지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the Joseon dynasty, the right to possess private Nobi workers was protected by the law, and there was no limit to the number of Nobi workers that one could possess. As a result, the ruling class invested many efforts into securing as many Nobi workers as possible, and this kind of endeavor led to certain inevitable conflicts among themselves over the issue of gaining new Nobi workers, and also a social problem in which ordinary civilians were being forcibly turned into Nobi workers. Such social problems had been criticised and addressed since the ending days of the Goryeo dynasty, and during the reign of King Taejong of the Joseon dynasty, legislation to limit the number of Nobi workers one could possess was aggressively sought for. The nature of such efforts, and the meanings of them, are as elaborated below.
First, the government intended to limit the Nobi worker possession of all classes, including members of the royal family and the sons-in-law of the Kings. This clearly showed the intentions of the government, and the nature of the Joseon dynasty.
Second, the objective of the Limitation Law(定限法) was to limit the number of private Nobi workers one could possess, and therefore prevent excessive increase in the number of Nobi workers, prevent certain powerful figures' assimilation of them, and prevent the concerned decrease in number of ordinary civilians. But the number of Nobi workers allowed to be possessed was determined strictly by respecting existing order of social classes and hierarchy.
Third, Ha-Wiji maintained a critical position toward the Limitation law designed to regulate private Nobi worker possession. Such criticism was mirroring the general position of the ruling class. It was fairly negative, and the powerful houses in the capital area which possessed many Nobi workers were especially resistant to the Law. In the end, the general consensus of this particular class did not allow the Limitation law regulating private Nobi worker possession to be legislated.
The Limitation law regulating private Nobi worker possession was promoted under the government's intention to establish a guideline, and to reinforce the authority and stability of the dynasty. The government also wanted to reinforce the social hierarchy by determining the allowed number in Nobi worker possession according to the existing social order. Unfortunately, the government was not powerful enough to force a legislation.
First, the government intended to limit the Nobi worker possession of all classes, including members of the royal family and the sons-in-law of the Kings. This clearly showed the intentions of the government, and the nature of the Joseon dynasty.
Second, the objective of the Limitation Law(定限法) was to limit the number of private Nobi workers one could possess, and therefore prevent excessive increase in the number of Nobi workers, prevent certain powerful figures' assimilation of them, and prevent the concerned decrease in number of ordinary civilians. But the number of Nobi workers allowed to be possessed was determined strictly by respecting existing order of social classes and hierarchy.
Third, Ha-Wiji maintained a critical position toward the Limitation law designed to regulate private Nobi worker possession. Such criticism was mirroring the general position of the ruling class. It was fairly negative, and the powerful houses in the capital area which possessed many Nobi workers were especially resistant to the Law. In the end, the general consensus of this particular class did not allow the Limitation law regulating private Nobi worker possession to be legislated.
The Limitation law regulating private Nobi worker possession was promoted under the government's intention to establish a guideline, and to reinforce the authority and stability of the dynasty. The government also wanted to reinforce the social hierarchy by determining the allowed number in Nobi worker possession according to the existing social order. Unfortunately, the government was not powerful enough to force a legislation.
목차
머리말
1. 정한법 1차 논의의 내용과 성격
2. 정한법 2차 논의의 내용과 성격
3. 하위지의 노비정한론 대책(對策)
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선후기 奴婢賣買 자료를 통해 본 奴婢의 사회ㆍ경제적 성격과 奴婢價의 변동
한국민족문화
2008 .04
-
16, 17세기 노양처병산법(奴良妻幷産法)과 노비소송
역사와현실
2008 .03
-
고전서사에 형상화된 노비의 존재성 탐구
돈암어문학
2017 .06
-
대명률과 조선 중기 형률상의 신분 차별
역사와현실
2007 .09
-
고려 후기 전민변정과 조선 초기 노비 정책의 의의와 한계
역사비평
2018 .02
-
호적대장을 통해 본 조선후기 노비층의 증감현상― 대구부 동상면을 중심으로
대동문화연구
2015 .01
-
반계 유형원의 奴婢論
한국인물사연구
2013 .03
-
17世紀에 있어서의 奴婢從良
한국사연구
1969 .04
-
朝鮮後期 奴婢의 土地所有 : 「記上田畓」을 중심으로
한국사연구
1990 .12
-
속량(贖良) 문서를 통해 본 17세기 조선 정부의 사노비(私奴婢) 통제 양상의 변화
역사와현실
2013 .03
-
일본 전후문학의 한국어번역과 전쟁책임 : 오오카 쇼헤이(大岡昇平)의『들불(野火)』을 중심으로
아시아문화연구
2007 .05
-
조선초기의 各司奴婢와 그 經濟的 처지
한국사연구
1996 .03
-
[총론] 고문서를 통해 볼 수 있는 것들 : 해남윤씨가 문서와 노비, 사대부, 친족 결속
역사와현실
2013 .03
-
15세기 정소(呈訴) 절차와 관찰사의 역할
역사와현실
2006 .03
-
일본의 동원형 노동자 경영참여
日本學硏究
2006 .01
-
Changes in Attitude toward Work and Workers` Identity in Korea
Korea Journal
2005 .09
-
1920년대 모스크바 노동자가족의 의식주 생활
러시아어문학연구논집
2008 .01
-
‘민주화’의 역설과 노동시의 새로운 양상 - 민주화 이후 시대의 노동시와 한국 민주주의 -
민족문화연구
2013 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-017609215