지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2009.5
- 수록면
- 81 - 85 (5page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the latter half of 1930s, all the critic of Yoon Kyu-Sup is related to non-majority. Yoon Kyu-Sup prescribed his critical core as a living practice about the majority people as a confronting point of view. He also made progress in political practice while criticizing the principle of the central theory. What he re-illuminated journalism as their own training camp regarding readers as political, cultural subjects is a result of non-majority people's consciousness that are going to distinguish themselves clearly with the preexistent writers. The epistemology of Yoon Kyu-Sup is composed of these two. While fixing literature to social ethics as a 'ought to be', what sharpens its blade of the majority critic is epistemology. That is the most strong non-majority discussion which is disregarding literature. Emphasis on practical living without literature, readers and journalism as a political culture, and epistemology as a ethical critic, all these contents reveal themselves to be hot-tempered aspects of social critici which are far away with literature.
In that point, the critic captured in his critic clearly has been made and used at the outside of literature after all. The reason why Yoon Kyu-Sup's utterance of the day had not taken fame depends on drawing the critic at the outside of literature too excessively. Since his critic has not caused in its inner logic, it had not shown literary alternatives and causes, that is why he couldn't avoid to carry out ethical critic.
Despite of this limit, literary critic of Yoon Kyu-Sup doesn't have less meaning to it. To insist on correct recognition takes more healthy nature than any polished literary logic in the present circumstances which literature weighed down by the political situation. Even though epistemology of Yoon Kyu-Sup inclines too heavily toward dogma deviated from the literature, his critic doesn‘t come into being meaningless, as such. Creative methodology based on aesthetic epistemology disregarded the real situation of the Joseon Dynasty period and at the same time it made an offer a moment moved on deviation from a view of the world. At this point, we rather can see a theoretical crudeness as purity in that it has not the theory of betrayal. Although a hot-tempered fundamentalism of Yoon Kyu-Sup seems rather to be imprudent, his critic speaks for itself. Because he was a non-majority people, he doesn't fear later troubles. So, he asserts himself without hesitation.
In that point, the critic captured in his critic clearly has been made and used at the outside of literature after all. The reason why Yoon Kyu-Sup's utterance of the day had not taken fame depends on drawing the critic at the outside of literature too excessively. Since his critic has not caused in its inner logic, it had not shown literary alternatives and causes, that is why he couldn't avoid to carry out ethical critic.
Despite of this limit, literary critic of Yoon Kyu-Sup doesn't have less meaning to it. To insist on correct recognition takes more healthy nature than any polished literary logic in the present circumstances which literature weighed down by the political situation. Even though epistemology of Yoon Kyu-Sup inclines too heavily toward dogma deviated from the literature, his critic doesn‘t come into being meaningless, as such. Creative methodology based on aesthetic epistemology disregarded the real situation of the Joseon Dynasty period and at the same time it made an offer a moment moved on deviation from a view of the world. At this point, we rather can see a theoretical crudeness as purity in that it has not the theory of betrayal. Although a hot-tempered fundamentalism of Yoon Kyu-Sup seems rather to be imprudent, his critic speaks for itself. Because he was a non-majority people, he doesn't fear later troubles. So, he asserts himself without hesitation.
목차
1. 서론
2. 이론보다 실천 중심에 내재된 한계
3. 독자와 저널리즘의 재발견
4. 대안 없는 부정(否定)의 인식론
5. 결론
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
HIGH PERFORMANCE WORK SYSTEMS : THE U.S. INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS CONSENSUS AND ITS CRITICS
한국노사관계학회 정책세미나
2000 .10
-
윤동주와 윤일주 동시 비교 연구 : 영향관계를 중심으로
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2007 .06
-
국내 인터넷 연구의 주제와 방법에 대한 메타 분석 : '인터넷 비평' 유관 학술 논문을 중심으로
한국언론학보
2008 .04
-
윤동주와 윤광주 시인의 시에 나타난 사랑시 비교연구
동북아 문화연구
2014 .09
-
Breaking the Distance: Asian Films, U.S. Critics, and Comparison Strategies
Journal of Asian Sociology
2012 .06
-
정책평론의 가능성에 관하여
한국공공관리학보
2002 .12
-
(주)KSS 해운의 박종규 회장의 윤리적 리더십 분석
전문경영인연구
2019 .01
-
윤연관 저, 『전환기 국제정치 경제와 한국』(서울 : 민음사, 1996)
한국정치학회보
1996 .08
-
황동규 작시법을 적용한 시 창작 교육방법 시론(試論)
한국초등교육
2015 .01
-
VAI TRÒ CỦA ĐẠI HỌC, BÁO CHÍ VÀ XUẤT BẢN TRONG VIỆC DU NHẬP CÁC LÝ THUYẾT VĂN HỌC PHƯƠNG TÂY VÀO MIỀN NAM VIỆT NAM GIAI ĐOẠN 1954-1975
동남아연구
2016 .01
-
공적 영역과 여성의 글쓰기 : 구한말 윤희순의 글을 중심으로
미디어, 젠더 & 문화
2006 .10
-
전략계획으로서 인적자원 개발계획의 문제점과 대안의 탐색
산업경제연구
1998 .11
-
언론에 보도된 영화 전문가 리뷰의 구성 요소에 관한 탐색적 연구 : 〈아가씨〉를 중심으로
문화산업연구
2017 .12
-
김동석 연구 2 - 순수문학으로부터 민족문학으로의 도정
인천학연구
2003 .12
-
劉勰의 文學史觀에 관한 몇 가지 검토
동북아 문화연구
2008 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-018322703