지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
After the emancipation from the Japanese colonial domination in 1945, the United States Army Military Government in Korea(USAMGIK) had established the military rule for about 3 years. The military government tried to provide for the continued functioning of the ordinary civil and criminal courts of Korea and for the rapid removal of judges and other court personnel who have been flagrant exponents of militant Japanese nationalism. The military government established the military occupation courts to fulfill the purpose of occupation. The Military occupation Courts are composed of two types, namely Military Commissions and Provost Courts. Military Commission consists of not less than three officers, one of whom shall be a qualified lawyer, if available. Provost Court consists of one or more officers. The Military Occupation Courts shall have power to try only such cases as are properly referred to them by the appointing authority or by subordinate officers designated authority. On 11 April 1947, the Military Governor gave a message to USAMGIK units that no Korean should be tried in a Provost Court without permission of Headquarters USAMGIK. But there were two types of cases in which Korean courts showed weakness: those involving trial and punishment of rioters and those involving embezzlement and fraud by Korean officials of vested companies. On 18 August 1947, the Provost Court was reestablished at Kwangju because the Korean court trials did not satisfied the Military Government.
Before the Military Occupation Courts, the problems enumerated below were encountered more at the beginning of the occupation. (1) Inconsistency of witnesses as to testimony given at the time of investigation and the time of trial. (2) Korean investigative authorities attitude towards securing confessions with little regard for their having been voluntarily made. (3) Korean's failure to comprehend the sanctity of a statement made under oath or affirmation. (4) Degree of credibility of Korean witnesses is based on extent of his education. (5) Korean witnesses refusal to testify against teachers and public benefactors. (6) Effect of restoration of property taken or restitution for damages incurred upon Korean witnesses. (7) Language barrier as utilized by the Korean witnesses. The American officers unfamiliar with the subtleties of oriental rank inevitably made mistakes.
Before the Military Occupation Courts, the problems enumerated below were encountered more at the beginning of the occupation. (1) Inconsistency of witnesses as to testimony given at the time of investigation and the time of trial. (2) Korean investigative authorities attitude towards securing confessions with little regard for their having been voluntarily made. (3) Korean's failure to comprehend the sanctity of a statement made under oath or affirmation. (4) Degree of credibility of Korean witnesses is based on extent of his education. (5) Korean witnesses refusal to testify against teachers and public benefactors. (6) Effect of restoration of property taken or restitution for damages incurred upon Korean witnesses. (7) Language barrier as utilized by the Korean witnesses. The American officers unfamiliar with the subtleties of oriental rank inevitably made mistakes.
목차
Ⅰ. 해방공간에서의 미국 사법제도와의 만남
Ⅱ. 미군정기의 군정재판제도
Ⅲ. 점령재판소의 실제 운영
Ⅳ. 마치며
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
군사법원의 민간인에 대한 재판권
한국군사학논집
2016 .02
-
개정 군사법원법의 쟁점과 그 개선방안
형사법연구
2011 .01
-
민군관계와 국방리더십의 발전방향
군사학연구
2006 .01
-
Korea's Military Service Policy Issues and Directions for Mid- & Long-term Development
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2011 .01
-
군사법원 필요성과 목적에 대한 고찰
저스티스
2015 .04
-
1950년대 한국군의 미국 군사유학 시행과 그 영향
군사
2016 .03
-
한국 군사사상사 연구의 흐름과 근세 군사사상의 일례 - 15세기 군사사상가 양성지(梁誠之)를 중심으로 -
군사학연구
2009 .01
-
군 수사절차상 인신구속제도의 문제점과 개선방안
형사정책연구
2003 .09
-
미군 교범으로 살펴본 2차 세계대전 군 체육 역사의 재조명
한국군사학논집
2019 .06
-
International Comparison of Military Welfare Service in the U.S., U.K. and Germany and Its Implications for Korean Military Welfare Service
무역연구
2016 .01
-
군사법제도의 개선방안
형사법연구
2005 .01
-
한국군 체육인사제도의 변천과정과 방향
한국군사학논집
2017 .10
-
Military Organizational Cohesion and the 2006 Military Coup in Thailand
한국군사학논집
2010 .02
-
북한 군사전략의 역사적 고찰
군사
2019 .09
-
군사학 학문연구 동향 탐색: 한국군사학논총 논문 분석을 중심으로
한국군사학논총
2019 .01
-
군사법제도 발전방향 모색을 위한 연구
한국경찰학회보
2017 .01
-
북한의 민군관계: 군 역할을 중심으로
북한연구학회보
2009 .01
-
한국 국방개혁과 「818계획」의 교훈
군사
2018 .03
-
군사기지 및 군사시설보호법의 평가와 과제
법과 정책연구
2008 .01
-
군과 지역사회 간 상생기반의 군사시설 이전방안- ‘기부 대 양여 사례분석’을 중심으로 -
한국군사학논총
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-362-016142227