지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Punitive damages are awarded when the defendant's conduct is found to be intentional or willful or wanton or malicious. The court may permit an award of punitive damages in addition to compensatory damages. It is intended to punish the defendant and to discourage the conduct which the defendant engaged in.
There are debates in reform of Tort Law in the United States which includes setting a national standard for the punitive damages awards. In some cases, the punitive damages award has been more than 100 times the compensatory damages. Although some States have individually set their own standards, such as type of cases that punitive damages can be awarded and jury instructions, the debate has not stop. Thus, the US Supreme Court stepped in to the debate and has heard punitive damages cases in the recent history trying to give guidance.
This note will look in to the development of the recent cases, starting from Browning-Ferris to State Farm. It will briefly show how the holds in the cases has changed and show that the Supreme Court's single-digit ratio of compensatory damages and punitive damages, in State Farm, does not provide legal binding to the States.
Korea has been analyzing whether to adopt punitive damages based on United States. One of the most critical problems is whether to regulate the amount of punitive damages. The US Supreme Court's cases shows how hard it is to set a strict ratio to punitive damages while not loosing the punitive damages jurisprudence and its effect.
There are debates in reform of Tort Law in the United States which includes setting a national standard for the punitive damages awards. In some cases, the punitive damages award has been more than 100 times the compensatory damages. Although some States have individually set their own standards, such as type of cases that punitive damages can be awarded and jury instructions, the debate has not stop. Thus, the US Supreme Court stepped in to the debate and has heard punitive damages cases in the recent history trying to give guidance.
This note will look in to the development of the recent cases, starting from Browning-Ferris to State Farm. It will briefly show how the holds in the cases has changed and show that the Supreme Court's single-digit ratio of compensatory damages and punitive damages, in State Farm, does not provide legal binding to the States.
Korea has been analyzing whether to adopt punitive damages based on United States. One of the most critical problems is whether to regulate the amount of punitive damages. The US Supreme Court's cases shows how hard it is to set a strict ratio to punitive damages while not loosing the punitive damages jurisprudence and its effect.
목차
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Cases before State Farm
Ⅲ. State Farm
Ⅳ. Conclusion
〈Reference〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
징벌적 손해배상 개념의 수용가능성
法學論文集
2015 .01
-
환경침해영역에서의 징벌적 손해배상제도의 기능
한양법학
2013 .05
-
미국 고용차별금지법제에서의 징벌적 손해배상의 역사와 원리
노동법학
2014 .12
-
환경분쟁해결 수단으로서 징벌적 손해배상제도
한양법학
2014 .11
-
현행 징벌적 손해배상 제도에 대한 비판적 고찰
동아법학
2017 .02
-
환경분쟁의 사전예방적 해결수단에 대한 검토 : 징벌적 배상의 논의를 중심으로
한양법학
2013 .05
-
징벌적 손해배상의 중재적격
중재연구
2011 .01
-
손해배상의 법리와 징벌적 손해배상의 관계
중앙법학
2004 .12
-
징벌적 손해배상제도의 도입 필요성과 가능성에 대한 일고찰
동아법학
2006 .06
-
하도급 입법의 과제- 징벌적 손해배상의 확대 문제를 중심으로 -
경영법률
2014 .01
-
中國 消費者權益保護法上의 懲罰性 賠償條項
법학연구
2006 .11
-
징벌적 손해배상보다 배심제가 먼저다
민주법학
2018 .01
-
징벌적 손해배상제도의 도입 : 노동법에서의 논의를 시작하며
노동법연구
2002 .12
-
중국 불법행위법상의 징벌적 손해배상제도
재산법연구
2010 .01
-
현행 징벌적 손해배상제도 개선에 관한 고찰
재산법연구
2020 .01
-
공정거래법상 징벌적 손해배상제도 도입의 쟁점과 전망
저스티스
2017 .12
-
안전 · 재난 사고 규제와 예방을 위한 징벌적 손해 배상 부과의 법적 쟁점 : 미국에서의 헌법적 정당성 논의를 참고하여
미국헌법연구
2016 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-300-015848275