메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第70輯
발행연도
2000.4
수록면
115 - 137 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In the early 6th-century, Paekje waged war against Banpa in the areas of Gimun and Daesa in attempts to advance into Kaya area. Previous research has argued that Gimun and Daesa areas were located in the Sumjin River Valley. This argument has supported such hypotheses as "Imna-Ilbonbu" Hypothesis, "Modified Imna-Ilbonbu" Hypothesis, and "Independent Development of Kava" Hypothesis. However, it is my contention that "Ginmun" and "Daesa" were located not In the Sumjin River Vally, but in the Nakdong River Valley. According to Kyechegi, Paekje levied war against Banpa over Gimun and Daesa areas. This war reflects Bonpa's resistance against Paekje s advance into Kaya from the north, but not "Big Kaya's" or Dac-Kaya's resistance against Paekje's advance from the Sumjin River Valley into Kaya.
As is manifested from an historical evidence of Paekje's conquest of Kaya Chilgook (Seven Kaya Kingdoms) in A.D. 369, Paekje had captured Kaya from the north. Accordingly, we can interpret the dispute between Paekje and Banpa surrounding Gimun and Daesa not in terms of Paekje s first advance into Kaya area, but in terms of Paekje s long-term attacks from the north. In other words, the event of the antagonism between Paekje and Banpa concerning Gimun and Daesa results from the process of increasing influence over Kaya from Paekje s side. In the same context, we can note such provincial ministers as "goon-ryong" (the head of the county) and "sung-ju" (the lord of the castle) who were stationed in the Kaya area in the 6th century in attempts to extend their direct influence upon the area.
Having understood this, we need to reexamine "Imna-Ilbonbu" Hypothesis, "Modified Imna-Ilbonbu" Hypothesis, and "Independent Development of Kaya" Hypothesis, according to which Oe (Japan=Yamato) had influence upon the Kaya area before Packje advanced into the latter. Although the dispute over Gimun and Daesa reveals Paekje's first invasion into the Kaya area, the argument that Yamato (Oe) made influence upon this area or that Kaya had made an independent development will lose its ground if Gimun and Daesa areas were located in the Nakdong River Valley.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제제기
Ⅱ. ‘己汶’ㆍ‘帶沙’ 관계 기사의 검토
Ⅲ. ‘帶沙’의 비정
Ⅳ. ‘己汶’의 비정
Ⅴ. ‘伴跛’의 실체
Ⅵ. 맺는말

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-016462495