메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
강원대학교 비교법학연구소 강원법학 江原法學 제27권
발행연도
2008.12
수록면
111 - 133 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article's main point is addressing "what and how we teach in Law School". It is very imminent issue for the professors who are supposed to lecture starting on March, 2009. Even though Law School, which we never experienced before needs our best efforts to successfully pull off, we didn't have enough time given. The method we use for teaching could contribute to thriving of Law School.
I have taken teaching method of Criminal Law I into consideration in light of possibility of using American Law School's typical teaching method, the case method and the Socratic method to our case. Subsequently, I concluded that those should be accepted limitedly because of difference of the culture and history between two countries, but "Raising problem-solving ability", the goal of Law School should be met in whichever lecture style we choose. At the same time, we should be eager to find out every possible teaching method for the goal. After the study on teaching method, I made some questions about what is called "dolus generalis".
We need to admit that we can be readily mistaken during the first few years, but can bear fruits unless we stop trying to progress. To do so, the research about teaching method that can be fitted into every situation should continue. Due to the variable that we call 'time' Law School's teaching method would be rectified 'step by step'.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제상황
Ⅱ. 법학전문대학원의 교육방법
Ⅲ. ‘개괄적 고의’의 강의안
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018393031