factionalism
Korea Journal
1967 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-913-017445857