지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
1) The urban governments in developing countries have been in increased administrative demands and, to that extent, the citizens are in need of citizen participation for the deciding of urban problems.
2) Perhaps no other innovation in public administration currently is receiving more attention than the idea that citizens themselves ought to have a greater role in shaping the decisions made by public agencies. Citizen participation, not just at election time but on a continuing basis, is, of course, not a new idea at all but is to be associated with ancient concepts of democracy. Therefore, citizen participation has become a vogue word in recent year, both in discussions of planning and in academic public administration theory.
3) In the present study citizen participation will be treated both as good in itself and as a possible means of improving public services. We will discuss the theory behind citizen participation, some of it’s contemporary forms analyze motivations for implementing citizen participation programs, indicate possible charactristics of effective citizen participation and note some advantages of participation.
4) The advantages we can expect from citizen participation include : restoration of human identity ; improvement of citizen’s public mind ; an individual’s expansion of social and political orientation ; strengthening of selfguiding capabilities through the enabling of citizen society ; reinforcement of responsibility and public sense and legitimacy of public administration ; and exact grasping of administrative demands. On the other hand, disadvantages should also be noted : citizen manipulation by way of power ; protection of particular profits of minority; enervation of public administration ; and possible unstable￢ness of society due to excessive citizen participation.
5) Any genuine attempt to increase all the major participation variables (numbers, average time spent, the sum of effect induced on decisions by the public) raise some enormous problems. These can be summarised as follows : the theoretical weakness of the case for increasing participation : the existing complexity of the planning process ; the inherent lack of information.
2) Perhaps no other innovation in public administration currently is receiving more attention than the idea that citizens themselves ought to have a greater role in shaping the decisions made by public agencies. Citizen participation, not just at election time but on a continuing basis, is, of course, not a new idea at all but is to be associated with ancient concepts of democracy. Therefore, citizen participation has become a vogue word in recent year, both in discussions of planning and in academic public administration theory.
3) In the present study citizen participation will be treated both as good in itself and as a possible means of improving public services. We will discuss the theory behind citizen participation, some of it’s contemporary forms analyze motivations for implementing citizen participation programs, indicate possible charactristics of effective citizen participation and note some advantages of participation.
4) The advantages we can expect from citizen participation include : restoration of human identity ; improvement of citizen’s public mind ; an individual’s expansion of social and political orientation ; strengthening of selfguiding capabilities through the enabling of citizen society ; reinforcement of responsibility and public sense and legitimacy of public administration ; and exact grasping of administrative demands. On the other hand, disadvantages should also be noted : citizen manipulation by way of power ; protection of particular profits of minority; enervation of public administration ; and possible unstable￢ness of society due to excessive citizen participation.
5) Any genuine attempt to increase all the major participation variables (numbers, average time spent, the sum of effect induced on decisions by the public) raise some enormous problems. These can be summarised as follows : the theoretical weakness of the case for increasing participation : the existing complexity of the planning process ; the inherent lack of information.
목차
(ABSTRACT)
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 住民參與의 擡頭
Ⅲ. 住民參與의 認識과 效果
Ⅳ. 結論(問題點과 方向)
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
도시재생을 위한 주민참여형 설계도구 개발에 관한 기초 연구
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집 - 계획계
2008 .10
-
지방자치제에서 도시계획의 운용에 관한 연구 : 독일의 시민참여와 우리나라에서의 시사점
국토계획
1995 .12
-
環境行政과 市民參與 : 美國의 패턴을 中心으로
국토계획
1980 .09
-
주민참여 마을만들기 과정에서 전문가는 무엇을 해야 할까?
건축
2015 .05
-
住民參與에 대한 住民과 公務員의 態度 : 都市規模 및 社會的 特性과 態度와의 관계
국토계획
1986 .05
-
도시재생을 위한 다양한 주민참여 방안
건축
2011 .10
-
Long Tail Phenomenon in Public Policy : Analyzing Big Data on Citizen Participation in Smart City
대한산업공학회 춘계공동학술대회 논문집
2018 .04
-
마을만들기 주민참여 모형 개발
국토계획
2017 .10
-
근거이론 연구방법을 통한 주민들의 참여인식 및 행태변화 분석 - 장위동 도시재생사업 참여주민을 대상으로 -
국토계획
2019 .12
-
기반시설 설치에 대한 주민참여 방안 연구
국토계획
2010 .02
-
서울 숲 공원관리참여 활성화를 위한 관리주체와 공원이용객 인식 연구
국토계획
2009 .02
-
철도운영회사의 모니터 제도 운영 현황 및 개선 방향
한국철도학회 학술발표대회논문집
2008 .11
-
마을 만들기의 주민참여 수법에 관한 연구 : 어린이 참여 디자인을 중심으로
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2009 .04
-
Citizen-driven public service improvement using process mining
대한산업공학회 추계학술대회 논문집
2016 .11
-
에너지자립마을을 위한 주민참여 활성화 방안 연구
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2016 .10
-
사례분석을 통한 시정참여형 도시계획홍보관 프로그램 구상연구
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2009 .07
-
도시계획 비전수립에 있어 시민참여 과정 및 결과에 관한 시사점 고찰
국토계획
2017 .02
-
지구단위계획에서 주민참여에 관한 연구 ( A Study on the Citizen Participation in District Unit Planning )
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2002 .09
-
[용어와 건축] ‘사람 중심의 ~’에서 ‘시민 참여의 ~’로
건축
2017 .12
-
주민참여에 의한 도시주거지정비방안에 관한 연구 - 일본사례를 중심으로 -
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2005 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-539-017508720