메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제18권 제1호 (자연과학편)
발행연도
2009.2
수록면
1,109 - 1,117 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was analysis of Pacific Junior Curling Competition on teams, ends, positions, first/last throwing turns, early/final periods for helping coaches and instructors to improve junior curling players' strategies. The subjects were 3 women's teams(Korea, China, Japan) which attended in 2007 Pacific Junior Curling Competition.
In order to conduct this study, all the games were taped by 6mm camcorder, then the material was noted in paper into date. The data were analyzed strategic frequency differences between Korea, China and Japan by SPSS 16.0. The frequency were processed into percentage.
The results of analysis of strategies between Korea, China and Japan are the following. The team of Korea preferred strategies like takeout style, Japan usually progressed in strategies of draw style. However, China used same ratio between draw and takeout styles. Those results showed that Korea and China generally referred to defensive and cautious games; as a result of very few rocks being in play most shots are relatively simple. On the other hand, Japan played offensive and aggressive games, referring to a more delicate type of shot such as a come-around. This strategy are risky or complicated because a number of rocks are usually in play.
In conclusion, China won every game in this competition so I regard that types of strategy in China team is the better for junior curling player.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과 및 논의
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-692-018377418