메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제16권 제1호
발행연도
2007.2
수록면
285 - 295 (11page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this research is to study the consumers' satisfaction on fitness centers operated by foreign operators and general fitness centers located in Korea. It will compare the fitness centers according to their general characteristics and find if they have differences in satisfaction. It will suggest the marketing strategy for efficient operation of the fitness centers.
To achieve the goal of this study, it had 6 physical factors such as sex, age, major, instruction experience and satisfaction degree according to their academic background. Then it studied satisfaction degree of facilities, program, cost, services, event and the other factors. It used Spss12.0 program It performed t-test and one-way ANOVA It used Scheffe method for later verification. The results are as follows.
1) Fitness centers operated by foreign operators
First, women showed higher program and event satisfaction degree than men.
Second, groups of aged less than 20 showed higher satisfaction degree of others than the other groups.
Third, groups of academic background of more than graduate schools showed low service satisfaction degree than the other groups.
Fourth, groups who have exercised between 7-12 months showed higher facilities satisfaction than the other groups.
2) General fitness center
First, women showed higher facilities satisfaction degree than men.
Second, people aged between 31-40 and people aged more than 41 showed higher service satisfaction degree than the other groups.
Third, groups with academic background of college and university graduates showed higher program satisfaction degree than the other groups.
Fourth, groups who have exercised more than 25 months showed lower cost satisfaction degree than the other groups.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과 및 논의
Ⅳ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-692-016623648