지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2008.11
- 수록면
- 233 - 252 (20page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
ImjinWaeran-Japanese invasion by Toyotomi Hideyoshi during Chosun dynasty- has been called in the different names in the three Asian countries like Korea, China and Japan. Especially in Japan it has various names with the times. For example, it had been called 〈Karairi〉, 〈Chosenseibatsu〉, 〈Choseneki〉, 〈kouraijin〉, 〈Chosenjin〉, 〈Sankanseibatsu〉, 〈Seikan〉 since pre-modern period. But now they are calling it 〈Chosenshuppei〉 or 〈Bunrok-Keichonoeki〉 which was named after the era of the then emperor.
From the various names for ImjinWaeran we can see that Japanese understanding and evaluation about ImjinWaeran has not been done well yet. This paper is to grasp the Japanese view of the war through examining the change of understanding of ImjinWaeran which was the first overseas war for Japan to conquer the other country.
〈The conquest of Three kingdoms by empress Jingu〉 was considered the cause of ImjinWaeran in the literary works like Chosenkungimono. It can not be thought without being premised on an assumption that Chosun had paid tribute to Japan long time ago. Like this the Japanese view of Chosun has been handed down to this day, which originated from the above assumption. In the era of the Meiji Retoration ImjinWaeran was evaluated as one of historical events, which was performed to make Hideyoshi's dream-the great conquest of the continent-come true.
Since the normalization of diplomatic relations between Korea and Japan in 1965, new forms of literary works related to ImjinWaeran have appeared to be seen. In the past works we could just see ImjinWaeran as one of the historical events and heroic generals during the war like Kato Kiyomasa. But in modern works we can get to see main characters who were common people or significant and symbolic people under the name of cultural exchanges between Korea and Japan. For example, there are Sayaka (Chosun name was Kim Chungsun), Shim Soogwan, Oda Julia, lots of nameless Japanese people and women of Yangban. Through the lives of these kinds of people it seems that they tried hard to reinterpret the meaning of the war. They show an antiwar idea with their works depicting characters who were leading a tragic life affected by the war. Like this, today, it can be said that Japanese people are seeing ImjinWaeran in a new light again.
From the various names for ImjinWaeran we can see that Japanese understanding and evaluation about ImjinWaeran has not been done well yet. This paper is to grasp the Japanese view of the war through examining the change of understanding of ImjinWaeran which was the first overseas war for Japan to conquer the other country.
〈The conquest of Three kingdoms by empress Jingu〉 was considered the cause of ImjinWaeran in the literary works like Chosenkungimono. It can not be thought without being premised on an assumption that Chosun had paid tribute to Japan long time ago. Like this the Japanese view of Chosun has been handed down to this day, which originated from the above assumption. In the era of the Meiji Retoration ImjinWaeran was evaluated as one of historical events, which was performed to make Hideyoshi's dream-the great conquest of the continent-come true.
Since the normalization of diplomatic relations between Korea and Japan in 1965, new forms of literary works related to ImjinWaeran have appeared to be seen. In the past works we could just see ImjinWaeran as one of the historical events and heroic generals during the war like Kato Kiyomasa. But in modern works we can get to see main characters who were common people or significant and symbolic people under the name of cultural exchanges between Korea and Japan. For example, there are Sayaka (Chosun name was Kim Chungsun), Shim Soogwan, Oda Julia, lots of nameless Japanese people and women of Yangban. Through the lives of these kinds of people it seems that they tried hard to reinterpret the meaning of the war. They show an antiwar idea with their works depicting characters who were leading a tragic life affected by the war. Like this, today, it can be said that Japanese people are seeing ImjinWaeran in a new light again.
목차
1. 임진왜란에 대한 명칭
2. 신공황후의 삼한정벌
3. 김충선(일본명 사야카)
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
壬辰倭亂期 일본사료연구 : 풍신수길의 조선침략관련 사료를 중심으로
한일관계사연구
2008 .08
-
일본 역사개설서 및 사전류 서술 내용 분석 : 임진왜란 및 통신사 서술내용을 중심으로
한일관계사연구
2006 .10
-
경산의 임란실기연구
인문과학연구
2000 .02
-
神功皇后 전설과 日本人의 對韓觀
한일관계사연구
2006 .04
-
李德馨의 임진왜란 중 외교 활동
한국인물사연구
2007 .03
-
西厓 柳成龍의 日本에 대한 認識과 그 對應策
대구사학
2005 .01
-
韓日兩國의 歷史認識問題
사학연구
2003 .12
-
日本 古代史像의 형성과 敎科書 서술
역사교육
1999 .09
-
고려후기·조선전기 한일관계사 연구의 회고와 전망
한일관계사연구
2018 .05
-
日清、日露戦争期における日本キリスト教とその朝鮮認識に関する研究
일본문화연구
2014 .10
-
임진왜란 : 일본 고등학교 역사교과서 분석
한일관계사연구
2008 .08
-
부산의 일본 관련 문화유적과 활용방안
한국민족문화
2004 .04
-
홍가신과 임진왜란 : 충청 지역 지방관이 경험한 임진왜란 전후의 조선사회
한국인물사연구
2007 .09
-
근대 이전 일본과 우리나라의 과학기술 교류: 연구 현황과 금후의 과제
한국과학사학회지
2006 .01
-
동학농민전쟁과 일본군
역사연구
2014 .12
-
19세기 말 일본인의 조선여행기에 나타난 조선상
역사학보
2003 .03
-
전쟁 기억과 전후 중일외교의 중층구조 - 전쟁종료문제의 인식과 해석의 어긋남 -
日本思想
2013 .01
-
明治시대(1868~1912) 일본 삽화에 나타난 조선인 이미지
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2005 .12
-
근대 일본의 豊臣秀吉ㆍ임진왜란에 대한 인식
역사와경계
2007 .09
-
Korea and Japan During the Russo-Japanese War-With a Special Focus on the Japanese Occupation Forces in Korea
International Journal of Korean History
2005 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0