지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
From antiquity, history and literature actively intertwined and the reflection on history and the question of “what is history?” were usually made in close relations to literature. However, as modern history tried to establish itself as an independent discipline, it had to intentionally break away from literature - this is how modern history obtained its identity. Separation of history and literature in modern history took on two aspects: first, it refused imagination and second, it excluded narrativity. Yet, in these days, literature and history are brought together again with history embracing imagination and narration, and the boundary between history and literature is put to question. Such change is evident in ‘microstoria’ and interpretation of history by post-structuralism. Fictionality and narrativity in history which were once evicted and erased in modern history are making their return with greater power.
Today, there is a growing awareness of fictionality and narrativity in historical depiction and history is regarded as a written material of a historian, a narrator of history. This view shed light on the fundamental similarity between history and literature and such a view affected the way literature dealt with historical elements and documents. Contemporary historical fiction does not have to fully respect the objective facts of historical entities or accept the restraint posed by historical reality. In a freer manner, contemporary historical fiction can fictionalize and give contemporary interpretation to history. Examples of this historical fiction would be novels written by authors such as Kim Hun, Kim Yeong-ha, Seong Seok-je, and Kim Yeon-su. The authority of historical reality which was the basis of literary interpretation in historical fiction became weakened. As a result, fictional creativity, which intervene with historical records and reformulate or recreate the truth, and its meaning have gained great strength. In this respect, history is turning into fiction and fiction is turning into history. Unlike in the past when history and literature were categorized under the dichotomy of ‘reality / fiction,' ‘objectivity / subjectivity,' and ‘serious / not serious,' today, history and literature are crisscrossing, colliding and converging. Consequently, different types of writing are being produced.
Today, there is a growing awareness of fictionality and narrativity in historical depiction and history is regarded as a written material of a historian, a narrator of history. This view shed light on the fundamental similarity between history and literature and such a view affected the way literature dealt with historical elements and documents. Contemporary historical fiction does not have to fully respect the objective facts of historical entities or accept the restraint posed by historical reality. In a freer manner, contemporary historical fiction can fictionalize and give contemporary interpretation to history. Examples of this historical fiction would be novels written by authors such as Kim Hun, Kim Yeong-ha, Seong Seok-je, and Kim Yeon-su. The authority of historical reality which was the basis of literary interpretation in historical fiction became weakened. As a result, fictional creativity, which intervene with historical records and reformulate or recreate the truth, and its meaning have gained great strength. In this respect, history is turning into fiction and fiction is turning into history. Unlike in the past when history and literature were categorized under the dichotomy of ‘reality / fiction,' ‘objectivity / subjectivity,' and ‘serious / not serious,' today, history and literature are crisscrossing, colliding and converging. Consequently, different types of writing are being produced.
목차
1. 역사와 문학의 다층적 관계
2. 문학을 향해 가는 역사들
3. 역사소설에 반영된 새로운 역사들
4. 역사의 허구화와 허구의 역사화
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
포스트모던 역사인식과 역사학습
역사교육
2000 .06
-
現代詩史 記述方法 考察
한국시학연구
2005 .12
-
전근대 국사의 형성과 그 발전
韓國史學史學報
2008 .01
-
중국고전 문학사 다시 쓰기(rewriting) 작업을 위한 몇 가지 전제
중국학논총
2007 .01
-
역사교육과 역사학의 거리
역사교육
2016 .06
-
歷史의 有用性과 歷史敎育目標
역사교육
2003 .09
-
역사교사의 인지적 특성이 역사수업에 미치는 영향
역사교육
2004 .03
-
한국사 연구와 역사교육에서 정체성과 역동성, 공동체 정신
역사교육
2016 .06
-
역사와 문학을 보는 관점 : 장보고계 역사소설의 비교 및 전망
동악어문학
2011 .02
-
고등학교 과정에서 한국 근현대사 수업의 현황과 전개
역사와실학
2006 .09
-
國史敎材에서 文學作品의 활용 실태와 내용 선정의 방향
역사와경계
2010 .12
-
영화를 통한 중국현대사 이해와 교육 : 중국혁명 관련 영화를 중심으로
역사와경계
2008 .03
-
초등학교 향토사교육의 실제와 지향점
역사교육
2003 .09
-
역사교육 계열화를 위한 고등학교 국사교육 내용구성 방안
역사와 담론
2005 .04
-
The Case of Korean History
Korea Journal
1970 .11
-
중학교 국사교육의 의미와 내용구성
역사교육
2012 .12
-
동북아 시대에서 한국사 서술과 역사교육 : ‘국사’를 넘어서
역사교육
2005 .09
-
지구사의 미래와 역사의 재개념화
역사학보
2008 .12
-
역사교육의 담론과 학문적 가능성
역사교육
2006 .03
-
10학년 〈역사〉 교육과정의 ‘비교’ 내용 구성 방향
역사와 세계
2009 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-015184886