지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to show that Korean Case-licensing System can be more clearly explained by phase. In order to prove that Case can be licensed by phase in Korean, it is important to determine what the nominative case licensor is. In this paper, following Kim (2005), we assume that a complex of inflectional elements may license nominative Case in Korean, and ,without any objection, transitive verbs may license accusative Case. However, there arise some problems in languages like Korean because Case can be realized multiply.
We adopt Covert Multiple Agree proposed by Hiraiwa (2001), in order to solve the problems mentioned the above. Unfortunately, we also find that there are some problems with his analysis. As a solution to the problems, we propose Case-licensing by phase: within CP phase nominative Case is licensed because nominative Case licensor, a complex of inflectional elements, is located within the phase and within v*P phase accusative Case is licensed because accusative Case licensor, v, is located within the phase.
Under such an assumption, we also propose that Korean Case be licensed in two ways. One is by operation Agree by which φ-features of probe and goal are checked and Case feature is checked as a reflex of the φ-features. The other is by phase. Since elements which have no φ-features can not enter into operation Agree and, consequently, can not be licensed by Agree, their Cases are claimed to be licensed by another operation, namely, by phase: if an element is within CP phase, nominative Case would be license, since the phase is the domain of nominative Case. On the other hand, if an element is within v*P phase, accusative Case would be licensed since the phase is the domain of accusative Case.
We adopt Covert Multiple Agree proposed by Hiraiwa (2001), in order to solve the problems mentioned the above. Unfortunately, we also find that there are some problems with his analysis. As a solution to the problems, we propose Case-licensing by phase: within CP phase nominative Case is licensed because nominative Case licensor, a complex of inflectional elements, is located within the phase and within v*P phase accusative Case is licensed because accusative Case licensor, v, is located within the phase.
Under such an assumption, we also propose that Korean Case be licensed in two ways. One is by operation Agree by which φ-features of probe and goal are checked and Case feature is checked as a reflex of the φ-features. The other is by phase. Since elements which have no φ-features can not enter into operation Agree and, consequently, can not be licensed by Agree, their Cases are claimed to be licensed by another operation, namely, by phase: if an element is within CP phase, nominative Case would be license, since the phase is the domain of nominative Case. On the other hand, if an element is within v*P phase, accusative Case would be licensed since the phase is the domain of accusative Case.
목차
1. 서론
2. 격 인허(Case License)
3. 일치, 격 그리고 국면
4. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (50)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 강명윤 / 1999 / 격배당의 문제, 국어의 격과 조사 / 월인 : 676 ~ 715
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김귀화 / 1988 / 국어의 격연구-격중출문과 주어인상구문을 중심으로 / 한국어 연구 14
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김선웅 / 1996 / 한국어 주격 목적어 연구 / 언어 21 : 241 ~ 261
4. [단행본] - 김미령 / 2000 / 국어의 예외적 격표시 구문에 대한 연구 in 논항구조란 무엇인가
6. [단행본] - 김용하 / 1999 / 한국어의 격과 어순의 최소주의 문법 / 한국문화사
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김귀화 / 1988 / 국어의 격연구-격중출문과 주어인상구문을 중심으로 / 한국어 연구 14
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김선웅 / 1996 / 한국어 주격 목적어 연구 / 언어 21 : 241 ~ 261
4. [단행본] - 김미령 / 2000 / 국어의 예외적 격표시 구문에 대한 연구 in 논항구조란 무엇인가
6. [단행본] - 김용하 / 1999 / 한국어의 격과 어순의 최소주의 문법 / 한국문화사
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
국면에 의한 한국어의 격 인허
어문론집
2009 .07
-
격이론의 보편성과 국어 중주격구조
언어과학연구
2000 .06
-
Constraints on Multiple Nominative Constructions in Korean : A Constraint - Based Lexicalist Approach
언어과학연구
2001 .12
-
A Study on the Associate NP of There Constructions
영어학
2002 .03
-
한국어에서의 예외격(ECM) 구문과 자동 주격 분석
생성문법연구
2014 .01
-
Two Types of Multiple Nominatives in Korean
언어학
2020 .04
-
The Modesty Principle : Alternation Between Me and X and X and I
영어영문학
2016 .11
-
Phase, Spell-Out and Syntactic Derivations
영어영문학연구
2008 .01
-
30~47 개월 일반아동의 의문사 질문 이해 발달 : 누가, 누구를, 누구한테, 무엇이, 무엇을
음성과학
2006 .09
-
Criterial Effects and Multiple Nominative Constructions
생성문법연구
2008 .01
-
Raising to Object Constructions in Korean
영어영문학연구
2011 .01
-
Two Subject Positions in Multiple Nominative Constructions
언어과학
2007 .01
-
주격 조사 ‘가’ 중출 구문 연구-구어 문어 말뭉치 분석을 바탕으로-
언어과학
2016 .01
-
한국어 주격 목적어 연구
언어
1996 .03
-
On the Notion of Feature Inheritance
생성문법연구
2011 .01
-
만주어 격 표지 be의 분포와 기능
언어학
2017 .04
-
Not all CPs Are Phases!
생성문법연구
2018 .01
-
Be동사 구문에서의 구조격
영어학
2006 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0