지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In these days, the philosophy of Descartes as being mythicized as a first signal of modern philosophy still remains in a state of interruption of interpretation. It means that there have not been efforts to strictly dissect Descartes' texts. It may come from fixed studies about notions such as subject, ego and cogito.
When a reader presents a new interpretation of the text by a critical reading, the text will have fertile meanings, which can be shared with many people. A reader who accomplishes a writing about an interpretation of original text and a reinterpretation of it should concentrate to revive and modernize the dead letters of author's meaningful ideas for one's own self.
This is the reason why I analyse the problem of Descartes' argumentation and persuasion in the Method of discourse and Meditations - especially, in the sixth meditation - on the view of new-rhetoric as a new criterion of truth and a method of research, and suggest a critical opinion about his theory. In this new-rhetorical view, Descartes' philosophy, especially the cogito argument is closed and self-centered. For Descartes as a speaker unilaterally stated his ideas to manifest his own conviction. But he neglected the rapport between readers and hearers. So, as G. Vigneaud pointed, Descartes failed to "suggest a controlled thought and a suitable expression to this thought." More than worse, Cogito ergo sum as the first principle of his philosophy implies a paradox that the principle must be explained by God as the superior criterion of truth.
In fact, the way to reach the universal truth in philosophy is too steep. Maybe that is why many people suggest Hermes rather than Apollon - especially, for M. Serres - as a symbol of contemporary philosophy. Undoubtedly, of course, if we consider this concept as a prejudice, we should throwaway. The important point is that truth is not simply the only one, but exists in multiplicity, diversity. complexity. In our universe, the truth is not a solo, but a ensemble The truth is not a supposed and reconfirmed thing as Descartes said, but a newly expanded thing which is created by our efforts.
When a reader presents a new interpretation of the text by a critical reading, the text will have fertile meanings, which can be shared with many people. A reader who accomplishes a writing about an interpretation of original text and a reinterpretation of it should concentrate to revive and modernize the dead letters of author's meaningful ideas for one's own self.
This is the reason why I analyse the problem of Descartes' argumentation and persuasion in the Method of discourse and Meditations - especially, in the sixth meditation - on the view of new-rhetoric as a new criterion of truth and a method of research, and suggest a critical opinion about his theory. In this new-rhetorical view, Descartes' philosophy, especially the cogito argument is closed and self-centered. For Descartes as a speaker unilaterally stated his ideas to manifest his own conviction. But he neglected the rapport between readers and hearers. So, as G. Vigneaud pointed, Descartes failed to "suggest a controlled thought and a suitable expression to this thought." More than worse, Cogito ergo sum as the first principle of his philosophy implies a paradox that the principle must be explained by God as the superior criterion of truth.
In fact, the way to reach the universal truth in philosophy is too steep. Maybe that is why many people suggest Hermes rather than Apollon - especially, for M. Serres - as a symbol of contemporary philosophy. Undoubtedly, of course, if we consider this concept as a prejudice, we should throwaway. The important point is that truth is not simply the only one, but exists in multiplicity, diversity. complexity. In our universe, the truth is not a solo, but a ensemble The truth is not a supposed and reconfirmed thing as Descartes said, but a newly expanded thing which is created by our efforts.
목차
1. 현대철학, 신수사학에의 관심
2. 신수사학의 두 수레바퀴와 데카르트
3. 제6성찰에 나타난 데카르트의 물음과 대답 분석
4. 철학은 진리의 학이 아닌 ‘의견학’이다
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
R. Descartes의 實體硏究
Catholic Theology and Thought
1991 .06
-
Descartes의 제일철학에 있어서 분석적 방법
철학연구
1990 .07
-
연장된 신체로서의 도구: 데카르트의 망원경 이론
한국과학사학회지
2008 .01
-
데카르트의 물질론
철학연구
1995 .06
-
데카르트 철학에 나타난 근대인 : 자유 개념을 중심으로
동서인문학
2012 .12
-
데카르트의 『제일철학에 대한 성찰』에서 초월론적 타자이론
철학사상
2015 .05
-
신수사학과 데카르트 철학 : 카임 페럴만의 관점에서 바라본 데카르트 철학
수사학
2010 .03
-
장-뤽 마리옹과 데카르트의 역사적 상황 : 데카르트의 전근대적, 근대적, 탈근대적 얼굴들
철학
2016 .08
-
Descartes에 있어서 형이상학적 사유의 근거
철학연구
1973 .10
-
하이데거의 데카르트 해석의 의도
철학
1993 .06
-
에디트 슈타인은 데카르트의 주체철학을 어떻게 극복하였는가? : 이원론적 실체관과 생명론을 중심으로
현상학과 현대철학
2014 .03
-
메르센과 데카르트에 대한 컬리의 해석은 타당한가
대동철학
2019 .01
-
데카르트의
, 과연 효과적인가? 프랑스학연구
2007 .01
-
데카르트는 회의주의를 극복하였는가? : 데카르트와 가상디의 논쟁을 중심으로
철학
2010 .08
-
데카르트 신 존재증명의 의의
철학연구
2017 .02
-
칸트의 데카르트 비판
철학
1995 .05
-
데카르트적 철학의 범형과 다산의 유학이념
온지논총
2010 .01
-
데카르트와 칸트의 주체개념
철학논총
2006 .04
-
데카르트 : 일상성과 수행성
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
1997 .06
-
하이데거와 근대철학 : 데카르트의 ‘코기토(COGITO)’ 비판을 통해 현대 위기극복의 단초 찾기
현대유럽철학연구
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-802-018427351