메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국생활환경학회 한국생활환경학회지 한국생활환경학회지 제11권 제2호
발행연도
2004.6
수록면
129 - 133 (5page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
To examine the relationships of the level of energy expenditure estimated by 3-day activity record (3AR) and 1-day activity recall (1AR) and to explore a physical activity pattern of a day, a total of 118 college men (n=30, 22 yrs, 68 ㎏, 176 ㎝) and women (n=88, 21 yrs, 55 ㎏, 164 ㎝) participated in the study. They were instructed to record daily activities and time spent for the activity in details for each of 3AR and 1AR. The records were transformed to energy expenditure per day (㎉/day) after each activity was coded to MET values (Ainsworth et al., 1993). The 3AR vs 1AR were 2719±550 vs 2825±556 ㎉ and 2215±350 vs 2311±430 ㎉ for men and women, respectively (p<0.05), and the energy expenditure for total was 2336±466 vs 2439±512 ㎉ for men vs women (p<0.05). The Pearson Correlation between 3AR and 1AR was r=0.754 and r=0.807 for men and women respectively (p<0.001). The most of the time of a day was spent within a activity of intensity under 4 MET and they spent less than 4 hours for 2.1-4 MET. The average variation of daily activity level in 3AR was 50 ㎉ higher in men (355± 220 ㎉) than women (298±235 ㎉) (p>0.05), but the maximal variation of daily activity was more than 100 ㎉ wider in men (556±335 ㎉) than in women (440±342 ㎉) (p<0.05). Based on the results, the 1AR was consistently higher than 3AR for about 100 ㎉. When the daily variation of activity level was 300 ㎉ and the variation was larger for men, in particular, were counted, the 1AR did not appear to be appropriate tool to estimate the daily expenditure level. However, the 1AR reported consistent activity level and seemed to be representative for the mass population study.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 연구 방법
3. 결과
4. 논의
5. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-590-016219421