메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술대회자료
저자정보
저널정보
동북아시아문화학회 동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집 第 18次 東北亞細亞文化學會 大連水産學院 共同 國際學術大會
발행연도
2009.5
수록면
81 - 85 (5page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In the latter half of 1930s, all the critic of Yoon Kyu-Sup is related to non-majority. Yoon Kyu-Sup prescribed his critical core as a living practice about the majority people as a confronting point of view. He also made progress in political practice while criticizing the principle of the central theory. What he re-illuminated journalism as their own training camp regarding readers as political, cultural subjects is a result of non-majority people's consciousness that are going to distinguish themselves clearly with the preexistent writers. The epistemology of Yoon Kyu-Sup is composed of these two. While fixing literature to social ethics as a 'ought to be', what sharpens its blade of the majority critic is epistemology. That is the most strong non-majority discussion which is disregarding literature. Emphasis on practical living without literature, readers and journalism as a political culture, and epistemology as a ethical critic, all these contents reveal themselves to be hot-tempered aspects of social critici which are far away with literature.
In that point, the critic captured in his critic clearly has been made and used at the outside of literature after all. The reason why Yoon Kyu-Sup's utterance of the day had not taken fame depends on drawing the critic at the outside of literature too excessively. Since his critic has not caused in its inner logic, it had not shown literary alternatives and causes, that is why he couldn't avoid to carry out ethical critic.
Despite of this limit, literary critic of Yoon Kyu-Sup doesn't have less meaning to it. To insist on correct recognition takes more healthy nature than any polished literary logic in the present circumstances which literature weighed down by the political situation. Even though epistemology of Yoon Kyu-Sup inclines too heavily toward dogma deviated from the literature, his critic doesn‘t come into being meaningless, as such. Creative methodology based on aesthetic epistemology disregarded the real situation of the Joseon Dynasty period and at the same time it made an offer a moment moved on deviation from a view of the world. At this point, we rather can see a theoretical crudeness as purity in that it has not the theory of betrayal. Although a hot-tempered fundamentalism of Yoon Kyu-Sup seems rather to be imprudent, his critic speaks for itself. Because he was a non-majority people, he doesn't fear later troubles. So, he asserts himself without hesitation.

목차

1. 서론
2. 이론보다 실천 중심에 내재된 한계
3. 독자와 저널리즘의 재발견
4. 대안 없는 부정(否定)의 인식론
5. 결론
【Abstract】

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-018322703