개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The aim of this paper is to trace a continuous history of european image of East-Asia as an other culture. By analyzing five travel writings in 19th and early 20th century it reveals that the european visitors showed the tendency to admit east-asian culture as an other culture and went so far as to demonstrate their sympathy to the people. But their attitude toward East-Asia was far from objective. There can be no doubt that the european perceptions of East-Asia were all evidently drawn from their own ideas and prejudices about another culture. So in this paper orientalism is treated as a tradition of the european prejudice or prepossession about the non-western world.
But the object of this paper is not to describe a continuous history of orientalism as a european prejudice, nor is it to identify a unified and consistent meaning of the notion of the East-Asia in Europe. Five travel writings were analysed on the assumption that each orientalist situation expresses a distinct range of the concerns with differences. What is evident is that the visitors in the early 19th century were comparatively free from the hegemonic ascendancy or the air of superiority prevailing in the era of imperialism. Further, the sexual differences is conducive to the heterogeneity of their perceptions of other culture.
Even so, we can find the persistent moment of orientalism in the viewpoint taken by the european visitors. Ultimately they failed in avoiding completely the position as europeans. To be sure, their viewpoint was not filled with the european unilateral will of power. Nevertheless, their attitude toward the East-Asia was quite contradictory. Behind their acceptance with the east-asian culture as oneself they did not abandon the impression that the East-Asia was regressive. Though they tried to keep distance with the politics, they were not reluctant to reveal the pride in the modern european culture. So it is safe to say that their viewpoint of East-Asia was basically eurocentric.
But the object of this paper is not to describe a continuous history of orientalism as a european prejudice, nor is it to identify a unified and consistent meaning of the notion of the East-Asia in Europe. Five travel writings were analysed on the assumption that each orientalist situation expresses a distinct range of the concerns with differences. What is evident is that the visitors in the early 19th century were comparatively free from the hegemonic ascendancy or the air of superiority prevailing in the era of imperialism. Further, the sexual differences is conducive to the heterogeneity of their perceptions of other culture.
Even so, we can find the persistent moment of orientalism in the viewpoint taken by the european visitors. Ultimately they failed in avoiding completely the position as europeans. To be sure, their viewpoint was not filled with the european unilateral will of power. Nevertheless, their attitude toward the East-Asia was quite contradictory. Behind their acceptance with the east-asian culture as oneself they did not abandon the impression that the East-Asia was regressive. Though they tried to keep distance with the politics, they were not reluctant to reveal the pride in the modern european culture. So it is safe to say that their viewpoint of East-Asia was basically eurocentric.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 유럽인이 “동양”을 이해하는 방식
Ⅲ. 19세기 초반 여행기 속에 나타난 동아시아
Ⅳ. 19세기 후반 제국주의 시기 독일 외교관의 눈에 비친 동아시아
Ⅴ. 여성 여행가의 눈에 비친 동아시아
Ⅵ. 나가며 - 타문화 인식의 한계와 가능성
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
동아시아적 관점에서 생각하기
역사비평
2014 .11
-
동아시아론의 전개와 역사 텍스트 속의 동아시아
역사교육
2007 .06
-
동아시아, 하나의 중심과 다부중심의 지역 : 동아시아 개념의 재구축 시론
역사학보
2014 .03
-
The Global and Regional Constitution of Nations: The View from East Asia
동양학
2008 .01
-
동아시아 역사상, 그 구축의 방식과 윤곽
역사학보
2008 .12
-
동아시아 문명공동체 로드맵 : 역내 인문ㆍ종교ㆍ문화예술 네트워크 제안
양명학
2018 .08
-
유럽정체성과 동아시아공동체 담론
역사학보
2014 .03
-
Korea’s Foreign Policy in East Asia During the 1970s
Korea Journal
1971 .04
-
미국의 동아시아 진출과 동해
史叢(사총)
2012 .01
-
한국의 동유럽학: 평가와 전망
동유럽발칸연구
2016 .01
-
Joseon Maps and East Asia
Korea Journal
2008 .03
-
International Trade System in East Asia from the First to the Fourth Century
Korea Journal
2001 .12
-
동아시아와 세계체제 이론
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
1998 .03
-
16-18세기 동아시아의 세계체제적 연계성과 비연계성
역사학보
2014 .03
-
한국 동아시아담론의 현재와 미래 : ‘동아시아공동체론’을 중심으로
통일인문학
2015 .09
-
The Alphabet of East Asia
Korea Journal
1965 .03
-
中 · 西에 가린 동아시아 : 중국 중등학교 역사교육과 동아시아 인식
동북아역사논총
2008 .03
-
가톨릭선교사 동아시아학에 관한 비교문화학적 고찰- 천학의 성립과 분화 배경을 중심으로 -
동서철학연구
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-018494959