메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기업법학회 기업법연구 企業法硏究 第22卷 第3號
발행연도
2008.9
수록면
413 - 435 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
On July 26 2007. United States President George W Bush signed into law the Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007 (FINSA), revising US national security reviews of foreign investment in US companies. FINSA will make the foreign investment reviews more rigorous, particularly for transactions in certain sensitive sectors, including critical infrastructure and technologies, as well as transactions involving an entity controlled by a foreign government. FINSA is a response to the controversies surrounding China National Offshore Oil Corporation's (CNOOC) unsolicited bid for Unocal in July 2005 and Dubai Ports World's (DPW) February 2006 attempt to acquire port facilities in the United States. Both transactions generated intense political opposition and heightened interest in national security issues arising from foreign acquisitions by state-owned entities of US companies. FINSA modifies the operation of the interagency Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which reviews the national security implications of foreign acquisitions, mergers and investments in US companies. FINSA amends the CFIUS review process by: (ⅰ) expanding the concept of "national security" to expressly include transactions involving critical infrastructure (including energy assets) and critical technologies: (ⅱ) heightening CFIUS scrutiny for all transactions involving entities controlled by foreign governments: (ⅲ) empowering CFIUS with the authority to negotiate, impose and enforce conditions necessary to mitigate any threat to national security arising from a transaction: (ⅳ) eliminating the safe harbour that protected transactions cleared by CFIUS from future scrutiny, if parties to the transaction intentionally and materially breach any term of a mitigation agreement and CFIUS determines that no other remedies are available to remedy such breach: (ⅴ) formalizing CFIUS' consultations with Congress, and (ⅵ) amending the mechanisms used to withdraw and re-file notices. FINSA does not change the voluntary nature of the CFIUS filing process.
This trends of FINSA are very suggestive to Korean legislation about the foreign investment. Especially I think the member of the foreign investment Committee must be added, the concept of the national security must be enlarged and the superintendence of National Assembly must be strengthened.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. FINSA의 제정배경
Ⅲ. FINSA의 주요내용
Ⅳ. 결론(시사점)
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0