메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
비교민속학회 비교민속학 比較民俗學 第36輯
발행연도
2008.8
수록면
15 - 76 (62page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
A comparative study on folk are is classified into six according to purpose, target and relation. For the purpose, there is a comparative study on A)diffusion theory and B)corresponding theory, for the target there is a comparative study on C)culture theory and D)work theory, and according to the researcher and relation there is a comparative study on E)ethnocentrism and F)cultural relativism. An advisable comparative study should be proceeded from A) to B), and E) to F), but a comparative study on C) and D) must be done together. A work theory cannot be excluded in the comparative study on folk art.
Meanwhile diffusion theory of comparative study did not meet reference and theoretical principle of a diffusion theory, and it even did not consider cultural and ecological difference by burying in tradition theory. In order to overcome this limit, a new comparativism establishes a comparison model that can coherently study from comprehensive comparison to microscopic comparison. This study established a ‘comparison model for nomadic and agricultural culture’ based on experience of the precedent study. Same and different characteristics between the northern culture and our culture can be grasped and the reasons can be explained.
Therefore there is a limitation in propagating influence theory or tradition theory with partial homogeneity without considering ecological reference and cultural context. The bigger problem is not comparing the work itself well propagating tradition theory of the folk art. In art, the work itself is as important as cultural context. However for the case of a masque dance, the northern culture tradition theory is propagated as if came from Mongol without comparing. Masks of Mongol are mostly related with animals like deer, yak, and bird, but in comparison Korean masks are mainly about men. It’s very much comparative animal masks and masque dance of Ongod religion which is based on richness of pasturage is in contrast with human masks and masque dance of religions related with agricultural Gods which is based on richness of agriculture. A ‘nomadic and agricultural comparison model’ has a persuasive point.
A diffusion theory is on the assumption of order and superiority of culture, but it is hard to apply this theoretical premise to the Mongolian masque dance and the Korean masque dance. Because there is no evidence that the Mongolian masque dance is superior or precedent than the Korean masque dance. Since a ‘nomadic and agricultural comparison model’ is based on cultural and ecological reference, the two cultures should be examined equally and analyzed with cultural relativism. Therefore, the purpose of a comparative study can be attained by setting a comparison model in a new comparative point of view and comparing the two cultures equally.

목차

Ⅰ. 비교연구의 세 가지 문제
Ⅱ. 전파주의 비교연구의 문제와 전래설
Ⅲ. 비교주의 연구방법의 경향과 비교모형
Ⅳ. 문화론으로서 민속예술 비교연구 준거
Ⅴ. 작품론으로서 민속예술 비교대상 문제
Ⅵ. 연구주체와 대상의 관계 문제
참고문헌

참고문헌 (70)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0