지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper analyzes the Gyeongseong Communist Groups, which was one of the communist organizations operating during the final period of Japanese colonial rule, perception of the domestic and international political situation. Moreover, by studying the anti-fascist popular front, this study also strives to analyze national liberation organizations perceptions of the fascist-based ruling system and their resistance activities.
The Gyeongseong Communist Groups perception of international politics during this period can be summed as follows: their beliefs in the eventual collapse of global imperialism; the victory of the socialist revolution; and the defeat of Japan in the second Sino-Japanese War. More to the point, they believed that global imperialism would collapse as a result of the internecine wars between the imperialist powers, and that Japan, which had invaded China, would eventually be defeated by a combination of its own lack of resources, the Kuomintang-Communist united front, and guerrilla activities. As far as the domestic political situation was concerned, the Gyeongseong Communist Group believed that the lack of resources within Korea proper, more specifically the lack of food, which was the result of the long-enduring Sino-Japanese War, would lead to a furious uprising among the Minjung. They also focused their attention on the fascistic and oppressive nature of the state, including the Government-General of Joseons Naeseon Ilche policy. The Gyeongseong Communist Group also understood that even the bourgeoisie opposed the prohibition of the usage of Korean and the ordinance forcing Koreans to change their names to Japanese ones.
Based on the above-mentioned perceptions of the domestic and international spheres, the Gyeongseong Communist Group intended to integrate national opposition to the war, Japanese imperialism, and fascist-oriented ruling system into an anti-imperialist and anti-fascist popular front. The Gyeongseong Communist Group adopted two different policies with regards to this popular front strategy: First, based on the principles of joint struggle, construct a top to bottom united front with the nationalist forces, especially the anti-imperialistic and anti-war groups found within religious organizations. Second, establish petty bourgeois organizations centered around the urban petty bourgeoisie and intellectuals, and form a grassroots-based united front with revolutionary organizations. The Gyeongseong Communist Group, which established this popular front, considered a government ruled by the people as the form of state it would bring about. This popular front wished to create a government based on a proletarian hegemony, one which displayed the characteristics of an interim government which would eventually give way to a peoples democratic dictatorship.
However, it would be wrong to assume that the Gyeongseong Communist Groups ultimate goal was to establish a top-to-bottom united front. Rather their aim was to rebuild the Joseon Communist Party, and establish a proletarian hegemony. As such, the Gyeongseong Communist Group was concentrated on building the base needed to reestablish the Joseon Communist Party while focusing their activities on the recruiting of laborers and farmers.
The Gyeongseong Communist Groups perception of international politics during this period can be summed as follows: their beliefs in the eventual collapse of global imperialism; the victory of the socialist revolution; and the defeat of Japan in the second Sino-Japanese War. More to the point, they believed that global imperialism would collapse as a result of the internecine wars between the imperialist powers, and that Japan, which had invaded China, would eventually be defeated by a combination of its own lack of resources, the Kuomintang-Communist united front, and guerrilla activities. As far as the domestic political situation was concerned, the Gyeongseong Communist Group believed that the lack of resources within Korea proper, more specifically the lack of food, which was the result of the long-enduring Sino-Japanese War, would lead to a furious uprising among the Minjung. They also focused their attention on the fascistic and oppressive nature of the state, including the Government-General of Joseons Naeseon Ilche policy. The Gyeongseong Communist Group also understood that even the bourgeoisie opposed the prohibition of the usage of Korean and the ordinance forcing Koreans to change their names to Japanese ones.
Based on the above-mentioned perceptions of the domestic and international spheres, the Gyeongseong Communist Group intended to integrate national opposition to the war, Japanese imperialism, and fascist-oriented ruling system into an anti-imperialist and anti-fascist popular front. The Gyeongseong Communist Group adopted two different policies with regards to this popular front strategy: First, based on the principles of joint struggle, construct a top to bottom united front with the nationalist forces, especially the anti-imperialistic and anti-war groups found within religious organizations. Second, establish petty bourgeois organizations centered around the urban petty bourgeoisie and intellectuals, and form a grassroots-based united front with revolutionary organizations. The Gyeongseong Communist Group, which established this popular front, considered a government ruled by the people as the form of state it would bring about. This popular front wished to create a government based on a proletarian hegemony, one which displayed the characteristics of an interim government which would eventually give way to a peoples democratic dictatorship.
However, it would be wrong to assume that the Gyeongseong Communist Groups ultimate goal was to establish a top-to-bottom united front. Rather their aim was to rebuild the Joseon Communist Party, and establish a proletarian hegemony. As such, the Gyeongseong Communist Group was concentrated on building the base needed to reestablish the Joseon Communist Party while focusing their activities on the recruiting of laborers and farmers.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 경성콤그룹의 정세 인식
Ⅲ. 경성콤그룹의 반파시즘 인민전선론
Ⅳ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
제국의 주변·조선의 중심, 경성 일본인의 心像 -교육시스템과 진로문제를 중심으로-
日本學硏究
2013 .01
-
잡지 《콤무니스트》와 국제선 공산주의그룹
한국사연구
2004 .09
-
The Establishment of an Anti-Communist State Structure Following the Founding of the Korean Government
Korea Journal
1996 .03
-
초기 베트남 공산주의운동의 국외 네트워크와 재외활동가, 1928-1934
동양사학연구
2004 .09
-
Communist Life In North Korea
Korea Journal
1963 .11
-
Renewed Communist Threat to Korea : Infiltration of Communist Agents into Seoul
Korea Journal
1968 .05
-
Communist Unification Plan
Korea Journal
1965 .10
-
Changes in the Business Environment under the Wartime Control Economy and the Response of the Gyeongseong (Keijō) Electric Co.
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2011 .12
-
화북조선독립동맹과 중국공산당
역사학보
2002 .06
-
한국전쟁기 임시 교과서와 반공 아동문학: 『전시생활』·『소년기마대』·『새음악』의 반공 텍스트를 중심으로
현대문학의 연구
2018 .01
-
Communist Visions for Korea’s Future : The 1920-30s
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2017 .06
-
韓國의 冷戰文化 形成과 文化大革命 : 대중 언론매체와 학계의 문화대혁명 인식에 대한 분석을 통하여
중국근현대사연구
2010 .12
-
조선사회단체중앙협의회 상설 · 비상설 논쟁
역사비평
2019 .08
-
1930년대 초반 경성의 의료접근성 문제와 부립경비진료소 설치 논쟁
역사와현실
2019 .12
-
한반도 화교들의 한국전쟁
역사비평
2010 .05
-
'좌익'의 인간화, 그 문학적 방식과 의미 - 김원일의 『노을』을 중심으로 -
우리말글
2005 .12
-
中日戰爭期 中國共産黨의 韓國認識
역사학보
2004 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
[특집:공산주의 그룹과 당통일운동(1922∼1924)] 1922∼1924년 국내의 민족통일전선운동
이애숙
역사와현실
1998
.06
일제시대 민족해방운동의 통일전선운동
姜萬吉
한국독립운동사연구
1998
.12
[특집:조선 민족해방운동과 코민테론] 상해 임시정부 참여세력의 대소(對蘇) 교섭-이동휘 국무총리 시기(1919.11.~1921.1.)를 중심으로-
이애숙
역사와현실
1999
.06
韓国語話者によゐ「ザ行音」の調音的特性に関する研究 : パラトグラフィによる分析から
司空換
한국일본어학회 학술발표회
2004
.09
韓国語話者による「ザ行音」の調音的特性に関する時間的·空間的研究
司空煥
일본어학연구
2005
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018340073