지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to investigate the ecological imagination manifested in the poems written by Jeong Ji-yong and Baek Seok from their views of nature. Both the poets resorted to an ecological consciousness of dreaming of the recovery of organic nature embedded in the traditional thoughts of the Orient as they wrote their poems. The ecological consciousness ultimately manifested itself in their infinite love for the people's language and nature. which put their works under crucial roles in the history of modern poetry.
In the early period, Jeong described his bleak hometown. missing the perfect and rich nature. In the middle period, he saw nature as an equal creature to humans and pursued a world where humans and everything that's not human coexisted in his works. And the late period was dominated by his idea that humans must follow the ways of nature since they were inferior to nature. Meanwhile. Baek expressed his awe for natural things and animals other than humans. described harmony between man and nature or natural objects that consoled humans. and sometimes used the interactions between natural objects to depict a harmonious life between man and nature. By raising the status of nature's existence. he tried to show that a rich and perfect paradise would happen only when every being was in its complete existence.
Both Jeong and Baek grew up in the period when the traditional customs still remained and the influences of modern times started to gain force. The 1930s when they lived can be characterized by a combination of modern and traditional issues. Both the poets were able to perceive nature differently beyond the modern vision even though they were modern individuals themselves. Employing new formats in their poems. they overcame the literary ideality that's isolated from the reality and shared by many other poets during the days. They saw nature as a living creature and tried to save mankind in nature. Such ecological imagination of theirs depicted the reality of modernization by the ruling Japanese colonialists in a critical manner. which proves that the poets claim a significant place in the history of modern poetry.
In the early period, Jeong described his bleak hometown. missing the perfect and rich nature. In the middle period, he saw nature as an equal creature to humans and pursued a world where humans and everything that's not human coexisted in his works. And the late period was dominated by his idea that humans must follow the ways of nature since they were inferior to nature. Meanwhile. Baek expressed his awe for natural things and animals other than humans. described harmony between man and nature or natural objects that consoled humans. and sometimes used the interactions between natural objects to depict a harmonious life between man and nature. By raising the status of nature's existence. he tried to show that a rich and perfect paradise would happen only when every being was in its complete existence.
Both Jeong and Baek grew up in the period when the traditional customs still remained and the influences of modern times started to gain force. The 1930s when they lived can be characterized by a combination of modern and traditional issues. Both the poets were able to perceive nature differently beyond the modern vision even though they were modern individuals themselves. Employing new formats in their poems. they overcame the literary ideality that's isolated from the reality and shared by many other poets during the days. They saw nature as a living creature and tried to save mankind in nature. Such ecological imagination of theirs depicted the reality of modernization by the ruling Japanese colonialists in a critical manner. which proves that the poets claim a significant place in the history of modern poetry.
목차
1. 서론
2. 근대시와 생태학적 상상력
3. 정지용과 백석 시에 나타난 생태학적 상상력
4. 정지용과 백석 시의 생태학적 상상력의 의미
5. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (28)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
정지용과 백석 시의 전통 생태의식 비교 연구 : 신화적 세계관을 중심으로
어문학
2008 .03
-
한국 자연시에 나타난 은유 연구 : 박목월ㆍ박용래 시를 중심으로
한국시학연구
2007 .12
-
심종문 湘西 문학세계가 지닌 생태여성주의의 가능성
중국문화연구
2016 .11
-
Man and Nature
인간연구
2017 .01
-
한국 근대시의 자연 형상과 전통적 성격
한국시학연구
2006 .08
-
한국 현대시에 나타난 기독교적 자연관
한국현대문학연구
2006 .06
-
소설의 언어에 내재한 생태학적 지평
현대소설연구
2000 .12
-
한국 현대시에 나타난 서학적(西學的) 자연관 : 윤동주와 김종삼의 시를 중심으로
문학과환경
2009 .06
-
백석 시의 생태학적 의인화와 인간애
문학과환경
2012 .12
-
근대성과 자연합일의 시
한국시학연구
2002 .05
-
구상 시의 자연관에 나타난 생태인식 연구
문학과환경
2009 .12
-
워즈워스의 시에 대한 생태학적 접근
영어영문학연구
2003 .01
-
생태학적 텍스트로서의 룃키의 시 : 경외로운 작은 것들의 자극
문학과환경
2008 .06
-
“주변적” 존재로의 회귀 - 에밀리 디킨슨의 생태학적 상상력
19세기 영어권 문학
2010 .02
-
생태학으로 본 황석우 시의 자연 - 몸의 사유방식을 중심으로 -
우리말글
2004 .12
-
의미의 자연과 사실의 자연 -노자의 경우
동서철학연구
2018 .01
-
로렌스와 문학생태학
D. H. 로렌스 연구
2010 .01
-
생태동시의 의의와 가능성 : 김명수, 이병용의 동시를 중심으로
문학과환경
2008 .12
-
개발과 기독교
한국기독교신학논총
2003 .10
-
미국의 자연기 : 장르의 위상·특징·계보
문학과환경
2005 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-016240550