지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The pain and damages that the war with the Manchu inflicted upon the Joseon people were huge and horrific. Countless Joseon people were killed in the Qing invasion, and hundreds of thousands of people were captured and brought back to Qing. Outgoing population which mounted to hundreds of thousands significantly disturbed the political stability of Joseon and also severly undermined the social and economic basis of the Joseon society. And the Qing dynasty tried to force the Joseon hands to do whatever Qing wanted them to do, by exploiting no other than the 'captives' issue.
The reason so many people were captured during the war with the Manchu which starred in the Byeongja year was because Qing troops were overly interested in capturing people. They considered captives as 'achievements that cost Manchu blood', and therefore deeply committed themselves to obtaining more and more captives. They also strongly required that the fled Juhwae people to be returned to them immediately. Yet the Joseon government was also responsible for such situation. It anticipated Qing's invasion yet did not do enough to defend the country. Military commanders guarding the frontline abandoned their posts without fighting the invading forces, and allowed the Qing troops to come deeper inside Korean territory. The commanders in the Ganghwa - do island restricted the boat traffic in order to prevent residents in the outskirt areas of the capital from entering Ganghwa - do, yet failed to come up with an adequate defense plan of the island itself.
The captives had to endure brutal and cruel treatments. From their initial captivity by the Qing forces, to their encampment at the Qing military bases, on their transport to Shenyang, and after their arrival in Shenyang, before they either escaped or were returned to Joseon, they had to suffer in pain and remain being frightened of the ever - present possibility of an imminent death.
The Joseon government tried to bring them back, but it was never an easy task. High ranking officials and other wealthy figures intervened in the negotiations and jacked - up the price for bringing someone back, and the governmental officials too committed a series of malpractices and misdeeds in the actual process of bringing the captives home. Also, the government did not do enough to care for the people who fled back to Joseon or returned to their home country. After a few years, the issue was reduced from a 'government - involved issue' to an 'individual errand'. The episode of An Chu Weon and An Dan who tried to escape Qing after decades of captivity yet failed to do so, were typically tragic examples.
The reason so many people were captured during the war with the Manchu which starred in the Byeongja year was because Qing troops were overly interested in capturing people. They considered captives as 'achievements that cost Manchu blood', and therefore deeply committed themselves to obtaining more and more captives. They also strongly required that the fled Juhwae people to be returned to them immediately. Yet the Joseon government was also responsible for such situation. It anticipated Qing's invasion yet did not do enough to defend the country. Military commanders guarding the frontline abandoned their posts without fighting the invading forces, and allowed the Qing troops to come deeper inside Korean territory. The commanders in the Ganghwa - do island restricted the boat traffic in order to prevent residents in the outskirt areas of the capital from entering Ganghwa - do, yet failed to come up with an adequate defense plan of the island itself.
The captives had to endure brutal and cruel treatments. From their initial captivity by the Qing forces, to their encampment at the Qing military bases, on their transport to Shenyang, and after their arrival in Shenyang, before they either escaped or were returned to Joseon, they had to suffer in pain and remain being frightened of the ever - present possibility of an imminent death.
The Joseon government tried to bring them back, but it was never an easy task. High ranking officials and other wealthy figures intervened in the negotiations and jacked - up the price for bringing someone back, and the governmental officials too committed a series of malpractices and misdeeds in the actual process of bringing the captives home. Also, the government did not do enough to care for the people who fled back to Joseon or returned to their home country. After a few years, the issue was reduced from a 'government - involved issue' to an 'individual errand'. The episode of An Chu Weon and An Dan who tried to escape Qing after decades of captivity yet failed to do so, were typically tragic examples.
목차
머리말
1. 전쟁 피해의 양상과 ‘피로인 문제’의 심각성
2. 대규모 피로인 발생의 원인과 주회인 문제
3. 피로인들의 고통
4. 정부의 ‘피로인 문제’ 대책과 귀결
5. 안추원과 안단의 비극
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (93)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
병자호란기 조선 被虜人의 胡地체험과 삶
동양고전연구
2008 .01
-
明淸교체기 전쟁 포로의 특수성과 「金英哲傳」
동악어문학
2014 .08
-
임진왜란에 납치된 조선인과 정보의 교류
사학연구
2004 .06
-
임진왜란기 납치된 조선인의 일본 잔류 배경과 그들의 정체성 인식
한국사연구
2008 .03
-
壬亂 被虜者의 捕虜體驗 漢詩硏究壬亂 被虜者의 捕虜體驗 漢詩硏究鄭希得을 중심으로
漢文敎育論集
2003 .01
-
임진왜란(壬辰倭亂) 피로인(被虜人)에 대한 회답겸쇄환사(回答兼刷還使)의 인식 변화
동악어문학
2014 .08
-
Babylonian Exile or Captive? (pp. 91-109)
구약논단
2001 .10
-
임진왜란 被擄人과 逃還人들의 흔적을 찾아서 ― 17세기 초 호적으로부터
대동문화연구
2020 .01
-
Changing Process and Causes of Manchu Language in Heihe District
알타이학보
2008 .01
-
만주어 표기에 반영된 만주어와 한어의 구개음화
언어학
2018 .04
-
Linguistic and Cultural Limits of Manchu Poetry in Comparison with Chinese
알타이학보
2007 .01
-
조선의 18세기와 탈중화 문제
역사학보
2012 .03
-
만주제국인가 청 제국인가 - 최근 미국의 청대사 연구동향을 중심으로 -
史叢(사총)
2011 .01
-
병자호란 연구의 새로운 定礎 [서평] 구범진(2019), 병자호란, 홍타이지의 전쟁, 까치, 403쪽.
인문논총
2019 .01
-
聖諭廣訓의 만주어 연구
알타이학보
2013 .01
-
<淸學四書>에 나타난 만주어의 격 체계 연구－근대 한국어와의 비교를 중심으로－
이중언어학
2011 .01
-
滿語 복수에 대하여
비교민속학
1993 .06
-
明淸交替 시기 朝中關係의 추이
동양사학연구
2017 .09
-
滿文 일기 《閒窓錄夢》을 통해 본 보오이(booi)의 삶과 정체성
중국문학
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
문명과 제국 사이 : 병자호란 전후시기 주화·척화논쟁을 통해 본 조선 지식관료층의‘國’표상
손애리
한국동양정치사상사연구
2011
.09
임진왜란기 납치된 조선인의 일본 잔류 배경과 그들의 정체성 인식
민덕기
한국사연구
2008
.03
병자호란의 책임 논쟁과 기억의 서사 : 인조의 기억과 ‘대항기억’으로서의 〈강도몽유록〉
김정녀
한국학연구
2010
.12
한국역사에 있어 전쟁피로자ㆍ피납자의 송환문제 : 임진ㆍ정유왜란, 정묘ㆍ병자호란, 6ㆍ25전쟁의 사례를 중심으로
김용욱
국제정치논총
2004
.04
18세기 연행록 속의 병자호란 : 고난을 기억하는 방법
김현미
국어국문학
2005
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0