지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the most of the urbanized world, it is pursued to solve global problems that is mainly caused by the explosion of population increase. Nevertheless the regional disparity hinders this pursuit, for the problems of regional disparity cannot be settled without solving the problems of a certain lagging region.
So the development of the lagging region of the respective countries is considered as the most important matter to advance a balanced development of the whole country.
In our country, one of the developing countries, the government announced the urban policy of centralized urbanization upon five metropolitan centers (Deajon, Chonju, Kwangju, Deagu and Masan) as growth pole center to control the hyperurbanization of the primate city of Seoul and reduce the regional disparity by transplanting the various functions of Seoul to these cities.
The underlying idea of the government was that national happiness and advancement of quality of life would flow from the relentless pursuit of economic growth which would most readily result from rapid industrialization ; that rapid industrialization be accomodated most efficiently in a few metropolitan centers from which its extended effect would spread over to the rest of the region.
There is, however, two constraints against this development strategy. On the one hand, the regional disparity between rural and urban could not be reduced under the dualistic structure of the primate city concentration and the rest of the nation, which have been formed traditionally, thus the development of growth pole city is apt to bring about another hyperurbanization. Secondly the international economy which has permitted temporarily high economic growth is in the midst of a major transition into the tendency of restricting expansion of export market.
Therefore it is proposed that the hinterland of growth center, that is, rural region has to be developed at the same time as the development of growth pole cities and it is necessary to input the manufacturing industry into rural region as well as develop the primary industry which is inherent one in rural region.
From these contexts, I propose the five growth pole city would be better to take development role as the following;
The growth pole city could be developed as mother city through sharing the population and function of Seoul in the way of promoting its own functins instead of uniform bestowal of the function of the manufacturing industry. Industrial park could be distributed to the nearer nodal points to the central city, and these nodal points as satellite towns could be developed on the growing axis of the region. And in order to control the disordered expansion, sprawl, of the mother city, agropolitan districts are constructed around the perimeter of the city by the methodology of agropolitan approach.
With this pattern the agglomeration of cities would play efficiently the role of growth pole and would be led naturally to the phenomenon of concentration which is already foreseen in Korea, in the region with the highest density of population and urban function.
So the development of the lagging region of the respective countries is considered as the most important matter to advance a balanced development of the whole country.
In our country, one of the developing countries, the government announced the urban policy of centralized urbanization upon five metropolitan centers (Deajon, Chonju, Kwangju, Deagu and Masan) as growth pole center to control the hyperurbanization of the primate city of Seoul and reduce the regional disparity by transplanting the various functions of Seoul to these cities.
The underlying idea of the government was that national happiness and advancement of quality of life would flow from the relentless pursuit of economic growth which would most readily result from rapid industrialization ; that rapid industrialization be accomodated most efficiently in a few metropolitan centers from which its extended effect would spread over to the rest of the region.
There is, however, two constraints against this development strategy. On the one hand, the regional disparity between rural and urban could not be reduced under the dualistic structure of the primate city concentration and the rest of the nation, which have been formed traditionally, thus the development of growth pole city is apt to bring about another hyperurbanization. Secondly the international economy which has permitted temporarily high economic growth is in the midst of a major transition into the tendency of restricting expansion of export market.
Therefore it is proposed that the hinterland of growth center, that is, rural region has to be developed at the same time as the development of growth pole cities and it is necessary to input the manufacturing industry into rural region as well as develop the primary industry which is inherent one in rural region.
From these contexts, I propose the five growth pole city would be better to take development role as the following;
The growth pole city could be developed as mother city through sharing the population and function of Seoul in the way of promoting its own functins instead of uniform bestowal of the function of the manufacturing industry. Industrial park could be distributed to the nearer nodal points to the central city, and these nodal points as satellite towns could be developed on the growing axis of the region. And in order to control the disordered expansion, sprawl, of the mother city, agropolitan districts are constructed around the perimeter of the city by the methodology of agropolitan approach.
With this pattern the agglomeration of cities would play efficiently the role of growth pole and would be led naturally to the phenomenon of concentration which is already foreseen in Korea, in the region with the highest density of population and urban function.
목차
ABSTRACT
1. 序論
2. 分析
3. 比較 ; 外國例
4. 對策
參考文獻
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
세종시(행정중심복합도시) 계획, 무엇을 담고 있는가?
건축
2015 .02
-
기능적 연계성 분석을 통한 수도권내 도시연결체계의 변화와 특징에 관한 연구
국토계획
2007 .10
-
한국도시의 형태변화 모델
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2014 .10
-
地域均衡發展을 위한 中小都市의 空間的 機能과 役割에 관한 硏究
국토계획
1995 .06
-
한국의 자족도시 정의와 관련 개발 정책에 대한 분석 : 시스템다이내믹스를 이용하여
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2011 .07
-
우리나라 중소도시 특성과 네트워크도시 형성
국토계획
2013 .04
-
[“U-City" 특집을 내면서]
정보과학회지
2005 .11
-
연계성에 따른 지방 광역도시권의 설정과 발전 방향
국토계획
2012 .02
-
U-City 시스템 개발에 필요한 실시설계 절차 연구
대한토목학회 간행물
2008 .12
-
韓國都市의 連結體系 : 電話通貨量을 指標로
국토계획
1988 .07
-
서울의 도시이미지 평가를 통한 도시만족도 분석
국토계획
2013 .11
-
서비스 지향적 u-City 구성체계
대한토목학회 간행물
2008 .12
-
大都市의 立地와 形態에 関한 研究 : 大邱市 事例研究
국토계획
1982 .12
-
航空寫眞에 의한 韓國都市의 市街地 變遷過程 比較硏究
국토계획
1990 .07
-
도농통합형 행정구역 개편이 도시성장에 미치는 영향 분석
국토계획
2017 .02
-
Growth poles Strategy for Korean New Town
국토계획
1975 .12
-
우리나라 도시의 인구성쇠패턴에 관한 연구
국토계획
2002 .02
-
U-City정보의 생산ㆍ수집ㆍ가공ㆍ활용 및 유통 등 정보관리방안 수립 연구
대한공간정보학회지
2009 .06
-
u-City서비스·기술·기반시설의 연계성 확보방안
한국GIS학회지
2009 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-539-017508588