지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Chinese trade with South East Asia had witnessed a gentle increase. However Chinese goods and half-finished products which had been exported to the market of South East Asia had accounted for small quantity. In the meanwhile, Japan had been given in the 1920s a great deal of weight in the South East Asian markets, in the 1930s it had overwhelmed metropolitan exports to their colonies. After the 1930s Japan began to build a typical perpendicular division of labor with South East Asia, in which Japan was designed to export industrial products in lieu of importing raw materials from the latter. In short the expansion of trade in Asia after the 1920s had resulted from increase Japan’s influence in East Asia including South East Asia. Also Asia economy had transformed into a perpendicular division of labor centering on Japan.
The Chinese trade with South East Asia had developed by the medium of overseas Chinese. China’s trade overall balance had been deficit but its trade with South East Asia had been surplus or beneficial. Overseas Chinese had played a pivotal role in the South East Asian economy. The economic status of overseas Chinese mounting up to millions had differed from place to place. Overseas Chinese had nearly monopolized commerce of South East Asia countries by leading wholesale trade and brokerage business. In the area of massive production and trade they had been behind only Metropolitan and Japanese corporations. The Chinese trade with South East Asia had been activated particularly in the field of rice, sugar which the overseas Chinese had dominated. China exported daily necessaries for overseas Chinese use and imported commodities including primary products.
The Chinese emigration itself had been beneficial to China proper by alleviating burden of overpopulation and reducing problem of unemployment and paupers. It also actively contributed to the development of the mother country by making a remittance and invest capital to it. Remittance was absolutely important for the family’s living. Therefore occasional diminution and suspension of remittance had threatened to living condition of millions overseas household in the southern China. In particular the economy of Guangdong and Fujian in South China depended on the amount of remittance. This remittance rescued the chronic deficit suffering Chinese economy from going bankrupt.
Overseas Chinese invested capital chiefly in home provinces, Guangdong and Fujian and an advanced city Shanghai. The investment of overseas Chinese enhanced home-city’s economic well-being. It help forward communication and transportation facilities to improve circulation of commodities and further to the development of capitalist economy. On the other hand, the decrease of overseas Chinese economy hit severe damage to the southern China to the extent of causing overall socioeconomic unrest.
In spite of their enormous power to the Chinese economy, the overseas Chinese in South East Asia did not identity their interests with those of mother country. For them, China was safe and beneficial havens for their investment. The overseas Chinese were preoccupied with familism rather than nationalism. In short, they kept collaboration with China not in the bond of patriotism but the interest of realistic gains.
The Chinese trade with South East Asia had developed by the medium of overseas Chinese. China’s trade overall balance had been deficit but its trade with South East Asia had been surplus or beneficial. Overseas Chinese had played a pivotal role in the South East Asian economy. The economic status of overseas Chinese mounting up to millions had differed from place to place. Overseas Chinese had nearly monopolized commerce of South East Asia countries by leading wholesale trade and brokerage business. In the area of massive production and trade they had been behind only Metropolitan and Japanese corporations. The Chinese trade with South East Asia had been activated particularly in the field of rice, sugar which the overseas Chinese had dominated. China exported daily necessaries for overseas Chinese use and imported commodities including primary products.
The Chinese emigration itself had been beneficial to China proper by alleviating burden of overpopulation and reducing problem of unemployment and paupers. It also actively contributed to the development of the mother country by making a remittance and invest capital to it. Remittance was absolutely important for the family’s living. Therefore occasional diminution and suspension of remittance had threatened to living condition of millions overseas household in the southern China. In particular the economy of Guangdong and Fujian in South China depended on the amount of remittance. This remittance rescued the chronic deficit suffering Chinese economy from going bankrupt.
Overseas Chinese invested capital chiefly in home provinces, Guangdong and Fujian and an advanced city Shanghai. The investment of overseas Chinese enhanced home-city’s economic well-being. It help forward communication and transportation facilities to improve circulation of commodities and further to the development of capitalist economy. On the other hand, the decrease of overseas Chinese economy hit severe damage to the southern China to the extent of causing overall socioeconomic unrest.
In spite of their enormous power to the Chinese economy, the overseas Chinese in South East Asia did not identity their interests with those of mother country. For them, China was safe and beneficial havens for their investment. The overseas Chinese were preoccupied with familism rather than nationalism. In short, they kept collaboration with China not in the bond of patriotism but the interest of realistic gains.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 중국의 동남아시아 무역의 추세와 특징
Ⅲ. 동남아시아 화교와 중국의 경제적 관계
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
abstract
참고문헌 (13)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1935.中國經濟年鑑1935 / . 經濟管理雜誌社.
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - / 2001 / 中國舊海關史料(1859-1948) 170
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1998 / 일본의 아시아교역권론에 대한 비판적 검토 2
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1996 / 80년대 이후 일본학계의 아시아 교역권 에 대한 논의-학문적 맥락과 논리를 중심으로 2
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - / / アジア域內交易と東南アジア植民地支配. 濱下武志·川勝平太編. アジア交易圈と日本工業化. 1500-1900(新版)
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - / 2001 / 中國舊海關史料(1859-1948) 170
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1998 / 일본의 아시아교역권론에 대한 비판적 검토 2
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1996 / 80년대 이후 일본학계의 아시아 교역권 에 대한 논의-학문적 맥락과 논리를 중심으로 2
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - / / アジア域內交易と東南アジア植民地支配. 濱下武志·川勝平太編. アジア交易圈と日本工業化. 1500-1900(新版)
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A Search for the Perspective on the Studies of East Asia: Centering on Chinese Studies
Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies
2001 .01
-
Trade Structure and Trade Potential in East Asia
Journal of International Logistics and Trade
2004 .06
-
中華經濟圈 對頭에 따른 우리나라의 中華資本 誘致政策 樹立에 관한 硏究
통상법률
2003 .10
-
East Asia and Korea
Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies
2001 .01
-
East Asian Economic Integration and US East Asia Trade Policy
인하대학교 정석물류통상연구원 학술대회
2009 .08
-
East Asian Economic Integration and US East Asia Trade Policy
인하대학교 정석물류통상연구원 학술대회
2009 .08
-
Rising China and the East Asia Economy
[KIEP] 월간 KIEP 세계경제
2004 .03
-
Development Cooperation for Economic Integration of East and South Asia
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2008 .12
-
화인 민족공동체의 형성과 발전 : 동남아시아 화인사단(社團)을 중심으로
전남대학교 글로벌디아스포라연구소 국제학술회의
2018 .10
-
The Chinese Dream : Does it Challenge East Asia’s Peace?
Global Asia
2015 .12
-
중화경제권 대두에 따른 우리나라의 중화자본 유치정책 수립에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2003 .12
-
일본의 對동아시아 통상정책 변화와 추진방향에 관한 고찰
무역연구
2009 .01
-
동북아시아 공동체의 의미탐구 : 역사 궤적, 그리고 관심들ㆍ관점들ㆍ이해관계의 측면에서
아세아연구
2007 .09
-
The Economic Strength of East Asia
아세아연구
1984 .01
-
북한 경제활동 動因으로서의 북한 華僑의 역할
세계지역연구논총
2012 .01
-
Order and Change in East Asia: Hegemony, Power Balancing, and the Future of U.S.-Chinese Competition
OUGHTOPIA
2020 .06
-
일제말 문학 속에 나타난 한국 지식인의 동남아 인식
동남아연구
2011 .01
-
Trade at Risk : Challenges to East Asia’s Export-Oriented Model
Global Asia
2016 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
해외 화인(華人)사회의 변화와 ‘국가’, 1840-1949
이병인
아시아문화연구
2011
.12
6 · 25戰爭에서 마오쩌둥의 역할 재조명 : 데이빗 쑤이(David Tsui) 한국국제전략연구소 譯, 『中國의 6 · 25戰爭 參戰』(서울: 다와, 2011)
최윤철
군사
2017
.03
청일전쟁 전황(戰況)과 ‘조선의 독립’ 문제에 대한 열강의 정책
석화정
군사
2017
.03
제1차 세계대전과 프랑스의 식민지인 병사 : ‘세네갈 보병’을 중심으로
이재원
프랑스사 연구
2014
.08
아시아의 지중해 : 13세기~21세기 중국, 일본, 동남아 해항도시와 교역네트워크 : François Gipouloux, Cheltenham, UK : Edward Elgar, 2011, 424p, $160, ISBN : 0857934279, 978-0857934277
노영순
해항도시문화교섭학
2013
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-016110070