지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The primary objective of this study is to elucidate the universal nature of human rights and its trade-offs thesis; and to examine current characteristics of democracy in South Korea in relation to the ‘candle light demonstration’ which was proceeded from May 2008 to August 2008.
First of all, on the basis of Jack Donnelly’s human rights theory on universalism and relativism, this study is exploring which discourse is more applicable to the human rights situation in the modern society. In view of the Korean history, authoritarian governments in particular mounted a challenge to universal human rights and democracy. Moreover, the logic of ‘Korean style democracy’ has been used by Korean repressive status to support the trade-off proposition: that a certain degree of authoritarianism is necessary to make a state stable, in terms of national security, maintenance of social stability and order, and social welfare including spectacular economic growth, and that such dimensions will ultimately facilitate the promotion of human rights.
However, in recent decades the history of human rights in South Korea offered no promise or proof that human rights will be extended to citizens under repressive social situation with economic development. Authoritarian leaders have justified their failure to protect human rights not only as a sacrifice necessary to ensure the success of their economic development strategy, but also as essential for the maintenance of law and order.
Basing itself on an understanding of human rights perspectives and on practices in modern Korean history, this study concludes that various restrictions on human rights cannot be justified in the name of national security, maintenance of law and order, and economic growth; and that human rights, a critical factor of desirable democracy, cannot be pushed aside until political and economic situation ard consolidated. In the same context, a country's democratic policies should not the political interests of abusive governments, but basic human rights.
First of all, on the basis of Jack Donnelly’s human rights theory on universalism and relativism, this study is exploring which discourse is more applicable to the human rights situation in the modern society. In view of the Korean history, authoritarian governments in particular mounted a challenge to universal human rights and democracy. Moreover, the logic of ‘Korean style democracy’ has been used by Korean repressive status to support the trade-off proposition: that a certain degree of authoritarianism is necessary to make a state stable, in terms of national security, maintenance of social stability and order, and social welfare including spectacular economic growth, and that such dimensions will ultimately facilitate the promotion of human rights.
However, in recent decades the history of human rights in South Korea offered no promise or proof that human rights will be extended to citizens under repressive social situation with economic development. Authoritarian leaders have justified their failure to protect human rights not only as a sacrifice necessary to ensure the success of their economic development strategy, but also as essential for the maintenance of law and order.
Basing itself on an understanding of human rights perspectives and on practices in modern Korean history, this study concludes that various restrictions on human rights cannot be justified in the name of national security, maintenance of law and order, and economic growth; and that human rights, a critical factor of desirable democracy, cannot be pushed aside until political and economic situation ard consolidated. In the same context, a country's democratic policies should not the political interests of abusive governments, but basic human rights.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 논의를 위한 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 인권 흥정논리와 ‘한국식 민주주의’
Ⅳ. 인권 흥정논리에 대한 저항과 시민불복종
Ⅴ. 인권담론과 한국 민주주의의 재조명
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
abstract
참고문헌 (32)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
[일반논문]21세기의 민주주의와 인권 사상
민주주의와 인권
2001 .10
-
국내적 인권과 국제적 인권? : 인권 개념의 이중성에 대한 소고
한양법학
2011 .08
-
인권사상의 현대적 전개
법학연구
2005 .12
-
인권의 국제적 실천성에 대한 연구
사회과학연구
2006 .02
-
Individual Freedom and Human Rights Community : A Sociological Intervention
Journal of Asian Sociology
2011 .07
-
사람들은 어떻게 인권을 평가하는가? : 인권지표, 민주주의 인식, 사회경제적 지위와의 관계를 중심으로
한국사회학
2018 .02
-
해외진출 한국기업의 인권침해에 대한 책임구성 고찰
일감법학
2013 .01
-
Regional Human Rights Mechanism and the Alternatives for Asia
동북아법연구
2017 .01
-
하버마스의 인권 개념에 관하여
법철학연구
2011 .08
-
인권개념의 ‘세대’적 접근에 대한 비판적 고찰
법학연구
2018 .05
-
[일반논문]인권의 보편성 문제
민주주의와 인권
2001 .04
-
영국의 인권법과 인권기관
유럽헌법연구
2011 .01
-
현대인권론과 공리주의 -인권의 정당화-
법철학연구
2009 .05
-
[동아시아연구]말레이시아의 인권과 민주주의, 그리고 이슬람
민주주의와 인권
2001 .10
-
Toward Human Rights in the Local Community : Multiple Approaches for Implementation
Journal of Asian Sociology
2010 .07
-
[동아시아연구]한국에서의 인권개념 형성 과정
민주주의와 인권
2001 .10
-
북한 인권문제에 대한 중국의 입장
국제정치연구
2011 .12
-
Activities of the UN Human Rights Council and Their Impact on the Human Rights Issues in North Korea
EAI 이슈브리핑
2016 .02
-
South Korea’s Role for the Improvement of North Korea Human Rights : A Proposal of ‘Korea Human Rights’
한국국제정치학회 기타간행물
2011 .06
-
Two Concepts of Human Rights in Contemporary Korea
Journal of Asian Sociology
2010 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-015041812