메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기독교역사연구소 한국기독교와 역사 한국기독교와 역사 제22호
발행연도
2005.3
수록면
45 - 72 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (11)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper aims to examine the Korean protestant intellectuals’ discourses on the relationship between science and religion during the Japanese colonial period. Modem secular rationalists criticized Christian belief system as a kind of superstition. Especially anti-Christianity and anti-religion movements by socialists became a fatal threat on the identity of protestantism as a religion.
In response to such challenges, Protestant intellectuals produced four kinds of discourses on the relationship between science and religion. The first was a product of protestant modernists, who compared the relationship of science and religion to two wheels of a vehicle. This means that science and religion are two instruments of civilization, always supporting each other.
The second was mainly produced by the theologically liberal camp, which gave a stress that religion ought to accept the scientific spirits. In their opinion, the conflicts between science and religion come from religion. Therefore religion, especially the conservative protestantism, should be rationalized in order to survive in the age of science.
The third was produced by the fundamentalists, who judged that the conflicts between science and religion originate from the misplaced scientific inferences, not science itself. In other words, the war between science and religion comes from secular materialism, under the guise of science. Therefore they tried to reveal the intellectual violences of scientific imperialism, arguing that science itself need not be enemy.
The last was produced by theological modernists and secular liberalists, who demand ed the complete separation of science and religion. They stressed that scientific language and religious language should be separated for the sake of the permanent peace between science and religion.

목차

1. 머리말
2. 반종교 담론의 등장과 전개
3. 개신교의 과학 담론
4. 맺음말
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0