지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The legal theory of oppression in the close corporation setting has been studied in depth in Korea. However, it should be noted that many, if not most, closely held businesses in the United States of America, are not structured as close corporations, but as Limited Liability Companies (“LLCs”). Further, Korea is in the process of introducing LLC corporate form, patterned after the American LLC form, into the Korean system. It is therefore critical to ask whether the LLC form of small and medium sized business organization poses the same risks of oppression to minority owners (the so-called “members”), and if so, how the judiciary and the legislature can act to minimize or reduce such risks.
This paper explores these questions and concerns on LLCs and concludes that minority LLC members are vulnerable to the same risks of oppression as the minority shareholders of close corporations have been facing historically. It also maintains that the legal theory of “oppression” developed in the close corporation setting shall apply with the same force to LLCs. In other words, LLC minority members will need a protective oppression doctrine just like their close corporation cousins. Korean judiciary and legislature must keep this in their minds when they actually deal with LLC governance issues.
Following the introduction in Part Ⅰ, Part Ⅱ of this article reviews the background of the emergence and the development of LLCs in the U.S.A. In Part Ⅲ, the oppression doctrine in the close corporation setting is reviewed. In Part Ⅳ, it explores the question as to whether LLC owners will be subject to the same risks to which the minority shareholders of close corporation have been exposed. In Part V, it is concluded that the same oppression doctrine must apply to LLCs and that Korean judiciary and legislature must attempt to protect the LLC minority members using the oppression doctrine.
This paper explores these questions and concerns on LLCs and concludes that minority LLC members are vulnerable to the same risks of oppression as the minority shareholders of close corporations have been facing historically. It also maintains that the legal theory of “oppression” developed in the close corporation setting shall apply with the same force to LLCs. In other words, LLC minority members will need a protective oppression doctrine just like their close corporation cousins. Korean judiciary and legislature must keep this in their minds when they actually deal with LLC governance issues.
Following the introduction in Part Ⅰ, Part Ⅱ of this article reviews the background of the emergence and the development of LLCs in the U.S.A. In Part Ⅲ, the oppression doctrine in the close corporation setting is reviewed. In Part Ⅳ, it explores the question as to whether LLC owners will be subject to the same risks to which the minority shareholders of close corporation have been exposed. In Part V, it is concluded that the same oppression doctrine must apply to LLCs and that Korean judiciary and legislature must attempt to protect the LLC minority members using the oppression doctrine.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 미국 LLC제도의 배경 및 활성화 경위
Ⅲ. 폐쇄회사 소수자에 대한 억압(Oppression)과 소수자 보호법리
Ⅳ. LLC 환경하의 억압의 존재 가능성
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
유한책임회사제도에 대한 법이론적 검토
법학연구
2007 .08
-
유한책임회사에 있어서 채권자보호를 위한 규제
원광법학
2014 .01
-
일본의 LLC 입법과 미국의 LLC 입법의 비교
비교사법
2008 .09
-
미국 LLC법상 몇 가지 쟁점에 관한 고찰
法學論文集
2011 .01
-
상법상 유한책임회사와 미국 LLC의 비교 연구
경영법률
2016 .01
-
합자조합과 유한책임회사에 관한 법적 검토
강원법학
2012 .02
-
새로운 共同企業 類型의 導入에 관한 硏究 : 有限責任會社를 中心으로
기업법연구
2008 .06
-
상법상 유한책임회사제도의 도입과 전망 : 비교법적 고찰을 중심으로
기업법연구
2015 .12
-
유한책임회사에 관한 연구 : 회사 종류의 체계화와 관련하여
법학논총
2017 .05
-
會社의 組織變更에 대한 課稅 小考
강원법학
2006 .06
-
미국 LLC, LLP제도의 도입과 세법상 대응
조세법연구
2007 .08
-
중국 회사법상 유한책임회사 도입의 과제 ― 비교법적 검토 ―
법과 정책연구
2012 .01
-
우리나라 소규모 기업의 이중과세문제와 S 주식회사
기업법연구
2012 .12
-
미국법상 S 주식회사제도에 관한 소고
기업법연구
2012 .06
-
새로운 기업형태의 도입에 관한 상법개정안에 대한 소고
경영법률
2007 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-016214882