지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The main purpose of this paper is to provide reform measures on the basis of an evaluation of the problems and efficacy of green belts system(GBS) in Korea in an application of evaluation elements, derived from four evaluation criteria for urban development guidance system and related six growth management factors.
As for efficacy of Korean GBS, we found that 1) the GBS does not organized with goals of urban growth management system and general plan and large amounts land in green belts have been converted for various public uses by public agencies, 2) designation of green belts area had been against police power regulations, eventually causing inefficient land uses, 3) taking issues through exercise of police power and eminent domain are the most critical concerns raised by landowner, and 4) the GBS does not equipped with such necessary regulation as floor area ratio(FAR), minimum lot area(MLA) and yard size for land development.
As for reform measures of Korean GBS, we suggest that 1) after determining the nature of Korean GBS, the GBS as a tool of urban growth management must be consistent with goals of urban growth management and general plan of the cities, 2) along with sufficient compensation on excess land use regulations and land acquisition through an exercise of eminent domain by public bodies, the GBS must prepare such criterion as FAR, MLA and yard size for land development, permitting system based on positive regulations on land use activities, and standards for public uses of green belts area, 3) the GBS is required such device as subzoning, planned unit development, transfer of development right, purchase of development rights and regional capital improvement programming for remedial purposes of problems caused by green belts, and tax incremental financing, preferential taxation, impact fees, beneficiary fees and fees on conversion of open space for funding green belts area.
The evaluating elements and approach, developed for this study, are turned out to be highly useful and to be applicable to evaluation of efficacy of other urban development tools.
As for efficacy of Korean GBS, we found that 1) the GBS does not organized with goals of urban growth management system and general plan and large amounts land in green belts have been converted for various public uses by public agencies, 2) designation of green belts area had been against police power regulations, eventually causing inefficient land uses, 3) taking issues through exercise of police power and eminent domain are the most critical concerns raised by landowner, and 4) the GBS does not equipped with such necessary regulation as floor area ratio(FAR), minimum lot area(MLA) and yard size for land development.
As for reform measures of Korean GBS, we suggest that 1) after determining the nature of Korean GBS, the GBS as a tool of urban growth management must be consistent with goals of urban growth management and general plan of the cities, 2) along with sufficient compensation on excess land use regulations and land acquisition through an exercise of eminent domain by public bodies, the GBS must prepare such criterion as FAR, MLA and yard size for land development, permitting system based on positive regulations on land use activities, and standards for public uses of green belts area, 3) the GBS is required such device as subzoning, planned unit development, transfer of development right, purchase of development rights and regional capital improvement programming for remedial purposes of problems caused by green belts, and tax incremental financing, preferential taxation, impact fees, beneficiary fees and fees on conversion of open space for funding green belts area.
The evaluating elements and approach, developed for this study, are turned out to be highly useful and to be applicable to evaluation of efficacy of other urban development tools.
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 도시 성장관리와 개발제한구역제도
Ⅲ. 우리 나라 개발제한구역 제도의 실효성 평가
Ⅳ. 우리 나라 개발제한구역 제도의 개선 대책
Ⅴ. 결론
參考文獻
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
도시개발 시뮬레이션 모형을 이용한 수도권 개발제한구역의 시가지확산 억제효과 평가
국토계획
2008 .02
-
100Gb/s ( 10Gb/s×10채널 ) 신호의 단일모드 광섬유 전송 ( Transmission of 100Gb/s ( 10Gb/s x 10channels ) signals using Single Mode Fiber )
대한전자공학회 기타 간행물
1997 .01
-
100Gb/s ( 10Gb/s x 10채널 ) 신호의 단일모드 광섬유 전송 ( Transmission of 100Gb/s ( 10Gb/s x 10channels ) signals using single mode fiber )
한국통신학회 기타 간행물
1997 .01
-
10 Gb/s 광전송 시스템 설계
대한전자공학회 학술대회
1996 .11
-
10 Gb/s 광전송 시스템 설계 ( Design of a 10Gb/s Optical Transmission System )
대한전자공학회 학술대회
1996 .11
-
100Gb/s ( 10Gb/s × 10채널 ) 신호의 180km 분산천이 광섬유 전송실험 ( Transmission of 100Gb/s ( 10Gb/s × 10channels ) Signals over 180km of Dispersion-Shifted Fiber )
한국통신학회 광전자공학 학술회의
1997 .01
-
100Gb/s 광다중 기술
한국통신학회 워크샵
1995 .01
-
Metropolitan growth management and green belt in Korea
환경논총
2001 .12
-
그린벨트設定에 따른 內ㆍ外部 土地利用動向의 實態分析에 關한 硏究
국토계획
2000 .04
-
Development of 10Gb/s Optical Transmission System
대한전자공학회 세미나
1998 .01
-
10Gb/s 광모듈 개발
한국통신학회 워크샵
1995 .01
-
100Gb/s ( 10Gb/s ×10 채널 ) 신호의 180㎞ 분산천이 광섬유 전송실험 ( Transmission 100Gb/s × 10channels Signals Over 180Km of Dispersion - Shifted Fiber )
대한전자공학회 학술대회
1997 .01
-
10Gb/s 광전송시스템 개발
한국통신학회 워크샵
1995 .01
-
10Gb/s 광전송 시스템 개발
한국통신학회 워크샵
1996 .01
-
100Gb/s 광전송 시스템 개발
한국통신학회 워크샵
1996 .01
-
Optical Communication System at 40 Gb/s and Beyond
OPTOELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE
1997 .01
-
10Gb/s 4 채널 수용 40Gb/s TDM 트랜스폰더 제작
한국통신학회 기타 간행물
2004 .11
-
10Gb/s 광링크 개발
한국통신학회 워크샵
1995 .01
-
40Gb/s 광 전송을 위한 전기적 신호처리 방법
한국통신학회 학술대회논문집
2005 .06
-
수도권 개발제한구역 조정기준에 관한 연구
국토계획
2001 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
서울시 개발제한구역의 도시관리실태 평가 및 개선방향 : 도시개발 현황 및 문제점
김선웅
,
권영덕
,
변유진
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2010
.12
개발제한구역 조정의 영향요인에 관한 연구
손상락
,
이백호
,
최열
서울도시연구
2005
.03
개발제한구역 제도개선 법제화방안
이외희
,
봉인식
,
이지은
정책연구
2008
.03
개발제한구역 해제가 토지이용변화에 미치는 영향 : : 남양주시 사례를 중심으로
박상규
,
김창석
국토연구
2009
.06
지역 및 도시개발의 문제와 대책 : 그린벨트 관리제도의 문제점과 개선방향 ( Problems and Prospects of Greenbelt Menagement System in Korea )
최병선
건축
1993
.07
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-539-017493546