개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The global financial market is running into a dead heat, a boundary-less competition field, with the development of information communication technologies, financial liberalization, and financial integration. The government had finalized and announced the new administration's economic operation policy at the Economic Policy Control Conference held in March 2003, considering the need to revise the regulations and restrictions on the then-current institutions and products, to reinforce the competitive edge in the global financial market; the government announced their plan to legislate the Integrated Financial Act, the basic strategy of which is to integrate the various financial laws, under the aim of establishing a legal environment that suits the era of integrative financial market and converting the involvement policy based restriction system in the past into a market friendly system. Also, the administration decided to prioritize the integration of Capital Market related laws, which have the biggest need to and effect on integration after long discussions, and announced the legislation of Bill on the Legislation of Laws Regarding the Capital Market and Financial Investment Service Act in June, 2006. The goal of legislating the Capital Market and Financial Investment Service Act is first, to reinforce the capital mediation function, which is weaker compared to that of the indirect financial market, and second, to reinforce protection measures for the investors to vitalize the capital market, preparing a system that provides information to enable the investors to make investment decisions based on sufficient information, with the aim to regulate unfair market activities and conflicts among financial investors as well as find efficient remedies for investors who suffered losses, and third, to reinforce the com petitiveness of the capital market by promoting competition and innovation of the financial investment industry.
The Capital Market and Financial Investment Service Act ① effectively responds to new financial products through a wide-ranged definition of financial investment products, ② classifies the financial investment industry into investment sales industry, investment mediation industry, group investment industry, investment advisory industry, consigned investment industry and trust by converting into a functional restriction system that restricts economically identical financial functions in identical ways, ③ reinforces investor protection measures, ④ and aims to expand the business realm by allowing integrated businesses among different industry sectors.
The objective of this study is to review the key investor protection measures in the Capital Market and Financial Investment Service Act, and to present problems and improvement measures to enable efficient regulation.
The Capital Market and Financial Investment Service Act ① effectively responds to new financial products through a wide-ranged definition of financial investment products, ② classifies the financial investment industry into investment sales industry, investment mediation industry, group investment industry, investment advisory industry, consigned investment industry and trust by converting into a functional restriction system that restricts economically identical financial functions in identical ways, ③ reinforces investor protection measures, ④ and aims to expand the business realm by allowing integrated businesses among different industry sectors.
The objective of this study is to review the key investor protection measures in the Capital Market and Financial Investment Service Act, and to present problems and improvement measures to enable efficient regulation.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 금융투자상품 개념의 포괄화
Ⅲ. 투자자 보호제도의 강화
Ⅳ. 겸영에 따른 이해상충
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
일본 금융상품거래법의 주요 내용과 자본시장통합법의 과제
기업법연구
2008 .12
-
국내 자본시장법제의 개선방향 - 자본시장법 개정안에 대한 의견을 중심으로 -
경영법률
2013 .01
-
금융위기와 자본시장법 : 금융소비자보호를 중심으로
비교사법
2010 .03
-
금융소비자 보호와 자본시장법의 과제
기업법연구
2008 .12
-
자본시장법상의 금융소비자 보호
기업법연구
2010 .09
-
투자자보호법제로서의 한국 자본시장법과 일본 금융상품거래법에 대한 고찰
기업법연구
2012 .06
-
Potential Risks due to Expansion in Financial Investment Product Market
[BOK] Financial Stability Report
2015 .08
-
자본시장통합법 시행과 영향
산업경제연구
2010 .10
-
韩国资本市场法集合投资制度对中国的借鉴意义
중국법연구
2016 .01
-
자본시장 기능의 통합운영과 이해상충 규제에 관한 법적 검토
은행법연구
2018 .01
-
자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률상의 금융투자자보호제도에 관한 고찰
저스티스
2008 .10
-
일본 투자서비스법의 입법 동향
기업법연구
2005 .12
-
자본시장통합법 시행이 국내 금융 시장에 미치는 영향 및 대응전략에 관한 연구 : 국내 증권 산업을 중심으로
경영논총
2009 .12
-
글로벌 금융위기와 한중 금융협력
중국과 중국학
2010 .02
-
일본 금융상품거래법상 특정투자자제도에 관한 고찰
비교사법
2010 .06
-
The Effect of Financial Market Integration on Monetary Policy and Long-term Interest Rate in Korea and Its Policy Implications
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2018 .03
-
금융투자상품에 관한 몇 가지 문제점과 보완대책
고려법학
2007 .01
-
Impact of Market Openness on Growth and Stability in Korea
Journal of International Logistics and Trade
2013 .08
-
The Factor Space in Financial Markets
Management Science and Financial Engineering
1996 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-016741224