메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국시학회 한국시학연구 한국시학연구 제14호
발행연도
2005.12
수록면
27 - 49 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article studied the describing point of view of the history of the published korean modern poems. At the end of late 1950s, the history of Korean modern poems had its own field out of the History of Korean literature or History of Korean modern literature. As the History of Korean literature or History of Korean modern literature showed the trend of the society, the history of the poem also showed the same trend at that time. But there wes a movement to add to the special history of the poem such as ‘the history of the philosophy‘, ’national poem‘ and ‘labor poem’, which gave the possibility of totally organized history of the poem. But the problem was that it was still involved in the boundary of political and social categories.
According to the Robert E. Spiller, the type of the history of the literature can largely be divided into three. The first is the flat type of chronological history of the literature. The second is the history of literature adopting the advanced concept to overcome the problem that the chronological history of the literature can not show the correlation which is pointed as a defect of chronological history of the literature. Through this point of view, we are able to know that the development of the literature is being formed, developed, and progressed by considering the correlation between part and part or between part and the all. Finally, there is a history of the literature focused on the basic concept that the history of the literature should be not only the literature itself, but also history. This point of view can have the wide range of describing method and point of view because it is based on the history of literature which has the super―spatiotemporal feature as a literature, and also has the spatiotemporal feature as a history.
Considering these types of history of literature, the thing that we should reconsider when we describe the history of the poem is that we still have the chronological method as a flat history of literature. As Spiller, of course, point out, this is a basic and core work to describe the history of literature. But describing the history of literature based on the achievement of these basic works should be reconsidered including the method of dividing the terms by 10 years.
Furthermore, when describing the history of the poem, the various points of view, needed to intend to the history of literature as a history itself as well as literature, will be inquired. Among the achievements in the field of history of literature, the approaches of forms and the history of philosophy are those which shows the variety of the history of literature. Through these types of research, I hope the history of literature which has the total methodology as well as the various points of view should be developed.

목차

1. 문제제기
2. 방법론의 탐구
3. 社會史的 경향
4. 精神史의 가능성
5. 남는 문제
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-811-016459690