지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This Study is concentrated on the saying of the prophet Jeremiah, that he called Nebuchadnezzar(604-562), King of Babylon the 'servant of Jahweh'. In the book of Jeremiah, he called him so three times in ch. 25:9, Z7:6, 43:10. Why, and how did he call Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon, a servant of Jahweh? During his reigning Nebuchadnezzar, and his commanders invaded Judah more than three times. He was a cruelest king and enemy to the kingdom of Judah, and also the people of Judah in Israelite and Judean monarchical history. He destroyed and fired the Temple and the Palace of Jerusalem, and exiled the Royal Families, the governors, priests and the privileged of Judah to Babylon.
I studied these three chapters in textual, historical and critical approaches and used the method, and also compare the Massoretic text with the Septuagint. Following this method, the difference appeared apparently between the Massoretic text and the Septuagint, and this calling was not found in the Septuagint at all, and then concentrated and limited in the Massoretic text only. I have studied the background and environment of the historical, political, social and prophetical milieu. It is the only one side of this theme, the others disclose and identify the meaning and content of this prophet's calling. It is the main concern of the theme that if his calling of the king of Babylon Nebuchadnezzar the servant of Jahweh would be, then what would be the status and identity of the king of Judah, priests of the temple at that time and his officials and the people of Judea, God's elected people from all other nations, planted people in the land of Israel by their God. If it had been true that Babylonian king was the servant of Jahweh, it would be really have been accepted and born magnificently, and proudly under the Babylon's yoke, and exiled from the land of Judah to Babylon. But, in the actuality, it was not so. They could not understand the facts, that it was the refusal of the will of God that they all have been rejected constantly under the yoke of Babylon. Who could know that except Jeremiah that the will of God would have been accomplished through the king of Babylon Nebuchadnezzar, the Israelites and the Judeans, royal officials and anyone of priests could not understand such affairs. The servant of Jahweh, king of Babylon Nebuchadnezzar stood plainly between 'the rod of my anger' and his anointed the Persian king Cyrus. As the servant of Jahweh, his position was located between 'the rod of my anger' and 'his anointed Persian king Cyrus'. The Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar was connected historically and theologically with them, prior to him the Assyrian king and to the later Persian King Cyrus. They were all called and they accomplished the will of God as the servant of Jahweh. It was the historical mission that was entrusted to Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar. Therefore, he had to work and accomplish both sides mentioned above. This is my conclusion.
I studied these three chapters in textual, historical and critical approaches and used the method, and also compare the Massoretic text with the Septuagint. Following this method, the difference appeared apparently between the Massoretic text and the Septuagint, and this calling was not found in the Septuagint at all, and then concentrated and limited in the Massoretic text only. I have studied the background and environment of the historical, political, social and prophetical milieu. It is the only one side of this theme, the others disclose and identify the meaning and content of this prophet's calling. It is the main concern of the theme that if his calling of the king of Babylon Nebuchadnezzar the servant of Jahweh would be, then what would be the status and identity of the king of Judah, priests of the temple at that time and his officials and the people of Judea, God's elected people from all other nations, planted people in the land of Israel by their God. If it had been true that Babylonian king was the servant of Jahweh, it would be really have been accepted and born magnificently, and proudly under the Babylon's yoke, and exiled from the land of Judah to Babylon. But, in the actuality, it was not so. They could not understand the facts, that it was the refusal of the will of God that they all have been rejected constantly under the yoke of Babylon. Who could know that except Jeremiah that the will of God would have been accomplished through the king of Babylon Nebuchadnezzar, the Israelites and the Judeans, royal officials and anyone of priests could not understand such affairs. The servant of Jahweh, king of Babylon Nebuchadnezzar stood plainly between 'the rod of my anger' and his anointed the Persian king Cyrus. As the servant of Jahweh, his position was located between 'the rod of my anger' and 'his anointed Persian king Cyrus'. The Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar was connected historically and theologically with them, prior to him the Assyrian king and to the later Persian King Cyrus. They were all called and they accomplished the will of God as the servant of Jahweh. It was the historical mission that was entrusted to Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar. Therefore, he had to work and accomplish both sides mentioned above. This is my conclusion.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 본론
Ⅲ. 결론
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
-
『리차드 2세』: 왕의 말과 왕의 트라우마, 그리고 왕권
신영어영문학
2013 .11
-
다니엘서 4장 27절의 번역에 관한 연구
Canon&Culture
2014 .04
-
조상의 하나님과 모세의 야웨
신학연구
1959 .07
-
느부갓네살의 하나님 찬양 - 다니엘서 4장
신학연구
2013 .12
-
조선시대 왕의 이중적 재현 : 인조대를 중심으로
한국학연구
2012 .03
-
아합과 시드기야, 느부갓네살, 그리고 화형(火刑) - 예레미야 29장 20~23절 연구 -
신학과 사회
2016 .01
-
사무엘상 8장 11-17절의 ‘왕의 권리’ : 왕의 정당한 권리를 이야기하는 글
구약논단
2017 .12
-
예레미야의 소명과 사명의 관계성
신학과 목회
2011 .05
-
가네코 미스즈(金子みすず) 의 여성에 관한 인식과 그 의미 : 남녀의 묘사가 다름을 중심으로
일본연구
2012 .02
-
<용비어천가>의 六祖 서술 양상 고찰
어문연구
2018 .01
-
朝鮮初期 宗親職制의 정비와 운영
한국사연구
2010 .12
-
바벨론 왕 느부갓네살 어떻게 볼 것인가?
신학과 목회
2003 .12
-
조선시대 어제시의 창작 양상과 그 의미
장서각
2008 .06
-
新羅 哀莊王代의 政治變動과 金彦昇
한국고대사연구
2004 .06
-
Joseon Kings’ Personal Belief in Buddhism and its Political Significance
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2011 .03
-
조선시대 국왕의 觀光 연구 : 陵幸을 중심으로
역사와실학
2012 .08
-
고려 충혜왕의 행적과 정치적 입장
한국인물사연구
2010 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0100-2009-230-018284818